Cargando…

A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

Introduction Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a well-known and accepted surgical technique for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and radiological comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) and plate/cannulated screw (P/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savaş, Toktamış, Karsli, Burcin, Kurt, Vahap, Yavuz Savaş, Nurcihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846254
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45308
_version_ 1785121230717714432
author Savaş, Toktamış
Karsli, Burcin
Kurt, Vahap
Yavuz Savaş, Nurcihan
author_facet Savaş, Toktamış
Karsli, Burcin
Kurt, Vahap
Yavuz Savaş, Nurcihan
author_sort Savaş, Toktamış
collection PubMed
description Introduction Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a well-known and accepted surgical technique for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and radiological comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) and plate/cannulated screw (P/cS) fixation methods in patients undergoing TTCA. Methods Patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis due to traumatic causes or rheumatic diseases between December 2012 and March 2019 were included in the retrospective study. Patients who underwent isolated tibiotalar or isolated subtalar arthrodesis were not included in the study. Functional scores of patients with bone fusion were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score surveys, administered either in person or by phone. From the radiological point of view, it was evaluated whether the union was achieved with the two-view ankle radiograph. There were 48 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis in the clinical archive. A total of 31 patients were excluded from the study due to failure to attend follow-up, inability to be reached, or non-compliance with study criteria. The mean age of the patients participating in the study was 44.12 ± 12.95 years, the follow-up time was 40.06 ± 27.31 months, the union time was 5.19 ± 3.17 months, and the AOFAS score was 53.12 ± 13.87. SF-36 scores were evaluated among their own subunits. Results A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 13 were male (76.47%) and 4 were female (23.53%). There was no significant effect of the fixation methods (RIMN or P/cS) selected for TTCA on union times (p>0.05). However, there were significant differences in some parameters of the SF-36 when compared by gender. According to this, the scores of men in physical function (PF), mental health (MH), and general health perception (GHP) were higher than those of women. When AOFAS and SF-36 scores were compared by fixation type, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion This study investigated the impact of the fixation method on clinical and radiological outcomes in TTCA. We found that both methods were clinically similar in terms of bone union time and surgical efficacy. However, men had better physical function, mental health, and general health perception after TTCA than women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10576983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105769832023-10-16 A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Savaş, Toktamış Karsli, Burcin Kurt, Vahap Yavuz Savaş, Nurcihan Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a well-known and accepted surgical technique for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and radiological comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) and plate/cannulated screw (P/cS) fixation methods in patients undergoing TTCA. Methods Patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis due to traumatic causes or rheumatic diseases between December 2012 and March 2019 were included in the retrospective study. Patients who underwent isolated tibiotalar or isolated subtalar arthrodesis were not included in the study. Functional scores of patients with bone fusion were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score surveys, administered either in person or by phone. From the radiological point of view, it was evaluated whether the union was achieved with the two-view ankle radiograph. There were 48 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis in the clinical archive. A total of 31 patients were excluded from the study due to failure to attend follow-up, inability to be reached, or non-compliance with study criteria. The mean age of the patients participating in the study was 44.12 ± 12.95 years, the follow-up time was 40.06 ± 27.31 months, the union time was 5.19 ± 3.17 months, and the AOFAS score was 53.12 ± 13.87. SF-36 scores were evaluated among their own subunits. Results A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 13 were male (76.47%) and 4 were female (23.53%). There was no significant effect of the fixation methods (RIMN or P/cS) selected for TTCA on union times (p>0.05). However, there were significant differences in some parameters of the SF-36 when compared by gender. According to this, the scores of men in physical function (PF), mental health (MH), and general health perception (GHP) were higher than those of women. When AOFAS and SF-36 scores were compared by fixation type, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion This study investigated the impact of the fixation method on clinical and radiological outcomes in TTCA. We found that both methods were clinically similar in terms of bone union time and surgical efficacy. However, men had better physical function, mental health, and general health perception after TTCA than women. Cureus 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10576983/ /pubmed/37846254 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45308 Text en Copyright © 2023, Savaş et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Savaş, Toktamış
Karsli, Burcin
Kurt, Vahap
Yavuz Savaş, Nurcihan
A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title_full A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title_fullStr A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title_full_unstemmed A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title_short A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
title_sort single-center comparative study: outcome analysis of fixation techniques for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846254
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45308
work_keys_str_mv AT savastoktamıs asinglecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT karsliburcin asinglecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT kurtvahap asinglecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT yavuzsavasnurcihan asinglecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT savastoktamıs singlecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT karsliburcin singlecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT kurtvahap singlecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT yavuzsavasnurcihan singlecentercomparativestudyoutcomeanalysisoffixationtechniquesfortibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis