Cargando…

Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US

IMPORTANCE: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to health care and health outcomes. Therefore, maternal health insurance type may be associated with differences in infant outcomes in the US. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, among infants born in the US, maternal private...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Desalyn L., Carlo, Waldemar A., Rahman, A. K. M. Fazlur, Tindal, Rachel, Trulove, Sarah G., Watt, Mykaela J., Travers, Colm P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37690
_version_ 1785121070694531072
author Johnson, Desalyn L.
Carlo, Waldemar A.
Rahman, A. K. M. Fazlur
Tindal, Rachel
Trulove, Sarah G.
Watt, Mykaela J.
Travers, Colm P.
author_facet Johnson, Desalyn L.
Carlo, Waldemar A.
Rahman, A. K. M. Fazlur
Tindal, Rachel
Trulove, Sarah G.
Watt, Mykaela J.
Travers, Colm P.
author_sort Johnson, Desalyn L.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to health care and health outcomes. Therefore, maternal health insurance type may be associated with differences in infant outcomes in the US. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, among infants born in the US, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance is associated with a lower infant mortality rate (IMR). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research expanded linked birth and infant death records database from 2017 to 2020. Hospital-born infants from 20 to 42 weeks of gestational age were included if the mother had either private or Medicaid insurance. Infants with congenital anomalies, those without a recorded method of payment, and those without either private insurance or Medicaid were excluded. Data analysis was performed from June 2022 to August 2023. EXPOSURES: Private vs Medicaid insurance. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the IMR. Negative-binomial regression adjusted for race, sex, multiple birth, any maternal pregnancy risk factors (as defined by the CDC), education level, and tobacco use was used to determine the difference in IMR between private and Medicaid insurance. The χ(2) or Fisher exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. RESULTS: Of the 13 562 625 infants included (6 631 735 girls [48.9%]), 7 327 339 mothers (54.0%) had private insurance and 6 235 286 (46.0%) were insured by Medicaid. Infants born to mothers with private insurance had a lower IMR compared with infants born to those with Medicaid (2.75 vs 5.30 deaths per 1000 live births; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .009). Those with private insurance had a significantly lower risk of postneonatal mortality (0.81 vs 2.41 deaths per 1000 births; aRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.68; P < .001), low birth weight (aRR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94; P < .001), vaginal breech delivery (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96; P = .02), and preterm birth (aRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97; P = .002) and a higher probability of first trimester prenatal care (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.21-1.27; P < .001) compared with those with Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, maternal Medicaid insurance was associated with increased risk of infant mortality at the population level in the US. Novel strategies are needed to improve access to care, quality of care, and outcomes among women and infants enrolled in Medicaid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105762092023-10-15 Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US Johnson, Desalyn L. Carlo, Waldemar A. Rahman, A. K. M. Fazlur Tindal, Rachel Trulove, Sarah G. Watt, Mykaela J. Travers, Colm P. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to health care and health outcomes. Therefore, maternal health insurance type may be associated with differences in infant outcomes in the US. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, among infants born in the US, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance is associated with a lower infant mortality rate (IMR). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research expanded linked birth and infant death records database from 2017 to 2020. Hospital-born infants from 20 to 42 weeks of gestational age were included if the mother had either private or Medicaid insurance. Infants with congenital anomalies, those without a recorded method of payment, and those without either private insurance or Medicaid were excluded. Data analysis was performed from June 2022 to August 2023. EXPOSURES: Private vs Medicaid insurance. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the IMR. Negative-binomial regression adjusted for race, sex, multiple birth, any maternal pregnancy risk factors (as defined by the CDC), education level, and tobacco use was used to determine the difference in IMR between private and Medicaid insurance. The χ(2) or Fisher exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. RESULTS: Of the 13 562 625 infants included (6 631 735 girls [48.9%]), 7 327 339 mothers (54.0%) had private insurance and 6 235 286 (46.0%) were insured by Medicaid. Infants born to mothers with private insurance had a lower IMR compared with infants born to those with Medicaid (2.75 vs 5.30 deaths per 1000 live births; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .009). Those with private insurance had a significantly lower risk of postneonatal mortality (0.81 vs 2.41 deaths per 1000 births; aRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.68; P < .001), low birth weight (aRR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94; P < .001), vaginal breech delivery (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96; P = .02), and preterm birth (aRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97; P = .002) and a higher probability of first trimester prenatal care (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.21-1.27; P < .001) compared with those with Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, maternal Medicaid insurance was associated with increased risk of infant mortality at the population level in the US. Novel strategies are needed to improve access to care, quality of care, and outcomes among women and infants enrolled in Medicaid. American Medical Association 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10576209/ /pubmed/37831450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37690 Text en Copyright 2023 Johnson DL et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Johnson, Desalyn L.
Carlo, Waldemar A.
Rahman, A. K. M. Fazlur
Tindal, Rachel
Trulove, Sarah G.
Watt, Mykaela J.
Travers, Colm P.
Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title_full Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title_fullStr Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title_full_unstemmed Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title_short Health Insurance and Differences in Infant Mortality Rates in the US
title_sort health insurance and differences in infant mortality rates in the us
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37690
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsondesalynl healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT carlowaldemara healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT rahmanakmfazlur healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT tindalrachel healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT trulovesarahg healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT wattmykaelaj healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus
AT traverscolmp healthinsuranceanddifferencesininfantmortalityratesintheus