Cargando…
N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers
Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EF(urine)) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0 |
_version_ | 1785121173472804864 |
---|---|
author | Barczyk, Lena Kuntu-Blankson, Kate Calanca, Pierluigi Six, Johan Ammann, Christof |
author_facet | Barczyk, Lena Kuntu-Blankson, Kate Calanca, Pierluigi Six, Johan Ammann, Christof |
author_sort | Barczyk, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EF(urine)) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics used in experimental studies, revealing contrary results on the effects of urine patch characteristics and seasonal pattern. Therefore, we examined N(2)O emissions and corresponding EF(urine) values in relation to urine patch characteristics (urine N concentration, urine volume, patch area, urine composition) and environmental drivers (precipitation, water filled pore space, soil temperature). Ten artificial urine application experiments were performed from July 2020 to June 2022 on a pasture located in Eastern Switzerland. Urine N concentration, patch area, volume and urine N composition showed no significant effects on the EF(urine) value (p > 0.05). EF(urine) varied, however, strongly over time (0.17–2.05%). A large part of the variation could be predicted either by cumulative precipitation 20 days after urine application using a second order polynomial model (Adj. R(2) = 0.60) or average WFPS 30 days after urine application using a linear model (Adj. R(2) = 0.45). The derived precipitation model was used to simulate EF(urine) weekly over the last 20 years showing no significant differences between the seasons of a year. The resulting overall average EF(urine) was 0.67%. More field studies are needed across sites/regions differing in climate and soil properties to implement a country-specific EF(3) for Switzerland and to improve the quantification of N(2)O emissions at the national scales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10576711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105767112023-10-16 N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers Barczyk, Lena Kuntu-Blankson, Kate Calanca, Pierluigi Six, Johan Ammann, Christof Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst Original Paper Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EF(urine)) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics used in experimental studies, revealing contrary results on the effects of urine patch characteristics and seasonal pattern. Therefore, we examined N(2)O emissions and corresponding EF(urine) values in relation to urine patch characteristics (urine N concentration, urine volume, patch area, urine composition) and environmental drivers (precipitation, water filled pore space, soil temperature). Ten artificial urine application experiments were performed from July 2020 to June 2022 on a pasture located in Eastern Switzerland. Urine N concentration, patch area, volume and urine N composition showed no significant effects on the EF(urine) value (p > 0.05). EF(urine) varied, however, strongly over time (0.17–2.05%). A large part of the variation could be predicted either by cumulative precipitation 20 days after urine application using a second order polynomial model (Adj. R(2) = 0.60) or average WFPS 30 days after urine application using a linear model (Adj. R(2) = 0.45). The derived precipitation model was used to simulate EF(urine) weekly over the last 20 years showing no significant differences between the seasons of a year. The resulting overall average EF(urine) was 0.67%. More field studies are needed across sites/regions differing in climate and soil properties to implement a country-specific EF(3) for Switzerland and to improve the quantification of N(2)O emissions at the national scales. Springer Netherlands 2023-07-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10576711/ /pubmed/37846228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Barczyk, Lena Kuntu-Blankson, Kate Calanca, Pierluigi Six, Johan Ammann, Christof N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title | N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title_full | N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title_fullStr | N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title_full_unstemmed | N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title_short | N(2)O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
title_sort | n(2)o emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barczyklena n2oemissionfactorsforcattleurineeffectofpatchcharacteristicsandenvironmentaldrivers AT kuntublanksonkate n2oemissionfactorsforcattleurineeffectofpatchcharacteristicsandenvironmentaldrivers AT calancapierluigi n2oemissionfactorsforcattleurineeffectofpatchcharacteristicsandenvironmentaldrivers AT sixjohan n2oemissionfactorsforcattleurineeffectofpatchcharacteristicsandenvironmentaldrivers AT ammannchristof n2oemissionfactorsforcattleurineeffectofpatchcharacteristicsandenvironmentaldrivers |