Cargando…

Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda

Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Glenn J., Matovu, Joseph K. B., Juncker, Margrethe, Namisango, Eve, Bouskill, Kathryn, Nakami, Sylvia, Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly, Luyirika, Emmanuel, Bogart, Laura M., Green, Harold D., Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6
_version_ 1785121251517267968
author Wagner, Glenn J.
Matovu, Joseph K. B.
Juncker, Margrethe
Namisango, Eve
Bouskill, Kathryn
Nakami, Sylvia
Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly
Luyirika, Emmanuel
Bogart, Laura M.
Green, Harold D.
Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
author_facet Wagner, Glenn J.
Matovu, Joseph K. B.
Juncker, Margrethe
Namisango, Eve
Bouskill, Kathryn
Nakami, Sylvia
Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly
Luyirika, Emmanuel
Bogart, Laura M.
Green, Harold D.
Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
author_sort Wagner, Glenn J.
collection PubMed
description Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitated, manualized, 7-session group intervention to train women to engage in CC prevention advocacy. Forty women recently screened for CC (index participants) enrolled and were assigned to receive the intervention (n = 20) or wait-list control (n = 20). Each index was asked to recruit up to three female social network members (alters) who had not been screened for CC (n = 103 enrolled alters). All index and alter participants were assessed at baseline and month-6 follow-up. All but one (n = 39; 98%) index and 98 (95%) alter participants completed the month 6 assessment. In multivariate regression models controlling for baseline outcome measures and demographic covariates, intervention alters were more likely to have been screened for CC at month 6 [67% vs. 16%; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 12.13 (4.07, 36.16)], compared to control alters. Data also revealed significant increased engagement in CC prevention advocacy, among both index and alter participants in the intervention group at month 6, compared to the control group. The intervention was highly effective in increasing CC screening uptake among social network members, and engagement in CC prevention advocacy among not only intervention recipients, but also targets of advocacy, suggesting the potential for wide dissemination of CC knowledge. Trial Registration. NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT04960748 (clinicaltrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105770982023-10-17 Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda Wagner, Glenn J. Matovu, Joseph K. B. Juncker, Margrethe Namisango, Eve Bouskill, Kathryn Nakami, Sylvia Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly Luyirika, Emmanuel Bogart, Laura M. Green, Harold D. Wanyenze, Rhoda K. J Behav Med Article Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitated, manualized, 7-session group intervention to train women to engage in CC prevention advocacy. Forty women recently screened for CC (index participants) enrolled and were assigned to receive the intervention (n = 20) or wait-list control (n = 20). Each index was asked to recruit up to three female social network members (alters) who had not been screened for CC (n = 103 enrolled alters). All index and alter participants were assessed at baseline and month-6 follow-up. All but one (n = 39; 98%) index and 98 (95%) alter participants completed the month 6 assessment. In multivariate regression models controlling for baseline outcome measures and demographic covariates, intervention alters were more likely to have been screened for CC at month 6 [67% vs. 16%; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 12.13 (4.07, 36.16)], compared to control alters. Data also revealed significant increased engagement in CC prevention advocacy, among both index and alter participants in the intervention group at month 6, compared to the control group. The intervention was highly effective in increasing CC screening uptake among social network members, and engagement in CC prevention advocacy among not only intervention recipients, but also targets of advocacy, suggesting the potential for wide dissemination of CC knowledge. Trial Registration. NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT04960748 (clinicaltrials.gov). Springer US 2023-09-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10577098/ /pubmed/37702912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wagner, Glenn J.
Matovu, Joseph K. B.
Juncker, Margrethe
Namisango, Eve
Bouskill, Kathryn
Nakami, Sylvia
Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly
Luyirika, Emmanuel
Bogart, Laura M.
Green, Harold D.
Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title_full Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title_fullStr Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title_short Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda
title_sort effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerglennj effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT matovujosephkb effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT junckermargrethe effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT namisangoeve effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT bouskillkathryn effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT nakamisylvia effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT beyezakashesyajolly effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT luyirikaemmanuel effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT bogartlauram effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT greenharoldd effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda
AT wanyenzerhodak effectsofapeeradvocacyinterventiononcervicalcancerscreeningamongsocialnetworkmembersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuganda