Cargando…

Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching

Advancements in minimally invasive surgery has led to the development of several surgical instruments, including the ArtiSential®. This new instrument provides a greater range of motion and improved dexterity to laparoscopic procedures, making it an alternative option to traditional straight instrum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, So Hyun, Hwang, Duyeong, Yoo, Mira, Lee, Eunju, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Suh, Yun-Suhk, Kim, Hyung-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44305-1
_version_ 1785121040218718208
author Kang, So Hyun
Hwang, Duyeong
Yoo, Mira
Lee, Eunju
Park, Young Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Suh, Yun-Suhk
Kim, Hyung-Ho
author_facet Kang, So Hyun
Hwang, Duyeong
Yoo, Mira
Lee, Eunju
Park, Young Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Suh, Yun-Suhk
Kim, Hyung-Ho
author_sort Kang, So Hyun
collection PubMed
description Advancements in minimally invasive surgery has led to the development of several surgical instruments, including the ArtiSential®. This new instrument provides a greater range of motion and improved dexterity to laparoscopic procedures, making it an alternative option to traditional straight instruments, and the Da Vinci robot system. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of a prospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy using articulating instruments with those of a historical cohort of patients who underwent the same procedure using straight instruments. The study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study matched to a retrospective historical cohort using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the rate of early complications within 90 days of surgery. Other outcomes included the operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, time to first soft fluid diet, hospital stay, and mortality. After propensity score matching, 41 patients were enrolled in both groups. The mean age was 62.4 ± 12.3 years in the conventional group and 63.5 ± 9.6 years in the artisential group (p = 0.647). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the artisential group compared to the conventional group (136.1 min vs. 163.9 min, p = 0.032). The time to first soft fluid diet was also significantly shorter in the artisential group (2.2 days vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.030), but there was no significant difference in the time to first flatus and overall hospital stay. The incidence of early complications was lower in the artisential group, but the difference was not significant (24.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.070). There was no mortality in either group. The use of articulating instruments for laparoscopic gastrectomy did not increase postoperative morbidity compared to straight laparoscopic instruments. The use of articulating instruments may be associated with faster bowel recovery and less early complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105760432023-10-15 Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching Kang, So Hyun Hwang, Duyeong Yoo, Mira Lee, Eunju Park, Young Suk Ahn, Sang-Hoon Suh, Yun-Suhk Kim, Hyung-Ho Sci Rep Article Advancements in minimally invasive surgery has led to the development of several surgical instruments, including the ArtiSential®. This new instrument provides a greater range of motion and improved dexterity to laparoscopic procedures, making it an alternative option to traditional straight instruments, and the Da Vinci robot system. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of a prospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy using articulating instruments with those of a historical cohort of patients who underwent the same procedure using straight instruments. The study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study matched to a retrospective historical cohort using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the rate of early complications within 90 days of surgery. Other outcomes included the operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, time to first soft fluid diet, hospital stay, and mortality. After propensity score matching, 41 patients were enrolled in both groups. The mean age was 62.4 ± 12.3 years in the conventional group and 63.5 ± 9.6 years in the artisential group (p = 0.647). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the artisential group compared to the conventional group (136.1 min vs. 163.9 min, p = 0.032). The time to first soft fluid diet was also significantly shorter in the artisential group (2.2 days vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.030), but there was no significant difference in the time to first flatus and overall hospital stay. The incidence of early complications was lower in the artisential group, but the difference was not significant (24.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.070). There was no mortality in either group. The use of articulating instruments for laparoscopic gastrectomy did not increase postoperative morbidity compared to straight laparoscopic instruments. The use of articulating instruments may be associated with faster bowel recovery and less early complications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10576043/ /pubmed/37833448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44305-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kang, So Hyun
Hwang, Duyeong
Yoo, Mira
Lee, Eunju
Park, Young Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Suh, Yun-Suhk
Kim, Hyung-Ho
Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title_full Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title_fullStr Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title_short Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
title_sort feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44305-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kangsohyun feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT hwangduyeong feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT yoomira feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT leeeunju feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT parkyoungsuk feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT ahnsanghoon feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT suhyunsuhk feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching
AT kimhyungho feasibilityofarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsinlaparoscopicgastrectomyusingpropensityscorematching