Cargando…
Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regard...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309 |
_version_ | 1785121379923787776 |
---|---|
author | Sagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene |
author_facet | Sagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene |
author_sort | Sagen, Joachim Støren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regarding structure, process and outcomes. More specifically, the aim was to explore barriers and facilitators to successful PE, how persons are engaged in the process and summarise reported consequences. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. Primary studies, published between 7 July 2005 and 4 October 2022, were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers extracted data about PE (eg, attributes of PE settings, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes to PE) and the first author coded the extracted data into structural, processual and outcome themes. RESULTS: Of 8588 identified records, 37 studies were eligible. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe (n=19; 51%) and North America (n=13; 35%). Structures that ensure sufficient stakeholder representativeness and PE knowledge through education may facilitate the PE process further, regardless of the environmental setting. Interpersonal relationships with uneven power dynamics were reported as noteworthy processual barriers to meaningful PE, while clearly described roles and tasks were reported as important facilitators. In contrast to hard outcomes with operationalised PE effects, the most noteworthy outcomes of PE were reported as soft processual consequences such as patient representatives improving their self-esteem and feeling valued. CONCLUSIONS: Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies exploring hard and operationalised PE outcomes on healthcare services and patients receiving healthcare. The PE process may be facilitated by dedicated finances to PE education and by ensuring sufficient stakeholder representativeness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10577732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105777322023-10-17 Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review Sagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regarding structure, process and outcomes. More specifically, the aim was to explore barriers and facilitators to successful PE, how persons are engaged in the process and summarise reported consequences. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. Primary studies, published between 7 July 2005 and 4 October 2022, were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers extracted data about PE (eg, attributes of PE settings, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes to PE) and the first author coded the extracted data into structural, processual and outcome themes. RESULTS: Of 8588 identified records, 37 studies were eligible. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe (n=19; 51%) and North America (n=13; 35%). Structures that ensure sufficient stakeholder representativeness and PE knowledge through education may facilitate the PE process further, regardless of the environmental setting. Interpersonal relationships with uneven power dynamics were reported as noteworthy processual barriers to meaningful PE, while clearly described roles and tasks were reported as important facilitators. In contrast to hard outcomes with operationalised PE effects, the most noteworthy outcomes of PE were reported as soft processual consequences such as patient representatives improving their self-esteem and feeling valued. CONCLUSIONS: Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies exploring hard and operationalised PE outcomes on healthcare services and patients receiving healthcare. The PE process may be facilitated by dedicated finances to PE education and by ensuring sufficient stakeholder representativeness. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10577732/ /pubmed/37369560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Sagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title | Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title_full | Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title_short | Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
title_sort | patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagenjoachimstøren patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT smedslundgeir patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT simonsenannelisabeth patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT habberstadandreas patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT kjekeningvild patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT dagfinrudhanne patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview AT moerikkehelene patientengagementinthedevelopmentanddeliveryofhealthcareservicesasystematicscopingreview |