Cargando…

Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study

Neurocognitive assessment tools have been proposed to optimize, maintain, and improve perceptual-cognitive performance. Here, we investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel neurofeedback system, neuroMoon (nM), on cognitive abilities compared with one of the most popular perceptual-cognitiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horváth, Dávid, Négyesi, János, Rácz, Melinda, Győri, Tamás, Matics, Zsolt, Puskin, Artyom, Csipor, János, Rácz, Levente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44545-1
_version_ 1785121036365201408
author Horváth, Dávid
Négyesi, János
Rácz, Melinda
Győri, Tamás
Matics, Zsolt
Puskin, Artyom
Csipor, János
Rácz, Levente
author_facet Horváth, Dávid
Négyesi, János
Rácz, Melinda
Győri, Tamás
Matics, Zsolt
Puskin, Artyom
Csipor, János
Rácz, Levente
author_sort Horváth, Dávid
collection PubMed
description Neurocognitive assessment tools have been proposed to optimize, maintain, and improve perceptual-cognitive performance. Here, we investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel neurofeedback system, neuroMoon (nM), on cognitive abilities compared with one of the most popular perceptual-cognitive training (PCT) tools both in sports and rehabilitation called NeuroTracker (NT). Thirty-one young athletes performed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests from the Vienna Test System before and after a 12-session computer-based cognitive training program using nM (n = 11, age 22.6 ± 3.8 years), nM sham (CON, n = 10, age 20.3 ± 1.2 years) or NT (n = 10, age 20.5 ± 1.7 years) device. A series of repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to detect changes in cognitive abilities in response to the training. Participants had faster median reaction time in both the color-naming and word-reading conditions of the Stroop test (all p < 0.005), regardless of group. Regarding the task switching test, statistical analysis indicated faster working time and mean reaction time of the incongruent stimuli, repetition task, and shifting task (all p < 0.005), nevertheless, these changes were also regardless of group. In addition, we found fewer omitted (pre: 17.5 ± 8.3, post: 6.4 ± 1.5, d = 1.311) and more correct (pre: 261.6 ± 36.1, post: 278.6 ± 38.7, d = − 1.020) post-intervention answers in the determination test, regardless of group. Finally, participants in each group performed the digit span backward test with larger post (6.42 ± 1.54) vs. pre (5.55 ± 1.43) scores following the PCT (d = − 0.801). Overall, PCT with nM as compared with NT induced similar results in cognitive abilities suggesting its potential to be used to achieve and maintain better mental performance. However, considering that the sham stimulation also induced similar improvements in cognitive abilities, future studies should clearly determine the cognitive measures that could benefit from NF training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105760272023-10-15 Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study Horváth, Dávid Négyesi, János Rácz, Melinda Győri, Tamás Matics, Zsolt Puskin, Artyom Csipor, János Rácz, Levente Sci Rep Article Neurocognitive assessment tools have been proposed to optimize, maintain, and improve perceptual-cognitive performance. Here, we investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel neurofeedback system, neuroMoon (nM), on cognitive abilities compared with one of the most popular perceptual-cognitive training (PCT) tools both in sports and rehabilitation called NeuroTracker (NT). Thirty-one young athletes performed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests from the Vienna Test System before and after a 12-session computer-based cognitive training program using nM (n = 11, age 22.6 ± 3.8 years), nM sham (CON, n = 10, age 20.3 ± 1.2 years) or NT (n = 10, age 20.5 ± 1.7 years) device. A series of repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to detect changes in cognitive abilities in response to the training. Participants had faster median reaction time in both the color-naming and word-reading conditions of the Stroop test (all p < 0.005), regardless of group. Regarding the task switching test, statistical analysis indicated faster working time and mean reaction time of the incongruent stimuli, repetition task, and shifting task (all p < 0.005), nevertheless, these changes were also regardless of group. In addition, we found fewer omitted (pre: 17.5 ± 8.3, post: 6.4 ± 1.5, d = 1.311) and more correct (pre: 261.6 ± 36.1, post: 278.6 ± 38.7, d = − 1.020) post-intervention answers in the determination test, regardless of group. Finally, participants in each group performed the digit span backward test with larger post (6.42 ± 1.54) vs. pre (5.55 ± 1.43) scores following the PCT (d = − 0.801). Overall, PCT with nM as compared with NT induced similar results in cognitive abilities suggesting its potential to be used to achieve and maintain better mental performance. However, considering that the sham stimulation also induced similar improvements in cognitive abilities, future studies should clearly determine the cognitive measures that could benefit from NF training. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10576027/ /pubmed/37833489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44545-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Horváth, Dávid
Négyesi, János
Rácz, Melinda
Győri, Tamás
Matics, Zsolt
Puskin, Artyom
Csipor, János
Rácz, Levente
Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title_full Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title_fullStr Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title_short Feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
title_sort feasibility of a novel neurofeedback system: a parallel randomized single-blinded pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44545-1
work_keys_str_mv AT horvathdavid feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT negyesijanos feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT raczmelinda feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT gyoritamas feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT maticszsolt feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT puskinartyom feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT csiporjanos feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy
AT raczlevente feasibilityofanovelneurofeedbacksystemaparallelrandomizedsingleblindedpilotstudy