Cargando…

Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair

OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS, PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO, DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO, CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE, FURTADO, MARCELO, MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO, ROLL, SERGIO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063
_version_ 1785121599515525120
author AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS
PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO
CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE
FURTADO, MARCELO
MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO
ROLL, SERGIO
author_facet AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS
PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO
CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE
FURTADO, MARCELO
MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO
ROLL, SERGIO
author_sort AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September 2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details and rates of 30-day surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions, surgical site infection and hernia recurrence were abstracted. RESULTS: nineteen patients (95% male, mean age 55 years, mean body mass index 28) had 27 hernias repaired (N=8 bilateral). Average operative time was 168.9 ± 49.3min (range 90-240). There were two intraoperative complications all of them were bleeding from the inferior epigastric vessel injuries. Three SSOs occurred (N=2 seromas and N=1 hematoma. After a median 35.7 months follow-up (IQR 13-49), no recurrence has been diagnosed. One patient developed chronic postoperative inguinal pain. CONCLUSIONS: on a small number of selected patients and experienced hands, we found that the use of the robotic platform for repair of recurrent hernias after prior laparoscopic repair appears to be feasible, safe and effective despite being technically demanding. Further studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine if this technique provides any benefits in recurrent inguinal hernia scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105788462023-10-17 Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE FURTADO, MARCELO MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROLL, SERGIO Rev Col Bras Cir Original Article OBJECTIVE: to describe the use of the robotic platform in inguinal hernia recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. METHODS: patients with recurrent inguinal hernias following a laparoscopic repair who have undergone robotic transabdominal preperitoneal between December 2015 through September 2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details and rates of 30-day surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions, surgical site infection and hernia recurrence were abstracted. RESULTS: nineteen patients (95% male, mean age 55 years, mean body mass index 28) had 27 hernias repaired (N=8 bilateral). Average operative time was 168.9 ± 49.3min (range 90-240). There were two intraoperative complications all of them were bleeding from the inferior epigastric vessel injuries. Three SSOs occurred (N=2 seromas and N=1 hematoma. After a median 35.7 months follow-up (IQR 13-49), no recurrence has been diagnosed. One patient developed chronic postoperative inguinal pain. CONCLUSIONS: on a small number of selected patients and experienced hands, we found that the use of the robotic platform for repair of recurrent hernias after prior laparoscopic repair appears to be feasible, safe and effective despite being technically demanding. Further studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine if this technique provides any benefits in recurrent inguinal hernia scenario. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10578846/ /pubmed/35239851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063 Text en © 2022 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
AMARAL, PEDRO HENRIQUE DE FREITAS
PIVETTA, LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
DIAS, EDUARDO RULLO MARANHÃO
CARVALHO, JOÃO PAULO VENANCIO DE
FURTADO, MARCELO
MALHEIROS, CARLOS ALBERTO
ROLL, SERGIO
Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title_full Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title_fullStr Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title_full_unstemmed Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title_short Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
title_sort robotic re-tapp: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063
work_keys_str_mv AT amaralpedrohenriquedefreitas roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT pivettalucagiovanniantonio roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT diaseduardorullomaranhao roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT carvalhojoaopaulovenanciode roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT furtadomarcelo roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT malheiroscarlosalberto roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair
AT rollsergio roboticretappaminimallyinvasivealternativeforthefailedposteriorrepair