Cargando…
Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6 |
_version_ | 1785121251517267968 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Glenn J. Matovu, Joseph K. B. Juncker, Margrethe Namisango, Eve Bouskill, Kathryn Nakami, Sylvia Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly Luyirika, Emmanuel Bogart, Laura M. Green, Harold D. Wanyenze, Rhoda K. |
author_facet | Wagner, Glenn J. Matovu, Joseph K. B. Juncker, Margrethe Namisango, Eve Bouskill, Kathryn Nakami, Sylvia Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly Luyirika, Emmanuel Bogart, Laura M. Green, Harold D. Wanyenze, Rhoda K. |
author_sort | Wagner, Glenn J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitated, manualized, 7-session group intervention to train women to engage in CC prevention advocacy. Forty women recently screened for CC (index participants) enrolled and were assigned to receive the intervention (n = 20) or wait-list control (n = 20). Each index was asked to recruit up to three female social network members (alters) who had not been screened for CC (n = 103 enrolled alters). All index and alter participants were assessed at baseline and month-6 follow-up. All but one (n = 39; 98%) index and 98 (95%) alter participants completed the month 6 assessment. In multivariate regression models controlling for baseline outcome measures and demographic covariates, intervention alters were more likely to have been screened for CC at month 6 [67% vs. 16%; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 12.13 (4.07, 36.16)], compared to control alters. Data also revealed significant increased engagement in CC prevention advocacy, among both index and alter participants in the intervention group at month 6, compared to the control group. The intervention was highly effective in increasing CC screening uptake among social network members, and engagement in CC prevention advocacy among not only intervention recipients, but also targets of advocacy, suggesting the potential for wide dissemination of CC knowledge. Trial Registration. NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT04960748 (clinicaltrials.gov). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10577098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105770982023-10-17 Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda Wagner, Glenn J. Matovu, Joseph K. B. Juncker, Margrethe Namisango, Eve Bouskill, Kathryn Nakami, Sylvia Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly Luyirika, Emmanuel Bogart, Laura M. Green, Harold D. Wanyenze, Rhoda K. J Behav Med Article Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitated, manualized, 7-session group intervention to train women to engage in CC prevention advocacy. Forty women recently screened for CC (index participants) enrolled and were assigned to receive the intervention (n = 20) or wait-list control (n = 20). Each index was asked to recruit up to three female social network members (alters) who had not been screened for CC (n = 103 enrolled alters). All index and alter participants were assessed at baseline and month-6 follow-up. All but one (n = 39; 98%) index and 98 (95%) alter participants completed the month 6 assessment. In multivariate regression models controlling for baseline outcome measures and demographic covariates, intervention alters were more likely to have been screened for CC at month 6 [67% vs. 16%; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 12.13 (4.07, 36.16)], compared to control alters. Data also revealed significant increased engagement in CC prevention advocacy, among both index and alter participants in the intervention group at month 6, compared to the control group. The intervention was highly effective in increasing CC screening uptake among social network members, and engagement in CC prevention advocacy among not only intervention recipients, but also targets of advocacy, suggesting the potential for wide dissemination of CC knowledge. Trial Registration. NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT04960748 (clinicaltrials.gov). Springer US 2023-09-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10577098/ /pubmed/37702912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wagner, Glenn J. Matovu, Joseph K. B. Juncker, Margrethe Namisango, Eve Bouskill, Kathryn Nakami, Sylvia Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly Luyirika, Emmanuel Bogart, Laura M. Green, Harold D. Wanyenze, Rhoda K. Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title | Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title_full | Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title_short | Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda |
title_sort | effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in uganda |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnerglennj effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT matovujosephkb effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT junckermargrethe effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT namisangoeve effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT bouskillkathryn effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT nakamisylvia effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT beyezakashesyajolly effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT luyirikaemmanuel effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT bogartlauram effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT greenharoldd effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda AT wanyenzerhodak effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda |