Cargando…

Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagen, Joachim Støren, Smedslund, Geir, Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth, Habberstad, Andreas, Kjeken, Ingvild, Dagfinrud, Hanne, Moe, Rikke Helene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309
_version_ 1785121379923787776
author Sagen, Joachim Støren
Smedslund, Geir
Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
Habberstad, Andreas
Kjeken, Ingvild
Dagfinrud, Hanne
Moe, Rikke Helene
author_facet Sagen, Joachim Støren
Smedslund, Geir
Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
Habberstad, Andreas
Kjeken, Ingvild
Dagfinrud, Hanne
Moe, Rikke Helene
author_sort Sagen, Joachim Støren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regarding structure, process and outcomes. More specifically, the aim was to explore barriers and facilitators to successful PE, how persons are engaged in the process and summarise reported consequences. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. Primary studies, published between 7 July 2005 and 4 October 2022, were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers extracted data about PE (eg, attributes of PE settings, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes to PE) and the first author coded the extracted data into structural, processual and outcome themes. RESULTS: Of 8588 identified records, 37 studies were eligible. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe (n=19; 51%) and North America (n=13; 35%). Structures that ensure sufficient stakeholder representativeness and PE knowledge through education may facilitate the PE process further, regardless of the environmental setting. Interpersonal relationships with uneven power dynamics were reported as noteworthy processual barriers to meaningful PE, while clearly described roles and tasks were reported as important facilitators. In contrast to hard outcomes with operationalised PE effects, the most noteworthy outcomes of PE were reported as soft processual consequences such as patient representatives improving their self-esteem and feeling valued. CONCLUSIONS: Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies exploring hard and operationalised PE outcomes on healthcare services and patients receiving healthcare. The PE process may be facilitated by dedicated finances to PE education and by ensuring sufficient stakeholder representativeness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10577732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105777322023-10-17 Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review Sagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regarding structure, process and outcomes. More specifically, the aim was to explore barriers and facilitators to successful PE, how persons are engaged in the process and summarise reported consequences. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. Primary studies, published between 7 July 2005 and 4 October 2022, were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers extracted data about PE (eg, attributes of PE settings, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes to PE) and the first author coded the extracted data into structural, processual and outcome themes. RESULTS: Of 8588 identified records, 37 studies were eligible. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe (n=19; 51%) and North America (n=13; 35%). Structures that ensure sufficient stakeholder representativeness and PE knowledge through education may facilitate the PE process further, regardless of the environmental setting. Interpersonal relationships with uneven power dynamics were reported as noteworthy processual barriers to meaningful PE, while clearly described roles and tasks were reported as important facilitators. In contrast to hard outcomes with operationalised PE effects, the most noteworthy outcomes of PE were reported as soft processual consequences such as patient representatives improving their self-esteem and feeling valued. CONCLUSIONS: Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies exploring hard and operationalised PE outcomes on healthcare services and patients receiving healthcare. The PE process may be facilitated by dedicated finances to PE education and by ensuring sufficient stakeholder representativeness. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10577732/ /pubmed/37369560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sagen, Joachim Støren
Smedslund, Geir
Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
Habberstad, Andreas
Kjeken, Ingvild
Dagfinrud, Hanne
Moe, Rikke Helene
Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title_full Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title_short Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
title_sort patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309
work_keys_str_mv AT sagenjoachimstøren patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT smedslundgeir patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT simonsenannelisabeth patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT habberstadandreas patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT kjekeningvild patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT dagfinrudhanne patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview
AT moerikkehelene patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview