Cargando…

Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis

Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Ze-Lin, Zhou, Xiong, Peng, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554
_version_ 1785121558304391168
author Wen, Ze-Lin
Zhou, Xiong
Peng, Dong
author_facet Wen, Ze-Lin
Zhou, Xiong
Peng, Dong
author_sort Wen, Ze-Lin
collection PubMed
description Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RevMan 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Stata V16.0 were used for statistical analysis. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias of the included studies. Ten articles involving 2740 patients were included. RDW was a prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38–2.37, P < .01) and DFS (hazard ratio = 1.99, I(2) = 26%, 95% CI = 1.53–2.58, P < .01) for GC patients. Meanwhile, there were some differences between the high RDW group and the low RDW group. We found more patients older than 60 years old (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.08–6.13, P = .03), larger tumor diameter (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.33–2.85, P < .01) and later T stage (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.07–3.42, P = .03) in the high RDW group than the low RDW group. No statistic difference was found in gender, N stage, tumor node metastasis stage, vascular invasion, differentiation, and adjuvant therapy between the 2 groups (P > .05). RDW was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS of GC patients. High RDW level were strongly associated with poor survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105786662023-10-17 Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis Wen, Ze-Lin Zhou, Xiong Peng, Dong Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Our study aims to investigate whether preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has a prognostic value for patients after gastric cancer (GC) surgery. We searched articles in 3 databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on May 16th, 2022. The prognostic indicators included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RevMan 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Stata V16.0 were used for statistical analysis. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias of the included studies. Ten articles involving 2740 patients were included. RDW was a prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38–2.37, P < .01) and DFS (hazard ratio = 1.99, I(2) = 26%, 95% CI = 1.53–2.58, P < .01) for GC patients. Meanwhile, there were some differences between the high RDW group and the low RDW group. We found more patients older than 60 years old (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.08–6.13, P = .03), larger tumor diameter (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.33–2.85, P < .01) and later T stage (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.07–3.42, P = .03) in the high RDW group than the low RDW group. No statistic difference was found in gender, N stage, tumor node metastasis stage, vascular invasion, differentiation, and adjuvant therapy between the 2 groups (P > .05). RDW was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS of GC patients. High RDW level were strongly associated with poor survival. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10578666/ /pubmed/37832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 5700
Wen, Ze-Lin
Zhou, Xiong
Peng, Dong
Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title_full Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title_fullStr Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title_full_unstemmed Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title_short Red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: A pooling-up analysis
title_sort red blood cell distribution width has a prognostic value for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: a pooling-up analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035554
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzelin redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis
AT zhouxiong redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis
AT pengdong redbloodcelldistributionwidthhasaprognosticvalueforgastriccancerpatientsaftergastrectomyapoolingupanalysis