Cargando…
Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063 |
_version_ | 1785121599515525120 |
---|---|
author | AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE FURTADO, MARCELO MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROLL, SERGIO |
author_facet | AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE FURTADO, MARCELO MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROLL, SERGIO |
author_sort | AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September 2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details and rates of 30-day surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions, surgical site infection and hernia recurrence were abstracted. RESULTS: nineteen patients (95% male, mean age 55 years, mean body mass index 28) had 27 hernias repaired (N=8 bilateral). Average operative time was 168.9 ± 49.3min (range 90-240). There were two intraoperative complications all of them were bleeding from the inferior epigastric vessel injuries. Three SSOs occurred (N=2 seromas and N=1 hematoma. After a median 35.7 months follow-up (IQR 13-49), no recurrence has been diagnosed. One patient developed chronic postoperative inguinal pain. CONCLUSIONS: on a small number of selected patients and experienced hands, we found that the use of the robotic platform for repair of recurrent hernias after prior laparoscopic repair appears to be feasible, safe and effective despite being technically demanding. Further studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine if this technique provides any benefits in recurrent inguinal hernia scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10578846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105788462023-10-17 Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE FURTADO, MARCELO MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROLL, SERGIO Rev Col Bras Cir Original Article OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September 2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details and rates of 30-day surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions, surgical site infection and hernia recurrence were abstracted. RESULTS: nineteen patients (95% male, mean age 55 years, mean body mass index 28) had 27 hernias repaired (N=8 bilateral). Average operative time was 168.9 ± 49.3min (range 90-240). There were two intraoperative complications all of them were bleeding from the inferior epigastric vessel injuries. Three SSOs occurred (N=2 seromas and N=1 hematoma. After a median 35.7 months follow-up (IQR 13-49), no recurrence has been diagnosed. One patient developed chronic postoperative inguinal pain. CONCLUSIONS: on a small number of selected patients and experienced hands, we found that the use of the robotic platform for repair of recurrent hernias after prior laparoscopic repair appears to be feasible, safe and effective despite being technically demanding. Further studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine if this technique provides any benefits in recurrent inguinal hernia scenario. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10578846/ /pubmed/35239851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063 Text en © 2022 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE FURTADO, MARCELO MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROLL, SERGIO Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title | Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title_full | Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title_fullStr | Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title_short | Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
title_sort | robotic re-tapp: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amaralpedrohenriquedefreitas roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT pivettalucagiovanniantonio roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT diaseduardorullomaranhao roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT carvalhojoaopaulovenanciode roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT furtadomarcelo roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT malheiroscarlosalberto roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair AT rollsergio roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair |