Cargando…
A scientist’s take on scientific evidence in the courtroom
Scientific evidence is frequently offered to answer questions of fact in a court of law. DNA genotyping may link a suspect to a homicide. Receptor binding assays and behavioral toxicology may testify to the teratogenic effects of bug repellant. As for any use of science to inform fateful decisions,...
Autor principal: | Albright, Thomas D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301839120 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Scientists in the courtroom: basic pointers for the expert scientific witness.
por: Eaton, D L, et al.
Publicado: (1994) -
Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review
por: Aono, Darby, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence
por: van Velkinburgh, Jennifer Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Statistical science in the courtroom
por: Gastwirth, Joseph
Publicado: (2000) -
Scientists and scientific organizations need to play a greater role in science diplomacy
por: Gluckman, Peter D.
Publicado: (2022)