Cargando…
Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038 |
_version_ | 1785121309645078528 |
---|---|
author | Kächele, Martin Bettac, Lucas Hofmann, Christopher Herrmann, Hannes Brandt, Amelie Schröppel, Bernd Schulte-Kemna, Lena |
author_facet | Kächele, Martin Bettac, Lucas Hofmann, Christopher Herrmann, Hannes Brandt, Amelie Schröppel, Bernd Schulte-Kemna, Lena |
author_sort | Kächele, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of solely ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled central venous dialysis catheters (USCVCs). METHODS: We evaluated prospectively collected single-center data regarding safety and catheter function of 134 consecutive patients who underwent USCVC implantation between 2020 and 2021. We used the inset guidewire to visualize the position of the catheter tip. In the case of inadequate visibility by ultrasound, we used intracardiac electrocardiography (ECG) recording or agitated saline. A total of 1844 catheter days were assessed. The optimal CVC position was defined as being within the upper right atrium (URA) and middle to deep right atrium. RESULTS: Of the 134 USCVCs, 87% were placed on the right side. The primary success rate for optimal tip position and catheter function was 98%. Of the USCVCs, 97% were placed solely by ultrasound. Regarding positioning, 6% were in the vena cava superior zone, 70% in the URA and 24% in the middle to deep right atrium, resulting in a rate of 94% with optimal positioning. Effective blood flow averaged 292 ± 39 ml/min. There were no immediate procedure-associated complications. CONCLUSION: Placement of CVC for hemodialysis solely by ultrasound is an effective alternative to fluoroscopy-assisted placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10577359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105773592023-10-17 Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters Kächele, Martin Bettac, Lucas Hofmann, Christopher Herrmann, Hannes Brandt, Amelie Schröppel, Bernd Schulte-Kemna, Lena Kidney Int Rep Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of solely ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled central venous dialysis catheters (USCVCs). METHODS: We evaluated prospectively collected single-center data regarding safety and catheter function of 134 consecutive patients who underwent USCVC implantation between 2020 and 2021. We used the inset guidewire to visualize the position of the catheter tip. In the case of inadequate visibility by ultrasound, we used intracardiac electrocardiography (ECG) recording or agitated saline. A total of 1844 catheter days were assessed. The optimal CVC position was defined as being within the upper right atrium (URA) and middle to deep right atrium. RESULTS: Of the 134 USCVCs, 87% were placed on the right side. The primary success rate for optimal tip position and catheter function was 98%. Of the USCVCs, 97% were placed solely by ultrasound. Regarding positioning, 6% were in the vena cava superior zone, 70% in the URA and 24% in the middle to deep right atrium, resulting in a rate of 94% with optimal positioning. Effective blood flow averaged 292 ± 39 ml/min. There were no immediate procedure-associated complications. CONCLUSION: Placement of CVC for hemodialysis solely by ultrasound is an effective alternative to fluoroscopy-assisted placement. Elsevier 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10577359/ /pubmed/37849990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038 Text en © 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Kächele, Martin Bettac, Lucas Hofmann, Christopher Herrmann, Hannes Brandt, Amelie Schröppel, Bernd Schulte-Kemna, Lena Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title | Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title_full | Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title_fullStr | Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title_short | Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters |
title_sort | feasibility analysis of ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kachelemartin feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT bettaclucas feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT hofmannchristopher feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT herrmannhannes feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT brandtamelie feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT schroppelbernd feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters AT schultekemnalena feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters |