Cargando…
Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry
OBJECTIVES: We report 1-year safety and clinical outcomes in patients <60 years undergoing bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve intervention. METHODS: The INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry to assess clinical outcomes of patients <60 years. Patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37462612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivad115 |
_version_ | 1785121158104875008 |
---|---|
author | Meuris, Bart Roussel, Jean-Christian Borger, Michael A Siepe, Matthias Stefano, Pierluigi Laufer, Günther Langanay, Thierry Theron, Alexis Grabenwöger, Martin Binder, Konrad Demers, Philippe Pessotto, Renzo van Leeuwen, Wouter Bourguignon, Thierry Canovas, Sergio Mariscalco, Giovanni Coscioni, Enrico Dagenais, Francois Wendler, Olaf Polvani, Gianluca Eden, Matthias Botta, Beate Bramlage, Peter De Paulis, Ruggero |
author_facet | Meuris, Bart Roussel, Jean-Christian Borger, Michael A Siepe, Matthias Stefano, Pierluigi Laufer, Günther Langanay, Thierry Theron, Alexis Grabenwöger, Martin Binder, Konrad Demers, Philippe Pessotto, Renzo van Leeuwen, Wouter Bourguignon, Thierry Canovas, Sergio Mariscalco, Giovanni Coscioni, Enrico Dagenais, Francois Wendler, Olaf Polvani, Gianluca Eden, Matthias Botta, Beate Bramlage, Peter De Paulis, Ruggero |
author_sort | Meuris, Bart |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We report 1-year safety and clinical outcomes in patients <60 years undergoing bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve intervention. METHODS: The INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry to assess clinical outcomes of patients <60 years. Patients with planned SAVR with or without concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta and/or coronary bypass surgery were included. Time-related valve safety, haemodynamic performance and quality of life (QoL) at 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were documented with a mean age of 53.5 years, 76.5% being male and 27.2% in NYHA class III/IV. Outcomes within 30 days included cardiovascular-related mortality (0.7%), time-related valve safety (VARC-2; 5.8%), thromboembolic events (1.7%), valve-related life-threatening bleeding (VARC-2; 4.3%) and permanent pacemaker implantation (3.8%). QoL was significantly increased at 6 months and sustained at 1 year. Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1 year was 98.3% (95% confidence interval 97.1; 99.6) and 81.8% were NYHA I versus 21.9% at baseline. No patient developed structural valve deterioration stage 3 (VARC-3). The mean aortic pressure gradient was 12.6 mmHg at 1 year and the effective orifice area was 1.9 cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year data from the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve demonstrate good safety and excellent haemodynamic performance as well as an early QoL improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03666741. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10576637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105766372023-10-15 Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry Meuris, Bart Roussel, Jean-Christian Borger, Michael A Siepe, Matthias Stefano, Pierluigi Laufer, Günther Langanay, Thierry Theron, Alexis Grabenwöger, Martin Binder, Konrad Demers, Philippe Pessotto, Renzo van Leeuwen, Wouter Bourguignon, Thierry Canovas, Sergio Mariscalco, Giovanni Coscioni, Enrico Dagenais, Francois Wendler, Olaf Polvani, Gianluca Eden, Matthias Botta, Beate Bramlage, Peter De Paulis, Ruggero Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Valvular Heart Disease OBJECTIVES: We report 1-year safety and clinical outcomes in patients <60 years undergoing bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve intervention. METHODS: The INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry to assess clinical outcomes of patients <60 years. Patients with planned SAVR with or without concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta and/or coronary bypass surgery were included. Time-related valve safety, haemodynamic performance and quality of life (QoL) at 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were documented with a mean age of 53.5 years, 76.5% being male and 27.2% in NYHA class III/IV. Outcomes within 30 days included cardiovascular-related mortality (0.7%), time-related valve safety (VARC-2; 5.8%), thromboembolic events (1.7%), valve-related life-threatening bleeding (VARC-2; 4.3%) and permanent pacemaker implantation (3.8%). QoL was significantly increased at 6 months and sustained at 1 year. Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1 year was 98.3% (95% confidence interval 97.1; 99.6) and 81.8% were NYHA I versus 21.9% at baseline. No patient developed structural valve deterioration stage 3 (VARC-3). The mean aortic pressure gradient was 12.6 mmHg at 1 year and the effective orifice area was 1.9 cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year data from the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve demonstrate good safety and excellent haemodynamic performance as well as an early QoL improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03666741. Oxford University Press 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10576637/ /pubmed/37462612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivad115 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Valvular Heart Disease Meuris, Bart Roussel, Jean-Christian Borger, Michael A Siepe, Matthias Stefano, Pierluigi Laufer, Günther Langanay, Thierry Theron, Alexis Grabenwöger, Martin Binder, Konrad Demers, Philippe Pessotto, Renzo van Leeuwen, Wouter Bourguignon, Thierry Canovas, Sergio Mariscalco, Giovanni Coscioni, Enrico Dagenais, Francois Wendler, Olaf Polvani, Gianluca Eden, Matthias Botta, Beate Bramlage, Peter De Paulis, Ruggero Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title | Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title_full | Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title_fullStr | Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title_short | Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective INDURE registry |
title_sort | durability of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60 years — 1-year follow-up from the prospective indure registry |
topic | Valvular Heart Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37462612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivad115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meurisbart durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT rousseljeanchristian durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT borgermichaela durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT siepematthias durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT stefanopierluigi durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT laufergunther durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT langanaythierry durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT theronalexis durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT grabenwogermartin durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT binderkonrad durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT demersphilippe durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT pessottorenzo durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT vanleeuwenwouter durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT bourguignonthierry durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT canovassergio durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT mariscalcogiovanni durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT coscionienrico durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT dagenaisfrancois durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT wendlerolaf durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT polvanigianluca durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT edenmatthias durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT bottabeate durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT bramlagepeter durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry AT depaulisruggero durabilityofbioprostheticaorticvalvereplacementinpatientsundertheageof60years1yearfollowupfromtheprospectiveindureregistry |