Cargando…
Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the image quality of reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla (T) compared with 3.0 T. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers were included into this prospective study. All the subjects underwent the 3.0 T and 5.0 T MR examinations (time interval: 2 ± 1.9 days)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01513-7 |
_version_ | 1785121255952744448 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yunfei Sheng, Ruofan Yang, Chun Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu |
author_facet | Zhang, Yunfei Sheng, Ruofan Yang, Chun Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu |
author_sort | Zhang, Yunfei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the image quality of reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla (T) compared with 3.0 T. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers were included into this prospective study. All the subjects underwent the 3.0 T and 5.0 T MR examinations (time interval: 2 ± 1.9 days). Free-breathing (FB), respiratory-triggered (RT), and navigator-triggered (NT) spin-echo echo-planner imaging-based rFOV-DWI examinations were conducted at 3.0 T and 5.0 T (FB(3.0 T), NT(3.0 T), RT(3.0 T), FB(5.0 T), NT(5.0 T), and RT(5.0 T)) with two b values (b = 0 and 800 s/mm(2)), respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of different acquisition approaches were determined and statistically compared. The image quality was assessed and statistically compared with a 5-point scoring system. RESULTS: The SNRs of any 5.0 T DWI images were significantly higher than those of any 3.0 T DWI images for same anatomic locations. Moreover, 5.0 T rFOV-DWIs had the significantly higher sharpness scores than 3.0 T rFOV-DWIs. Similar distortion scores were observed at both 3.0 T and 5.0 T. Finally, RT(5.0 T) displayed the best overall image quality followed by NT(5.0 T), FB(5.0 T), RT(3.0 T), NT(3.0 T) and FB(3.0 T) (RT(5.0 T) = 3.9 ± 0.3, NT(5.0 T) = 3.8 ± 0.3, FB(5.0 T) = 3.4 ± 0.3, RT(3.0 T) = 3.2 ± 0.4, NT(3.0 T) = 3.1 ± 0.4, and FB(3.0 T) = 2.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 5.0 T rFOV-DWI showed better overall image quality and improved SNR compared to 3.0 T rFOV-DWI, which holds clinical potential for identifying the abdominal abnormalities in routine practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study provided evidence that abdominal 5.0 Tesla reduced field of view diffusion-weighted imaging (5.0 T rFOV-DWI) exhibited enhanced image quality and higher SNR compared to its 3.0 Tesla counterparts, holding clinical promise for accurately visualizing abdominal abnormalities. KEY POINTS: • rFOV-DWI was firstly integrated with high-field-MRI for visualizing various abdominal organs. • This study indicated the feasibility of abdominal 5.0 T-rFOV-DWI. • Better image quality was identified for 5.0 T rFOV-DWI. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10577120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105771202023-10-17 Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla Zhang, Yunfei Sheng, Ruofan Yang, Chun Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the image quality of reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla (T) compared with 3.0 T. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers were included into this prospective study. All the subjects underwent the 3.0 T and 5.0 T MR examinations (time interval: 2 ± 1.9 days). Free-breathing (FB), respiratory-triggered (RT), and navigator-triggered (NT) spin-echo echo-planner imaging-based rFOV-DWI examinations were conducted at 3.0 T and 5.0 T (FB(3.0 T), NT(3.0 T), RT(3.0 T), FB(5.0 T), NT(5.0 T), and RT(5.0 T)) with two b values (b = 0 and 800 s/mm(2)), respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of different acquisition approaches were determined and statistically compared. The image quality was assessed and statistically compared with a 5-point scoring system. RESULTS: The SNRs of any 5.0 T DWI images were significantly higher than those of any 3.0 T DWI images for same anatomic locations. Moreover, 5.0 T rFOV-DWIs had the significantly higher sharpness scores than 3.0 T rFOV-DWIs. Similar distortion scores were observed at both 3.0 T and 5.0 T. Finally, RT(5.0 T) displayed the best overall image quality followed by NT(5.0 T), FB(5.0 T), RT(3.0 T), NT(3.0 T) and FB(3.0 T) (RT(5.0 T) = 3.9 ± 0.3, NT(5.0 T) = 3.8 ± 0.3, FB(5.0 T) = 3.4 ± 0.3, RT(3.0 T) = 3.2 ± 0.4, NT(3.0 T) = 3.1 ± 0.4, and FB(3.0 T) = 2.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 5.0 T rFOV-DWI showed better overall image quality and improved SNR compared to 3.0 T rFOV-DWI, which holds clinical potential for identifying the abdominal abnormalities in routine practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study provided evidence that abdominal 5.0 Tesla reduced field of view diffusion-weighted imaging (5.0 T rFOV-DWI) exhibited enhanced image quality and higher SNR compared to its 3.0 Tesla counterparts, holding clinical promise for accurately visualizing abdominal abnormalities. KEY POINTS: • rFOV-DWI was firstly integrated with high-field-MRI for visualizing various abdominal organs. • This study indicated the feasibility of abdominal 5.0 T-rFOV-DWI. • Better image quality was identified for 5.0 T rFOV-DWI. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Vienna 2023-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10577120/ /pubmed/37840062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01513-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Yunfei Sheng, Ruofan Yang, Chun Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title | Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title_full | Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title_fullStr | Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title_full_unstemmed | Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title_short | Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla |
title_sort | higher field reduced fov diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 tesla |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01513-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyunfei higherfieldreducedfovdiffusionweightedimagingforabdominalimagingat50teslaimagequalityevaluationcomparedwith30tesla AT shengruofan higherfieldreducedfovdiffusionweightedimagingforabdominalimagingat50teslaimagequalityevaluationcomparedwith30tesla AT yangchun higherfieldreducedfovdiffusionweightedimagingforabdominalimagingat50teslaimagequalityevaluationcomparedwith30tesla AT daiyongming higherfieldreducedfovdiffusionweightedimagingforabdominalimagingat50teslaimagequalityevaluationcomparedwith30tesla AT zengmengsu higherfieldreducedfovdiffusionweightedimagingforabdominalimagingat50teslaimagequalityevaluationcomparedwith30tesla |