Cargando…

Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review

The number of surgical procedures in the world is large and in Brazil it has been expressing a growth trend higher than the population growth. In this context, perioperative risk assessment safeguards the optimization of the outcomes sought by the procedures. For this evaluation, anamnesis and physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE, CORRÊA, LUISA DE MENDONÇA, PROCÓPIO, RICARDO JAYME, CARMO, GABRIEL ASSIS LOPES DO, NAVARRO, TULIO PINHO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35319563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223124
_version_ 1785121587732676608
author MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE
CORRÊA, LUISA DE MENDONÇA
PROCÓPIO, RICARDO JAYME
CARMO, GABRIEL ASSIS LOPES DO
NAVARRO, TULIO PINHO
author_facet MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE
CORRÊA, LUISA DE MENDONÇA
PROCÓPIO, RICARDO JAYME
CARMO, GABRIEL ASSIS LOPES DO
NAVARRO, TULIO PINHO
author_sort MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE
collection PubMed
description The number of surgical procedures in the world is large and in Brazil it has been expressing a growth trend higher than the population growth. In this context, perioperative risk assessment safeguards the optimization of the outcomes sought by the procedures. For this evaluation, anamnesis and physical examination constitute an irreplaceable initial stage which may or may not be followed by complementary exams, interventions for clinical stabilization and application of risk estimation tools. The use of these tools can be very useful in order to obtain objective data for decision making by weighing surgical risk and benefit. Global and cardiovascular risk assessments are of greatest interest in the preoperative period, however information about their methods is scattered in the literature. Some tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) are more widely known, while others are less known but can provide valuable information. Here, the main indices, scores and calculators that address general and cardiovascular perioperative risk were detailed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105787962023-10-17 Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE CORRÊA, LUISA DE MENDONÇA PROCÓPIO, RICARDO JAYME CARMO, GABRIEL ASSIS LOPES DO NAVARRO, TULIO PINHO Rev Col Bras Cir Review Article The number of surgical procedures in the world is large and in Brazil it has been expressing a growth trend higher than the population growth. In this context, perioperative risk assessment safeguards the optimization of the outcomes sought by the procedures. For this evaluation, anamnesis and physical examination constitute an irreplaceable initial stage which may or may not be followed by complementary exams, interventions for clinical stabilization and application of risk estimation tools. The use of these tools can be very useful in order to obtain objective data for decision making by weighing surgical risk and benefit. Global and cardiovascular risk assessments are of greatest interest in the preoperative period, however information about their methods is scattered in the literature. Some tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) are more widely known, while others are less known but can provide valuable information. Here, the main indices, scores and calculators that address general and cardiovascular perioperative risk were detailed. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10578796/ /pubmed/35319563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223124 Text en © 2022 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Review Article
MORAES, CAIO MAZZONETTO TEÓFILO DE
CORRÊA, LUISA DE MENDONÇA
PROCÓPIO, RICARDO JAYME
CARMO, GABRIEL ASSIS LOPES DO
NAVARRO, TULIO PINHO
Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title_full Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title_fullStr Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title_short Tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
title_sort tools and scores for general and cardiovascular perioperative risk assessment: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35319563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223124
work_keys_str_mv AT moraescaiomazzonettoteofilode toolsandscoresforgeneralandcardiovascularperioperativeriskassessmentanarrativereview
AT correaluisademendonca toolsandscoresforgeneralandcardiovascularperioperativeriskassessmentanarrativereview
AT procopioricardojayme toolsandscoresforgeneralandcardiovascularperioperativeriskassessmentanarrativereview
AT carmogabrielassislopesdo toolsandscoresforgeneralandcardiovascularperioperativeriskassessmentanarrativereview
AT navarrotuliopinho toolsandscoresforgeneralandcardiovascularperioperativeriskassessmentanarrativereview