Cargando…

Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures

BACKGROUND: As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Liangpin, Yuan, Liyun, Yang, Kun, Wu, Yanan, Hua, Xia, Wang, Yan, Yuan, Xiaoyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0
_version_ 1785121430403284992
author Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
author_facet Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
author_sort Li, Liangpin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients. RESULTS: The Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411). CONCLUSION: The study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105780002023-10-17 Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures Li, Liangpin Yuan, Liyun Yang, Kun Wu, Yanan Hua, Xia Wang, Yan Yuan, Xiaoyong BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients. RESULTS: The Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411). CONCLUSION: The study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes. BioMed Central 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10578000/ /pubmed/37845633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_full Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_short Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_sort comparative analysis of iol power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for fs-lasik and smile procedures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liliangpin comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT yuanliyun comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT yangkun comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT wuyanan comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT huaxia comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT wangyan comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT yuanxiaoyong comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures