Cargando…

Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?

In prisons, participatory mechanisms can foster important outcomes including fairness, legitimacy and dignity. Complaints are one significant (symbolic) mechanism facilitating prisoner participation. Ombud institutions/Ombudsmen handle complaints externally, providing unelected accountability mechan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banwell-Moore, Rebecca, Tomczak, Philippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14773708221094271
_version_ 1785121067830870016
author Banwell-Moore, Rebecca
Tomczak, Philippa
author_facet Banwell-Moore, Rebecca
Tomczak, Philippa
author_sort Banwell-Moore, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description In prisons, participatory mechanisms can foster important outcomes including fairness, legitimacy and dignity. Complaints are one significant (symbolic) mechanism facilitating prisoner participation. Ombud institutions/Ombudsmen handle complaints externally, providing unelected accountability mechanisms and overseeing prisons around the world. A fair complaints process can stimulate prisoner voice, agency and rights protection, potentially averting self-harm and violence, and facilitating systemic improvements. However, complaints mechanisms are little studied. Addressing this gap, we: i) contextualise discussion by demonstrating that prisoners’ actions have directly shaped complaints mechanisms available today; ii) outline prison complaints mechanisms in the case study jurisdiction of England and Wales; and iii) provide a critical review of literature to assess whether prison complaints systems are, in practice, participatory, inclusive and fair? We conclude that complaints mechanisms hold clear potential to enhance prison legitimacy, facilitate prisoner engagement and agency, and improve wellbeing and safety. However, myriad barriers prevent prisoners from participating in complaints processes, including culture, fear, accessibility, timeliness, emotional repression, and bureaucracy. The process of complaining and experiences of these barriers are uneven across different groups of prisoners. Our article provides a springboard for future empirical research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105761932023-10-15 Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation? Banwell-Moore, Rebecca Tomczak, Philippa Eur J Criminol Articles In prisons, participatory mechanisms can foster important outcomes including fairness, legitimacy and dignity. Complaints are one significant (symbolic) mechanism facilitating prisoner participation. Ombud institutions/Ombudsmen handle complaints externally, providing unelected accountability mechanisms and overseeing prisons around the world. A fair complaints process can stimulate prisoner voice, agency and rights protection, potentially averting self-harm and violence, and facilitating systemic improvements. However, complaints mechanisms are little studied. Addressing this gap, we: i) contextualise discussion by demonstrating that prisoners’ actions have directly shaped complaints mechanisms available today; ii) outline prison complaints mechanisms in the case study jurisdiction of England and Wales; and iii) provide a critical review of literature to assess whether prison complaints systems are, in practice, participatory, inclusive and fair? We conclude that complaints mechanisms hold clear potential to enhance prison legitimacy, facilitate prisoner engagement and agency, and improve wellbeing and safety. However, myriad barriers prevent prisoners from participating in complaints processes, including culture, fear, accessibility, timeliness, emotional repression, and bureaucracy. The process of complaining and experiences of these barriers are uneven across different groups of prisoners. Our article provides a springboard for future empirical research. SAGE Publications 2022-06-06 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10576193/ /pubmed/37841107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14773708221094271 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Banwell-Moore, Rebecca
Tomczak, Philippa
Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title_full Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title_fullStr Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title_full_unstemmed Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title_short Complaints: Mechanisms for prisoner participation?
title_sort complaints: mechanisms for prisoner participation?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14773708221094271
work_keys_str_mv AT banwellmoorerebecca complaintsmechanismsforprisonerparticipation
AT tomczakphilippa complaintsmechanismsforprisonerparticipation