Cargando…

Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study

Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran, Karim, Habib Md R, Panda, Chinmaya K, Neema, Praveen K, Dey, Samarjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185
_version_ 1785120986957348864
author Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran
Karim, Habib Md R
Panda, Chinmaya K
Neema, Praveen K
Dey, Samarjit
author_facet Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran
Karim, Habib Md R
Panda, Chinmaya K
Neema, Praveen K
Dey, Samarjit
author_sort Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran
collection PubMed
description Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). The efficiency of such a technique over the traditional one is yet to be established well. The present study evaluated the feasibility of machine-delivered preoxygenation using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and compared the effectiveness with BMV. Methods: Thirty overweight and obese adults belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status I-II were randomized to receive PSV+PEEP or BMV for preintubation preoxygenation targeted to a fraction of expired oxygen (FeO(2))( )of 85% and 90% or for a maximum period of five minutes, whichever came first. Postintubation, the patient was observed for the time taken until 1% desaturation without ventilation. Arterial blood gases, respiratory variables, FeO(2 )achieved, and different times were collected and compared. Results: The baseline characteristics and arterial blood gases were similar between the two groups. The PSV+PEEP group had consistent and favorable tidal volume and airway pressure delivery. The difference in time to reach a FeO(2) of 85% between the two groups was not statistically different. Only two patients achieved a FeO(2) of 90% in the PSV+PEEP group versus none in the BMV group. However, partial pressure of oxygen at 1% desaturation (217.42±109.47 versus 138.073±71.319 mmHg, p 0.0259) was higher in the PSV+PEEP group. Similarly, the time until 1% desaturation was significantly prolonged in the PSV+PEEP group (206.6±76.952 versus 140.466±54.245 seconds, p 0.0111). Conclusion: The present pilot study findings indicate that preintubation machine-delivered PSV+PEEP-based preoxygenation is feasible and might be more effective than traditional BMV in overweight and obese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10575795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105757952023-10-15 Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran Karim, Habib Md R Panda, Chinmaya K Neema, Praveen K Dey, Samarjit Cureus Anesthesiology Background: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) maintains mean airway pressures well, and its usability for preoxygenation is well described. Anesthesia machine-delivered NIPPV-based preoxygenation has recently been evaluated against the traditional manual bag-mask ventilation (BMV). The efficiency of such a technique over the traditional one is yet to be established well. The present study evaluated the feasibility of machine-delivered preoxygenation using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and compared the effectiveness with BMV. Methods: Thirty overweight and obese adults belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status I-II were randomized to receive PSV+PEEP or BMV for preintubation preoxygenation targeted to a fraction of expired oxygen (FeO(2))( )of 85% and 90% or for a maximum period of five minutes, whichever came first. Postintubation, the patient was observed for the time taken until 1% desaturation without ventilation. Arterial blood gases, respiratory variables, FeO(2 )achieved, and different times were collected and compared. Results: The baseline characteristics and arterial blood gases were similar between the two groups. The PSV+PEEP group had consistent and favorable tidal volume and airway pressure delivery. The difference in time to reach a FeO(2) of 85% between the two groups was not statistically different. Only two patients achieved a FeO(2) of 90% in the PSV+PEEP group versus none in the BMV group. However, partial pressure of oxygen at 1% desaturation (217.42±109.47 versus 138.073±71.319 mmHg, p 0.0259) was higher in the PSV+PEEP group. Similarly, the time until 1% desaturation was significantly prolonged in the PSV+PEEP group (206.6±76.952 versus 140.466±54.245 seconds, p 0.0111). Conclusion: The present pilot study findings indicate that preintubation machine-delivered PSV+PEEP-based preoxygenation is feasible and might be more effective than traditional BMV in overweight and obese patients. Cureus 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10575795/ /pubmed/37842344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185 Text en Copyright © 2023, Rajendran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Rajendran, Pragadeshwaran
Karim, Habib Md R
Panda, Chinmaya K
Neema, Praveen K
Dey, Samarjit
Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title_full Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title_fullStr Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title_short Preintubation Machine-Delivered Pressure Support Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Versus Manual Bag-Mask Ventilation for Oxygenation in Overweight and Obese Patients: A Randomized, Pilot Study
title_sort preintubation machine-delivered pressure support ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure versus manual bag-mask ventilation for oxygenation in overweight and obese patients: a randomized, pilot study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45185
work_keys_str_mv AT rajendranpragadeshwaran preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy
AT karimhabibmdr preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy
AT pandachinmayak preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy
AT neemapraveenk preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy
AT deysamarjit preintubationmachinedeliveredpressuresupportventilationwithpositiveendexpiratorypressureversusmanualbagmaskventilationforoxygenationinoverweightandobesepatientsarandomizedpilotstudy