Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus

BACKGROUND: Neurotropic viruses in the family Rhabdoviridae, genus Lyssavirus, are what cause rabies, an acute, progressive, and highly lethal encephalomyelitis. AIM: Evaluation of the used diagnostic techniques to determine the most simple; rapid and accurate test for rabies virus (RABV) recognitio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegazy, Dalia N., Hosseny, Ebtesam N., Abo-Senna, Amal S. M., Salem, Zeinab T., Khodeir, Mohamed H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842113
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i9.13
_version_ 1785121148562833408
author Hegazy, Dalia N.
Hosseny, Ebtesam N.
Abo-Senna, Amal S. M.
Salem, Zeinab T.
Khodeir, Mohamed H.
author_facet Hegazy, Dalia N.
Hosseny, Ebtesam N.
Abo-Senna, Amal S. M.
Salem, Zeinab T.
Khodeir, Mohamed H.
author_sort Hegazy, Dalia N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neurotropic viruses in the family Rhabdoviridae, genus Lyssavirus, are what cause rabies, an acute, progressive, and highly lethal encephalomyelitis. AIM: Evaluation of the used diagnostic techniques to determine the most simple; rapid and accurate test for rabies virus (RABV) recognition in different specimens aiming to reach a rapid diagnosis as a step aid in the disease control and to prevent or even minimize the suspected hazard. METHOD: The used techniques included an infection trial of Swiss mice with the mice-adapted challenge rabies virus followed by the detection of the virus in the infected mices’ brains. Virus detection was carried out through the application BHK21 cell line infection; fluorescent antibody technique; latex agglutination test (LAT); direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); rabies antigen detection kit ELISA; conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: It was found that virus inoculation in mice and BHK21 cell lines needs 5–7 days with positivity of 90% and 100%, respectively. Rapid antigen kit was able to detect rabies antigen in mice brains suspension and BHK21 infected fluid within 3–5 minutes with percentages of 60% and 55.5%, respectively. In 1–1.5 hours, the direct fluorescent antibody method (DFAT) detected 90% and 100% of the rabies antigen in BHK21 cell line infection and brain impressions, respectively. Latex agglutination showed clear results with 88.8% with BHK21 infected fluid within 3–5 minutes while it did not carry out on brain emulsions to prevent falsely positive results brought on by the presence of tissue fragments. Conventional one-step PCR revealed 100% positivity with either brain or cell culture preparations within 2 days. Direct ELISA showed 88.8% positivity with BHK21 infected fluid with 1 day of work. CONCLUSION: Mice inoculation test, cell culture infection; DFAT and PCR are the most accurate techniques for the detection of RABV with a positivity of 90%–100% followed by LAT and ELISA with a positivity of 88.8%, and lastly, rabies antigen ELISA kit (RAK) with a positivity of 55.5%–60% taking in consideration the required time for each. In addition, the positivity % of the applied tests revealed their sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105765892023-10-15 Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus Hegazy, Dalia N. Hosseny, Ebtesam N. Abo-Senna, Amal S. M. Salem, Zeinab T. Khodeir, Mohamed H. Open Vet J Original Research BACKGROUND: Neurotropic viruses in the family Rhabdoviridae, genus Lyssavirus, are what cause rabies, an acute, progressive, and highly lethal encephalomyelitis. AIM: Evaluation of the used diagnostic techniques to determine the most simple; rapid and accurate test for rabies virus (RABV) recognition in different specimens aiming to reach a rapid diagnosis as a step aid in the disease control and to prevent or even minimize the suspected hazard. METHOD: The used techniques included an infection trial of Swiss mice with the mice-adapted challenge rabies virus followed by the detection of the virus in the infected mices’ brains. Virus detection was carried out through the application BHK21 cell line infection; fluorescent antibody technique; latex agglutination test (LAT); direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); rabies antigen detection kit ELISA; conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: It was found that virus inoculation in mice and BHK21 cell lines needs 5–7 days with positivity of 90% and 100%, respectively. Rapid antigen kit was able to detect rabies antigen in mice brains suspension and BHK21 infected fluid within 3–5 minutes with percentages of 60% and 55.5%, respectively. In 1–1.5 hours, the direct fluorescent antibody method (DFAT) detected 90% and 100% of the rabies antigen in BHK21 cell line infection and brain impressions, respectively. Latex agglutination showed clear results with 88.8% with BHK21 infected fluid within 3–5 minutes while it did not carry out on brain emulsions to prevent falsely positive results brought on by the presence of tissue fragments. Conventional one-step PCR revealed 100% positivity with either brain or cell culture preparations within 2 days. Direct ELISA showed 88.8% positivity with BHK21 infected fluid with 1 day of work. CONCLUSION: Mice inoculation test, cell culture infection; DFAT and PCR are the most accurate techniques for the detection of RABV with a positivity of 90%–100% followed by LAT and ELISA with a positivity of 88.8%, and lastly, rabies antigen ELISA kit (RAK) with a positivity of 55.5%–60% taking in consideration the required time for each. In addition, the positivity % of the applied tests revealed their sensitivity and specificity. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2023-09 2023-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10576589/ /pubmed/37842113 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i9.13 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hegazy, Dalia N.
Hosseny, Ebtesam N.
Abo-Senna, Amal S. M.
Salem, Zeinab T.
Khodeir, Mohamed H.
Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title_full Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title_short Comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
title_sort comparative evaluation of some techniques used for the detection of rabies virus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842113
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i9.13
work_keys_str_mv AT hegazydalian comparativeevaluationofsometechniquesusedforthedetectionofrabiesvirus
AT hossenyebtesamn comparativeevaluationofsometechniquesusedforthedetectionofrabiesvirus
AT abosennaamalsm comparativeevaluationofsometechniquesusedforthedetectionofrabiesvirus
AT salemzeinabt comparativeevaluationofsometechniquesusedforthedetectionofrabiesvirus
AT khodeirmohamedh comparativeevaluationofsometechniquesusedforthedetectionofrabiesvirus