Cargando…
Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185 |
_version_ | 1785120986957348864 |
---|---|
author | Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran Karim, Habib Md R Panda, Chinmaya K Neema, Praveen K Dey, Samarjit |
author_facet | Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran Karim, Habib Md R Panda, Chinmaya K Neema, Praveen K Dey, Samarjit |
author_sort | Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). The efficiency of such a technique over the traditional one is yet to be established well. The present study evaluated the feasibility of machine-delivered preoxygenation using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and compared the effectiveness with BMV. Methods: Thirty overweight and obese adults belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status I-II were randomized to receive PSV+PEEP or BMV for preintubation preoxygenation targeted to a fraction of expired oxygen (FeO(2))( )of 85% and 90% or for a maximum period of five minutes, whichever came first. Postintubation, the patient was observed for the time taken until 1% desaturation without ventilation. Arterial blood gases, respiratory variables, FeO(2 )achieved, and different times were collected and compared. Results: The baseline characteristics and arterial blood gases were similar between the two groups. The PSV+PEEP group had consistent and favorable tidal volume and airway pressure delivery. The difference in time to reach a FeO(2) of 85% between the two groups was not statistically different. Only two patients achieved a FeO(2) of 90% in the PSV+PEEP group versus none in the BMV group. However, partial pressure of oxygen at 1% desaturation (217.42±109.47 versus 138.073±71.319 mmHg, p 0.0259) was higher in the PSV+PEEP group. Similarly, the time until 1% desaturation was significantly prolonged in the PSV+PEEP group (206.6±76.952 versus 140.466±54.245 seconds, p 0.0111). Conclusion: The present pilot study findings indicate that preintubation machine-delivered PSV+PEEP-based preoxygenation is feasible and might be more effective than traditional BMV in overweight and obese patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10575795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105757952023-10-15 Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran Karim, Habib Md R Panda, Chinmaya K Neema, Praveen K Dey, Samarjit Cureus Anesthesiology Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). The efficiency of such a technique over the traditional one is yet to be established well. The present study evaluated the feasibility of machine-delivered preoxygenation using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and compared the effectiveness with BMV. Methods: Thirty overweight and obese adults belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status I-II were randomized to receive PSV+PEEP or BMV for preintubation preoxygenation targeted to a fraction of expired oxygen (FeO(2))( )of 85% and 90% or for a maximum period of five minutes, whichever came first. Postintubation, the patient was observed for the time taken until 1% desaturation without ventilation. Arterial blood gases, respiratory variables, FeO(2 )achieved, and different times were collected and compared. Results: The baseline characteristics and arterial blood gases were similar between the two groups. The PSV+PEEP group had consistent and favorable tidal volume and airway pressure delivery. The difference in time to reach a FeO(2) of 85% between the two groups was not statistically different. Only two patients achieved a FeO(2) of 90% in the PSV+PEEP group versus none in the BMV group. However, partial pressure of oxygen at 1% desaturation (217.42±109.47 versus 138.073±71.319 mmHg, p 0.0259) was higher in the PSV+PEEP group. Similarly, the time until 1% desaturation was significantly prolonged in the PSV+PEEP group (206.6±76.952 versus 140.466±54.245 seconds, p 0.0111). Conclusion: The present pilot study findings indicate that preintubation machine-delivered PSV+PEEP-based preoxygenation is feasible and might be more effective than traditional BMV in overweight and obese patients. Cureus 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10575795/ /pubmed/37842344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185 Text en Copyright © 2023, Rajendran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran Karim, Habib Md R Panda, Chinmaya K Neema, Praveen K Dey, Samarjit Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title | Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title_full | Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title_short | Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study |
title_sort | preintubation machine-delivered pressure support ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure versus manual bag-mask ventilation for oxygenation in overweight and obese patients: a randomized, pilot study |
topic | Anesthesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajendranpragadeshwaran preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy AT karimhabibmdr preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy AT pandachinmayak preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy AT neemapraveenk preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy AT deysamarjit preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy |