Cargando…

Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kächele, Martin, Bettac, Lucas, Hofmann, Christopher, Herrmann, Hannes, Brandt, Amelie, Schröppel, Bernd, Schulte-Kemna, Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038
_version_ 1785121309645078528
author Kächele, Martin
Bettac, Lucas
Hofmann, Christopher
Herrmann, Hannes
Brandt, Amelie
Schröppel, Bernd
Schulte-Kemna, Lena
author_facet Kächele, Martin
Bettac, Lucas
Hofmann, Christopher
Herrmann, Hannes
Brandt, Amelie
Schröppel, Bernd
Schulte-Kemna, Lena
author_sort Kächele, Martin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of solely ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled central venous dialysis catheters (USCVCs). METHODS: We evaluated prospectively collected single-center data regarding safety and catheter function of 134 consecutive patients who underwent USCVC implantation between 2020 and 2021. We used the inset guidewire to visualize the position of the catheter tip. In the case of inadequate visibility by ultrasound, we used intracardiac electrocardiography (ECG) recording or agitated saline. A total of 1844 catheter days were assessed. The optimal CVC position was defined as being within the upper right atrium (URA) and middle to deep right atrium. RESULTS: Of the 134 USCVCs, 87% were placed on the right side. The primary success rate for optimal tip position and catheter function was 98%. Of the USCVCs, 97% were placed solely by ultrasound. Regarding positioning, 6% were in the vena cava superior zone, 70% in the URA and 24% in the middle to deep right atrium, resulting in a rate of 94% with optimal positioning. Effective blood flow averaged 292 ± 39 ml/min. There were no immediate procedure-associated complications. CONCLUSION: Placement of CVC for hemodialysis solely by ultrasound is an effective alternative to fluoroscopy-assisted placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105773592023-10-17 Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters Kächele, Martin Bettac, Lucas Hofmann, Christopher Herrmann, Hannes Brandt, Amelie Schröppel, Bernd Schulte-Kemna, Lena Kidney Int Rep Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of solely ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled central venous dialysis catheters (USCVCs). METHODS: We evaluated prospectively collected single-center data regarding safety and catheter function of 134 consecutive patients who underwent USCVC implantation between 2020 and 2021. We used the inset guidewire to visualize the position of the catheter tip. In the case of inadequate visibility by ultrasound, we used intracardiac electrocardiography (ECG) recording or agitated saline. A total of 1844 catheter days were assessed. The optimal CVC position was defined as being within the upper right atrium (URA) and middle to deep right atrium. RESULTS: Of the 134 USCVCs, 87% were placed on the right side. The primary success rate for optimal tip position and catheter function was 98%. Of the USCVCs, 97% were placed solely by ultrasound. Regarding positioning, 6% were in the vena cava superior zone, 70% in the URA and 24% in the middle to deep right atrium, resulting in a rate of 94% with optimal positioning. Effective blood flow averaged 292 ± 39 ml/min. There were no immediate procedure-associated complications. CONCLUSION: Placement of CVC for hemodialysis solely by ultrasound is an effective alternative to fluoroscopy-assisted placement. Elsevier 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10577359/ /pubmed/37849990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038 Text en © 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kächele, Martin
Bettac, Lucas
Hofmann, Christopher
Herrmann, Hannes
Brandt, Amelie
Schröppel, Bernd
Schulte-Kemna, Lena
Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title_full Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title_fullStr Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title_short Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
title_sort feasibility analysis of ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.038
work_keys_str_mv AT kachelemartin feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT bettaclucas feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT hofmannchristopher feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT herrmannhannes feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT brandtamelie feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT schroppelbernd feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters
AT schultekemnalena feasibilityanalysisofultrasoundguidedplacementoftunneledhemodialysiscatheters