Cargando…

How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language

Prior research has found that iconicity facilitates sign production in picture-naming paradigms and has effects on ERP components. These findings may be explained by two separate hypotheses: (1) a task-specific hypothesis that suggests these effects occur because visual features of the iconic sign f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGarry, Meghan E., Midgley, Katherine J., Holcomb, Phillip J., Emmorey, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36796720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108516
_version_ 1785121225048064000
author McGarry, Meghan E.
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
author_facet McGarry, Meghan E.
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
author_sort McGarry, Meghan E.
collection PubMed
description Prior research has found that iconicity facilitates sign production in picture-naming paradigms and has effects on ERP components. These findings may be explained by two separate hypotheses: (1) a task-specific hypothesis that suggests these effects occur because visual features of the iconic sign form can map onto the visual features of the pictures, and (2) a semantic feature hypothesis that suggests that the retrieval of iconic signs results in greater semantic activation due to the robust representation of sensory-motor semantic features compared to non-iconic signs. To test these two hypotheses, iconic and non-iconic American Sign Language (ASL) signs were elicited from deaf native/early signers using a picture-naming task and an English-to-ASL translation task, while electrophysiological recordings were made. Behavioral facilitation (faster response times) and reduced negativities were observed for iconic signs (both prior to and within the N400 time window), but only in the picture-naming task. No ERP or behavioral differences were found between iconic and non-iconic signs in the translation task. This pattern of results supports the task-specific hypothesis and provides evidence that iconicity only facilitates sign production when the eliciting stimulus and the form of the sign can visually overlap (a picture-sign alignment effect).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105769522023-10-15 How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language McGarry, Meghan E. Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen Neuropsychologia Article Prior research has found that iconicity facilitates sign production in picture-naming paradigms and has effects on ERP components. These findings may be explained by two separate hypotheses: (1) a task-specific hypothesis that suggests these effects occur because visual features of the iconic sign form can map onto the visual features of the pictures, and (2) a semantic feature hypothesis that suggests that the retrieval of iconic signs results in greater semantic activation due to the robust representation of sensory-motor semantic features compared to non-iconic signs. To test these two hypotheses, iconic and non-iconic American Sign Language (ASL) signs were elicited from deaf native/early signers using a picture-naming task and an English-to-ASL translation task, while electrophysiological recordings were made. Behavioral facilitation (faster response times) and reduced negativities were observed for iconic signs (both prior to and within the N400 time window), but only in the picture-naming task. No ERP or behavioral differences were found between iconic and non-iconic signs in the translation task. This pattern of results supports the task-specific hypothesis and provides evidence that iconicity only facilitates sign production when the eliciting stimulus and the form of the sign can visually overlap (a picture-sign alignment effect). 2023-05-03 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10576952/ /pubmed/36796720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108516 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
McGarry, Meghan E.
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title_full How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title_fullStr How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title_full_unstemmed How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title_short How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language
title_sort how (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: an electrophysiological study of american sign language
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36796720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108516
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgarrymeghane howandwhydoesiconicityeffectlexicalaccessanelectrophysiologicalstudyofamericansignlanguage
AT midgleykatherinej howandwhydoesiconicityeffectlexicalaccessanelectrophysiologicalstudyofamericansignlanguage
AT holcombphillipj howandwhydoesiconicityeffectlexicalaccessanelectrophysiologicalstudyofamericansignlanguage
AT emmoreykaren howandwhydoesiconicityeffectlexicalaccessanelectrophysiologicalstudyofamericansignlanguage