Cargando…

Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey

INTRODUCTION: Complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden are registered in the well‐established Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery, GynOp. The aim of this study was to analyze interrater reliability in assessing complications according to the methods in GynOp, and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Elin, Liv, Per, Strandell, Annika, Ehrström, Sophia, Pålsson, Mathias, Darelius, Anna, Magarakis, Leonidas, Idahl, Annika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14661
_version_ 1785121366616309760
author Collins, Elin
Liv, Per
Strandell, Annika
Ehrström, Sophia
Pålsson, Mathias
Darelius, Anna
Magarakis, Leonidas
Idahl, Annika
author_facet Collins, Elin
Liv, Per
Strandell, Annika
Ehrström, Sophia
Pålsson, Mathias
Darelius, Anna
Magarakis, Leonidas
Idahl, Annika
author_sort Collins, Elin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden are registered in the well‐established Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery, GynOp. The aim of this study was to analyze interrater reliability in assessing complications according to the methods in GynOp, and to explore physicians' perceptions of registering complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A digital survey was sent to gynecologists and residents in gynecology in Sweden. Participating clinics were recruited through the Swedish network for national clinical studies in Obstetrics and Gynecology, SNAKS. Twenty fictional cases, intended to represent normal postoperative course, failure to cure, and varying degrees of complications, were developed by the research group. The clinical scenarios included abdominal and laparoscopic surgery of the uterus and adnexa, vaginal hysterectomies, as well as hysteroscopy. The respondents graded each case on the presence of a complication (yes/no). Type of complication, severity, and what action the complication required according to Clavien‐Dindo was registered if a complication was acknowledged, according to the method in GynOp. Interrater reliability and the opinions of the respondents were presented descriptively. More than 80% of respondents making the same assessment was considered as agreement. RESULTS: The response rate was 41%, with 104 responding physicians from 16 gynecological clinics. Type and severity of complication was considered relevant to register by 88% and 89% of respondents, respectively. Agreement on whether the case described a complication was >80% in 85% (17/20) of cases and agreement using the Clavien‐Dindo classification was >90% in 80% (16/20) of cases. There was high agreement in assessments of classically severe complications, such as pulmonary embolism and ureteral damage, in both presence of complication and severity, as well as Clavien‐Dindo (>90% for all methods). Cases with agreement <80% on whether the case described a complication were bordering between normal postoperative course and minor complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides validation for the methods used to register complications after gynecological surgery according to the GynOp register, including the use of Clavien‐Dindo in gynecology. However, the results indicate a need to define what should be considered symptoms inherent to each type of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105776292023-10-17 Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey Collins, Elin Liv, Per Strandell, Annika Ehrström, Sophia Pålsson, Mathias Darelius, Anna Magarakis, Leonidas Idahl, Annika Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Gynecological Surgery INTRODUCTION: Complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden are registered in the well‐established Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery, GynOp. The aim of this study was to analyze interrater reliability in assessing complications according to the methods in GynOp, and to explore physicians' perceptions of registering complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A digital survey was sent to gynecologists and residents in gynecology in Sweden. Participating clinics were recruited through the Swedish network for national clinical studies in Obstetrics and Gynecology, SNAKS. Twenty fictional cases, intended to represent normal postoperative course, failure to cure, and varying degrees of complications, were developed by the research group. The clinical scenarios included abdominal and laparoscopic surgery of the uterus and adnexa, vaginal hysterectomies, as well as hysteroscopy. The respondents graded each case on the presence of a complication (yes/no). Type of complication, severity, and what action the complication required according to Clavien‐Dindo was registered if a complication was acknowledged, according to the method in GynOp. Interrater reliability and the opinions of the respondents were presented descriptively. More than 80% of respondents making the same assessment was considered as agreement. RESULTS: The response rate was 41%, with 104 responding physicians from 16 gynecological clinics. Type and severity of complication was considered relevant to register by 88% and 89% of respondents, respectively. Agreement on whether the case described a complication was >80% in 85% (17/20) of cases and agreement using the Clavien‐Dindo classification was >90% in 80% (16/20) of cases. There was high agreement in assessments of classically severe complications, such as pulmonary embolism and ureteral damage, in both presence of complication and severity, as well as Clavien‐Dindo (>90% for all methods). Cases with agreement <80% on whether the case described a complication were bordering between normal postoperative course and minor complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides validation for the methods used to register complications after gynecological surgery according to the GynOp register, including the use of Clavien‐Dindo in gynecology. However, the results indicate a need to define what should be considered symptoms inherent to each type of surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10577629/ /pubmed/37614120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14661 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Gynecological Surgery
Collins, Elin
Liv, Per
Strandell, Annika
Ehrström, Sophia
Pålsson, Mathias
Darelius, Anna
Magarakis, Leonidas
Idahl, Annika
Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title_full Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title_fullStr Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title_full_unstemmed Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title_short Physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in Sweden: The GYNCOM survey
title_sort physicians' assessment of complications after gynecological surgery in sweden: the gyncom survey
topic Gynecological Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14661
work_keys_str_mv AT collinselin physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT livper physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT strandellannika physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT ehrstromsophia physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT palssonmathias physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT dareliusanna physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT magarakisleonidas physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey
AT idahlannika physiciansassessmentofcomplicationsaftergynecologicalsurgeryinswedenthegyncomsurvey