Cargando…

Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

PURPOSE: We evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of 15-µg bimatoprost implant (higher dose than the currently approved product) compared with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Randomized, phase 3,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christie, William C, Basha, Mahdi M, Ho, Quoc, Kim, Kimmie, Craven, E Randy, Kolko, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37850049
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S427976
_version_ 1785121460201717760
author Christie, William C
Basha, Mahdi M
Ho, Quoc
Kim, Kimmie
Craven, E Randy
Kolko, Miriam
author_facet Christie, William C
Basha, Mahdi M
Ho, Quoc
Kim, Kimmie
Craven, E Randy
Kolko, Miriam
author_sort Christie, William C
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of 15-µg bimatoprost implant (higher dose than the currently approved product) compared with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Randomized, phase 3, 12-month, multicenter, paired-eye, patient- and efficacy evaluator–masked noninferiority study. Patients with inadequate IOP control were randomized to receive 360° SLT (day 1) or up to 3 administrations of 15-µg bimatoprost implant (day 4, weeks 16 and 32) in the primary eye and the alternative treatment in the contralateral eye. The primary endpoint was IOP change from baseline at weeks 4, 12, and 24. RESULTS: At weeks 4, 12, and 24, mean IOP change from baseline ranged from −7.01 to −6.65 mm Hg in implant-treated eyes (N=138) and −6.45 to −6.26 mm Hg in SLT-treated eyes (N=138). Differences in IOP change from baseline ranged from −0.70 to −0.25 mm Hg favoring implant; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference (implant minus SLT) was <1.0 mm Hg at all 3 visits. The probability of requiring no additional (rescue) IOP-lowering treatment in implant-treated versus SLT-treated eyes was 93.6% versus 86.5% at day 180 and 74.6% versus 77.1% at day 360. Corneal endothelial cell loss was more common in implant-treated eyes and typically occurred after repeated implant administration. CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost implant 15 µg met prespecified criteria for statistical and clinical noninferiority to SLT in lowering IOP, and after 1, 2, or 3 administrations, demonstrated a duration of IOP lowering similar to SLT. Bimatoprost implant 15 µg was associated with corneal adverse events in some patients, especially after repeated administrations at a fixed interval, and has been discontinued from development. A lower dose strength of implant (bimatoprost implant 10 µg, Durysta) is US Food and Drug Administration–approved for single administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105781662023-10-17 Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Christie, William C Basha, Mahdi M Ho, Quoc Kim, Kimmie Craven, E Randy Kolko, Miriam Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: We evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of 15-µg bimatoprost implant (higher dose than the currently approved product) compared with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Randomized, phase 3, 12-month, multicenter, paired-eye, patient- and efficacy evaluator–masked noninferiority study. Patients with inadequate IOP control were randomized to receive 360° SLT (day 1) or up to 3 administrations of 15-µg bimatoprost implant (day 4, weeks 16 and 32) in the primary eye and the alternative treatment in the contralateral eye. The primary endpoint was IOP change from baseline at weeks 4, 12, and 24. RESULTS: At weeks 4, 12, and 24, mean IOP change from baseline ranged from −7.01 to −6.65 mm Hg in implant-treated eyes (N=138) and −6.45 to −6.26 mm Hg in SLT-treated eyes (N=138). Differences in IOP change from baseline ranged from −0.70 to −0.25 mm Hg favoring implant; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference (implant minus SLT) was <1.0 mm Hg at all 3 visits. The probability of requiring no additional (rescue) IOP-lowering treatment in implant-treated versus SLT-treated eyes was 93.6% versus 86.5% at day 180 and 74.6% versus 77.1% at day 360. Corneal endothelial cell loss was more common in implant-treated eyes and typically occurred after repeated implant administration. CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost implant 15 µg met prespecified criteria for statistical and clinical noninferiority to SLT in lowering IOP, and after 1, 2, or 3 administrations, demonstrated a duration of IOP lowering similar to SLT. Bimatoprost implant 15 µg was associated with corneal adverse events in some patients, especially after repeated administrations at a fixed interval, and has been discontinued from development. A lower dose strength of implant (bimatoprost implant 10 µg, Durysta) is US Food and Drug Administration–approved for single administration. Dove 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10578166/ /pubmed/37850049 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S427976 Text en © 2023 Christie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Christie, William C
Basha, Mahdi M
Ho, Quoc
Kim, Kimmie
Craven, E Randy
Kolko, Miriam
Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title_full Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title_fullStr Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title_short Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
title_sort phase 3, randomized study comparing intracameral bimatoprost implant 15 µg and selective laser trabeculectomy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37850049
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S427976
work_keys_str_mv AT christiewilliamc phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT bashamahdim phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT hoquoc phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT kimkimmie phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT cravenerandy phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT kolkomiriam phase3randomizedstudycomparingintracameralbimatoprostimplant15μgandselectivelasertrabeculectomyinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension