Cargando…
Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness
BACKGROUND: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [[Formula: see text] O(2)peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold sta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37850043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020 |
_version_ | 1785121340090482688 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Mikkel T. Rømer, Tue Højgaard, Amalie Husted, Karina Sørensen, Kasper Schmidt, Samuel E. Dela, Flemming Helge, Jørn W. |
author_facet | Hansen, Mikkel T. Rømer, Tue Højgaard, Amalie Husted, Karina Sørensen, Kasper Schmidt, Samuel E. Dela, Flemming Helge, Jørn W. |
author_sort | Hansen, Mikkel T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [[Formula: see text] O(2)peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard procedure for determination of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak but has methodological challenges as it is time-consuming and requires specialized equipment and trained professionals. Seismofit is a chest-mounted medical device for estimating [Formula: see text] O(2)peak at rest using seismocardiography. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak estimation in a healthy population. METHODS: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak with Seismofit (×2) and Polar Fitness Test (PFT) in randomized order and performed a graded CPET on a cycle ergometer with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. RESULTS: Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak showed a significant bias of –3.1 ± 2.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±10.8 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) compared to CPET. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12.0%. Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak had a coefficient of variation of 4.5% ± 1.3% and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 between test days and a bias of 0.0 ± 0.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) with 95% LoA of ±1.6 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) in test–retest. In addition, Seismofit showed a 2.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) smaller difference in 95% LoA than PFT compared to CPET. CONCLUSION: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak. However, based on the measurement error and MAPE >10%, the Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak estimation model needs further improvement to be considered for use in clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10577491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105774912023-10-17 Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness Hansen, Mikkel T. Rømer, Tue Højgaard, Amalie Husted, Karina Sørensen, Kasper Schmidt, Samuel E. Dela, Flemming Helge, Jørn W. Cardiovasc Digit Health J Original Article BACKGROUND: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [[Formula: see text] O(2)peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard procedure for determination of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak but has methodological challenges as it is time-consuming and requires specialized equipment and trained professionals. Seismofit is a chest-mounted medical device for estimating [Formula: see text] O(2)peak at rest using seismocardiography. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak estimation in a healthy population. METHODS: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak with Seismofit (×2) and Polar Fitness Test (PFT) in randomized order and performed a graded CPET on a cycle ergometer with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. RESULTS: Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak showed a significant bias of –3.1 ± 2.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±10.8 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) compared to CPET. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12.0%. Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak had a coefficient of variation of 4.5% ± 1.3% and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 between test days and a bias of 0.0 ± 0.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) with 95% LoA of ±1.6 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) in test–retest. In addition, Seismofit showed a 2.4 mL·min(–1)·kg(–1) smaller difference in 95% LoA than PFT compared to CPET. CONCLUSION: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2)peak. However, based on the measurement error and MAPE >10%, the Seismofit [Formula: see text] O(2)peak estimation model needs further improvement to be considered for use in clinical settings. Elsevier 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10577491/ /pubmed/37850043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020 Text en © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hansen, Mikkel T. Rømer, Tue Højgaard, Amalie Husted, Karina Sørensen, Kasper Schmidt, Samuel E. Dela, Flemming Helge, Jørn W. Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title | Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_full | Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_short | Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_sort | validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37850043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenmikkelt validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT rømertue validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT højgaardamalie validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT hustedkarina validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT sørensenkasper validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT schmidtsamuele validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT delaflemming validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness AT helgejørnw validityandreliabilityofseismocardiographyfortheestimationofcardiorespiratoryfitness |