Cargando…

Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair

Quantification of cortisol concentration in hair has become a promising conservation tool for non-invasive monitoring of “stress” in wild populations, yet this method needs to be carefully validated for each species. The goals of the study were: • Immunologically validate two methods (study 1 and 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doss, Elina Marielle, Jouffroy, Mathilde, Rey, Benjamin, Cohas, Aurélie, von Hardenberg, Achaz, Smith, Tessa Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102418
_version_ 1785121245077962752
author Doss, Elina Marielle
Jouffroy, Mathilde
Rey, Benjamin
Cohas, Aurélie
von Hardenberg, Achaz
Smith, Tessa Ellen
author_facet Doss, Elina Marielle
Jouffroy, Mathilde
Rey, Benjamin
Cohas, Aurélie
von Hardenberg, Achaz
Smith, Tessa Ellen
author_sort Doss, Elina Marielle
collection PubMed
description Quantification of cortisol concentration in hair has become a promising conservation tool for non-invasive monitoring of “stress” in wild populations, yet this method needs to be carefully validated for each species. The goals of the study were: • Immunologically validate two methods (study 1 and 2 respectively) to extract and quantify cortisol in the hair of wild Alpine marmots. • Compare the amount of cortisol extracted from hair samples using two methods i.e. cut into fine pieces (study 1) and hair samples pulverized using a ball mill (study 2). • Determine the extent to which methods in study 2 could provide individual specific hair cortisol (HC) measures when samples were taken from the same body location. Within and between individual variations in HC levels were examined from multiple hair samples from 14 subjects in study 2. We evaluated if inter-individual variations in HC levels could be explained by sex and age. At least twice the amount of cortisol was obtained per g/hair when samples were pulverized in a ball mill prior to extraction compared to when cut into pieces. Our methods demonstrated intra-individual consistency in HC at a given time point: inter-individual variation in HC was three times larger than within individual variance. Sex and age did not impact HC levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105770592023-10-16 Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair Doss, Elina Marielle Jouffroy, Mathilde Rey, Benjamin Cohas, Aurélie von Hardenberg, Achaz Smith, Tessa Ellen MethodsX Agricultural and Biological Science Quantification of cortisol concentration in hair has become a promising conservation tool for non-invasive monitoring of “stress” in wild populations, yet this method needs to be carefully validated for each species. The goals of the study were: • Immunologically validate two methods (study 1 and 2 respectively) to extract and quantify cortisol in the hair of wild Alpine marmots. • Compare the amount of cortisol extracted from hair samples using two methods i.e. cut into fine pieces (study 1) and hair samples pulverized using a ball mill (study 2). • Determine the extent to which methods in study 2 could provide individual specific hair cortisol (HC) measures when samples were taken from the same body location. Within and between individual variations in HC levels were examined from multiple hair samples from 14 subjects in study 2. We evaluated if inter-individual variations in HC levels could be explained by sex and age. At least twice the amount of cortisol was obtained per g/hair when samples were pulverized in a ball mill prior to extraction compared to when cut into pieces. Our methods demonstrated intra-individual consistency in HC at a given time point: inter-individual variation in HC was three times larger than within individual variance. Sex and age did not impact HC levels. Elsevier 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10577059/ /pubmed/37846357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102418 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Science
Doss, Elina Marielle
Jouffroy, Mathilde
Rey, Benjamin
Cohas, Aurélie
von Hardenberg, Achaz
Smith, Tessa Ellen
Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title_full Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title_fullStr Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title_full_unstemmed Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title_short Technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in Alpine marmot hair
title_sort technical validation and a comparison of two methods to quantify individual levels of glucocorticoids in alpine marmot hair
topic Agricultural and Biological Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102418
work_keys_str_mv AT dosselinamarielle technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair
AT jouffroymathilde technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair
AT reybenjamin technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair
AT cohasaurelie technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair
AT vonhardenbergachaz technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair
AT smithtessaellen technicalvalidationandacomparisonoftwomethodstoquantifyindividuallevelsofglucocorticoidsinalpinemarmothair