Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Recently, several new first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have been approved for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, direct comparisons between first-line treatments are lacking. Therefore, we indirectly compared the effic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231206147 |
_version_ | 1785121219589177344 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Youwen Liu, Kun Zhu, Hong Cao, Hui Zhou, Yangying |
author_facet | Zhu, Youwen Liu, Kun Zhu, Hong Cao, Hui Zhou, Yangying |
author_sort | Zhu, Youwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, several new first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have been approved for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, direct comparisons between first-line treatments are lacking. Therefore, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of specific treatment strategies to inform physicians’ and patients’ clinical decisions. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 27 November 2022, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing first-line immuno-chemotherapies for ES-SCLC. A fixed-effect multivariable meta-regression model was established for frequentist network meta-analysis and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed to compare the effects of immuno-chemotherapies on patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while risk ratios with 95% CI were used for treatment- and immune-related adverse events (AEs). The p score values were then used to rank treatments based on their odds of being the best treatment option. The research protocol was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42022383254). RESULTS: Seven studies involving 3822 patients were eligible for analysis. Serplulimab plus chemotherapy had better OS outcomes compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.49–0.82) and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50–0.90). It additionally exhibited better PFS outcomes compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.39–0.60), adebrelimab (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53–0.97), atezolizumab (HR = 0.62; 0.46–0.85), durvalumab (HR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45–0.80), durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43–0.76), ipilimumab (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.44–0.73), and pembrolizumab (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48–0.86) plus chemotherapy. Serplulimab plus chemotherapy was linked to the greatest odds of effectively reducing the odds of death (p score = 0.87) and progression (p score = 0.99) while exhibiting a good safety profile. CONCLUSION: Serplulimab plus chemotherapy exhibited the best survival outcomes with manageable AEs. Thus, serplulimab plus chemotherapy may represent the optimal best first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10576922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105769222023-10-16 Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial Zhu, Youwen Liu, Kun Zhu, Hong Cao, Hui Zhou, Yangying Ther Adv Med Oncol Controversies in Immunotherapy for Patients with Lung Cancer: Pragmatic Solutions BACKGROUND: Recently, several new first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have been approved for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, direct comparisons between first-line treatments are lacking. Therefore, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of specific treatment strategies to inform physicians’ and patients’ clinical decisions. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 27 November 2022, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing first-line immuno-chemotherapies for ES-SCLC. A fixed-effect multivariable meta-regression model was established for frequentist network meta-analysis and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed to compare the effects of immuno-chemotherapies on patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while risk ratios with 95% CI were used for treatment- and immune-related adverse events (AEs). The p score values were then used to rank treatments based on their odds of being the best treatment option. The research protocol was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42022383254). RESULTS: Seven studies involving 3822 patients were eligible for analysis. Serplulimab plus chemotherapy had better OS outcomes compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.49–0.82) and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50–0.90). It additionally exhibited better PFS outcomes compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.39–0.60), adebrelimab (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53–0.97), atezolizumab (HR = 0.62; 0.46–0.85), durvalumab (HR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45–0.80), durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43–0.76), ipilimumab (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.44–0.73), and pembrolizumab (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48–0.86) plus chemotherapy. Serplulimab plus chemotherapy was linked to the greatest odds of effectively reducing the odds of death (p score = 0.87) and progression (p score = 0.99) while exhibiting a good safety profile. CONCLUSION: Serplulimab plus chemotherapy exhibited the best survival outcomes with manageable AEs. Thus, serplulimab plus chemotherapy may represent the optimal best first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC patients. SAGE Publications 2023-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10576922/ /pubmed/37846397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231206147 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Controversies in Immunotherapy for Patients with Lung Cancer: Pragmatic Solutions Zhu, Youwen Liu, Kun Zhu, Hong Cao, Hui Zhou, Yangying Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of novel immuno-chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
topic | Controversies in Immunotherapy for Patients with Lung Cancer: Pragmatic Solutions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231206147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuyouwen comparativeefficacyandsafetyofnovelimmunochemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liukun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofnovelimmunochemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhuhong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofnovelimmunochemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caohui comparativeefficacyandsafetyofnovelimmunochemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhouyangying comparativeefficacyandsafetyofnovelimmunochemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcanceranetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial |