Cargando…
Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators includ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554 |
_version_ | 1785121558304391168 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Ze-Lin Zhou, Xiong Peng, Dong |
author_facet | Wen, Ze-Lin Zhou, Xiong Peng, Dong |
author_sort | Wen, Ze-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RevMan 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Stata V16.0 were used for statistical analysis. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias of the included studies. Ten articles involving 2740 patients were included. RDW was a prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38–2.37, P < .01) and DFS (hazard ratio = 1.99, I(2) = 26%, 95% CI = 1.53–2.58, P < .01) for GC patients. Meanwhile, there were some differences between the high RDW group and the low RDW group. We found more patients older than 60 years old (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.08–6.13, P = .03), larger tumor diameter (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.33–2.85, P < .01) and later T stage (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.07–3.42, P = .03) in the high RDW group than the low RDW group. No statistic difference was found in gender, N stage, tumor node metastasis stage, vascular invasion, differentiation, and adjuvant therapy between the 2 groups (P > .05). RDW was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS of GC patients. High RDW level were strongly associated with poor survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10578666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105786662023-10-17 Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis Wen, Ze-Lin Zhou, Xiong Peng, Dong Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RevMan 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Stata V16.0 were used for statistical analysis. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias of the included studies. Ten articles involving 2740 patients were included. RDW was a prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38–2.37, P < .01) and DFS (hazard ratio = 1.99, I(2) = 26%, 95% CI = 1.53–2.58, P < .01) for GC patients. Meanwhile, there were some differences between the high RDW group and the low RDW group. We found more patients older than 60 years old (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.08–6.13, P = .03), larger tumor diameter (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.33–2.85, P < .01) and later T stage (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.07–3.42, P = .03) in the high RDW group than the low RDW group. No statistic difference was found in gender, N stage, tumor node metastasis stage, vascular invasion, differentiation, and adjuvant therapy between the 2 groups (P > .05). RDW was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS of GC patients. High RDW level were strongly associated with poor survival. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10578666/ /pubmed/37832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 5700 Wen, Ze-Lin Zhou, Xiong Peng, Dong Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title | Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title_full | Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title_fullStr | Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title_short | Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis |
title_sort | red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: a pooling-up analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenzelin redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis AT zhouxiong redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis AT pengdong redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis |