Cargando…

Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether virtual reality (VR) experience is associated with decreased pain sensation among patients who undergo rigid cystoscopy under local anesthesia. METHODS: we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 159 patients who were aleatorily enrolled into two g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO, FREITAS, DANIEL MELECCHI DE OLIVEIRA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223138-en
_version_ 1785121591717265408
author GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO
FREITAS, DANIEL MELECCHI DE OLIVEIRA
author_facet GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO
FREITAS, DANIEL MELECCHI DE OLIVEIRA
author_sort GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether virtual reality (VR) experience is associated with decreased pain sensation among patients who undergo rigid cystoscopy under local anesthesia. METHODS: we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 159 patients who were aleatorily enrolled into two groups: VR and control. VR experience intervention consisted of using a headset with a smartphone adapted to a virtual reality glasses where an app-video was played during the procedure. Main outcomes analyzed were pain, discomfort, heart rate variability, difficulty and duration of the cystoscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: among 159 patients studied (VR group=80 patients; control group=79 patients), the mean age was 63,6 years and 107 (67,3%) were male. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. VR was significantly associated to decreased heart rate variability (6,29 vs 11,09 bpm, P<0,001) and lower duration of the procedure (5,33 vs 8,65 min, P<0,001). Also, when cystoscopies due to double-J extraction were excluded, VR experience was associated with reduced pain on the visual analog score of pain (3,26 vs 4,33 cm, P=0,023). CONCLUSIONS: the use of VR as a distraction therapy while performing outpatient cystoscopies is safe, has no side effects, is associated with less pain and discomfort, and reduces length of procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105788132023-10-17 Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO FREITAS, DANIEL MELECCHI DE OLIVEIRA Rev Col Bras Cir Original Article OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether virtual reality (VR) experience is associated with decreased pain sensation among patients who undergo rigid cystoscopy under local anesthesia. METHODS: we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 159 patients who were aleatorily enrolled into two groups: VR and control. VR experience intervention consisted of using a headset with a smartphone adapted to a virtual reality glasses where an app-video was played during the procedure. Main outcomes analyzed were pain, discomfort, heart rate variability, difficulty and duration of the cystoscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: among 159 patients studied (VR group=80 patients; control group=79 patients), the mean age was 63,6 years and 107 (67,3%) were male. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. VR was significantly associated to decreased heart rate variability (6,29 vs 11,09 bpm, P<0,001) and lower duration of the procedure (5,33 vs 8,65 min, P<0,001). Also, when cystoscopies due to double-J extraction were excluded, VR experience was associated with reduced pain on the visual analog score of pain (3,26 vs 4,33 cm, P=0,023). CONCLUSIONS: the use of VR as a distraction therapy while performing outpatient cystoscopies is safe, has no side effects, is associated with less pain and discomfort, and reduces length of procedure. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10578813/ /pubmed/35584530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223138-en Text en © 2022 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
GOERGEN, DIEGO INÁCIO
FREITAS, DANIEL MELECCHI DE OLIVEIRA
Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title_full Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title_fullStr Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title_short Virtual Reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
title_sort virtual reality as a distraction therapy during cystoscopy: a clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223138-en
work_keys_str_mv AT goergendiegoinacio virtualrealityasadistractiontherapyduringcystoscopyaclinicaltrial
AT freitasdanielmelecchideoliveira virtualrealityasadistractiontherapyduringcystoscopyaclinicaltrial