Cargando…

Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG

Frequency tagging has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for identifying representational-specific neuronal activity in the auditory and visual domains. However, the slow flicker (<30 Hz) applied in conventional frequency tagging studies is highly visible and might entrain endogenous neuronal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minarik, Tamas, Berger, Barbara, Jensen, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37751812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120389
_version_ 1785121329670782976
author Minarik, Tamas
Berger, Barbara
Jensen, Ole
author_facet Minarik, Tamas
Berger, Barbara
Jensen, Ole
author_sort Minarik, Tamas
collection PubMed
description Frequency tagging has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for identifying representational-specific neuronal activity in the auditory and visual domains. However, the slow flicker (<30 Hz) applied in conventional frequency tagging studies is highly visible and might entrain endogenous neuronal oscillations. Hence, stimulation at faster frequencies that is much less visible and does not interfere with endogenous brain oscillatory activity is a promising new tool. In this study, we set out to examine the optimal stimulation parameters of rapid frequency tagging (RFT/RIFT) with magnetoencephalography (MEG) by quantifying the effects of stimulation frequency, size and position of the flickering patch. Rapid frequency tagging using flickers above 50 Hz results in almost invisible stimulation which does not interfere with slower endogenous oscillations; however, the signal is weaker as compared to tagging at slower frequencies so certainty over the optimal parameters of stimulation delivery are crucial. The here presented results examining the frequency range between 60 Hz and 96 Hz suggest that RFT induces brain responses with decreasing strength up to about 84 Hz. In addition, even at the smallest flicker patch (2°) focally presented RFT induces a significant and measurable oscillatory brain signal (steady state visual evoked potential/field, SSVEP/F) at the stimulation frequency (66 Hz); however, the elicited response increases with patch size. While focal RFT presentation elicits the strongest response, off-centre presentations do generally mainly elicit a measureable response if presented below the horizontal midline. Importantly, the results also revealed considerable individual differences in the neuronal responses to RFT stimulation. Finally, we discuss the comparison of oscillatory measures (coherence and power) and sensor types (planar gradiometers and magnetometers) in order to achieve optimal outcomes. Based on our extensive findings we set forward concrete recommendations for using rapid frequency tagging in human cognitive neuroscience investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105774472023-11-01 Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG Minarik, Tamas Berger, Barbara Jensen, Ole Neuroimage Article Frequency tagging has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for identifying representational-specific neuronal activity in the auditory and visual domains. However, the slow flicker (<30 Hz) applied in conventional frequency tagging studies is highly visible and might entrain endogenous neuronal oscillations. Hence, stimulation at faster frequencies that is much less visible and does not interfere with endogenous brain oscillatory activity is a promising new tool. In this study, we set out to examine the optimal stimulation parameters of rapid frequency tagging (RFT/RIFT) with magnetoencephalography (MEG) by quantifying the effects of stimulation frequency, size and position of the flickering patch. Rapid frequency tagging using flickers above 50 Hz results in almost invisible stimulation which does not interfere with slower endogenous oscillations; however, the signal is weaker as compared to tagging at slower frequencies so certainty over the optimal parameters of stimulation delivery are crucial. The here presented results examining the frequency range between 60 Hz and 96 Hz suggest that RFT induces brain responses with decreasing strength up to about 84 Hz. In addition, even at the smallest flicker patch (2°) focally presented RFT induces a significant and measurable oscillatory brain signal (steady state visual evoked potential/field, SSVEP/F) at the stimulation frequency (66 Hz); however, the elicited response increases with patch size. While focal RFT presentation elicits the strongest response, off-centre presentations do generally mainly elicit a measureable response if presented below the horizontal midline. Importantly, the results also revealed considerable individual differences in the neuronal responses to RFT stimulation. Finally, we discuss the comparison of oscillatory measures (coherence and power) and sensor types (planar gradiometers and magnetometers) in order to achieve optimal outcomes. Based on our extensive findings we set forward concrete recommendations for using rapid frequency tagging in human cognitive neuroscience investigations. Academic Press 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10577447/ /pubmed/37751812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120389 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Minarik, Tamas
Berger, Barbara
Jensen, Ole
Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title_full Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title_fullStr Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title_full_unstemmed Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title_short Optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using MEG
title_sort optimal parameters for rapid (invisible) frequency tagging using meg
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37751812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120389
work_keys_str_mv AT minariktamas optimalparametersforrapidinvisiblefrequencytaggingusingmeg
AT bergerbarbara optimalparametersforrapidinvisiblefrequencytaggingusingmeg
AT jensenole optimalparametersforrapidinvisiblefrequencytaggingusingmeg