Cargando…

The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review

Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant global health challenge, fueled by misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns on social media platforms (SMPs). This study examines the influence of social media on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 vaccination in Asia during the peri-pande...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Flinta, Ziade, Nelly, Jatuworapruk, Kanon, Caballero-Uribe, Carlo V, Khursheed, Tayyeba, Gupta, Latika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e326
_version_ 1785121633177960448
author Rodrigues, Flinta
Ziade, Nelly
Jatuworapruk, Kanon
Caballero-Uribe, Carlo V
Khursheed, Tayyeba
Gupta, Latika
author_facet Rodrigues, Flinta
Ziade, Nelly
Jatuworapruk, Kanon
Caballero-Uribe, Carlo V
Khursheed, Tayyeba
Gupta, Latika
author_sort Rodrigues, Flinta
collection PubMed
description Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant global health challenge, fueled by misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns on social media platforms (SMPs). This study examines the influence of social media on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 vaccination in Asia during the peri-pandemic period. Through a comprehensive analysis of available literature, we aim to elucidate the role of SMPs in shaping vaccination attitudes and behaviors. The findings highlight the detrimental impact of social media on vaccination efforts and provide insights into addressing vaccine hesitancy during this critical period. A narrative review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 26, 2022. Only English-language articles involving human participants from Asian countries were included in this review. Out of the 228 articles identified through the database search, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or negative attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines in Asian countries was found to be high, ranging from 20% to 55% across countries. Notably, reliance on SMPs for vaccine-related information was associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. This trend coincided with the proliferation of misinformation and conspiracy theories that portrayed COVID-19 vaccines as harmful during the pandemic. Similar patterns were observed for other types of vaccines, including polio, measles mumps and rubella, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines. The use of SMPs was also found to be associated with increased fear among caregivers in Asian countries, as well as a 3–4 times higher likelihood of delayed immunization. SMPs negatively impact vaccine intent in Asia due to misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns during the pandemic. However, they can be a powerful tool for healthcare providers and policymakers to promote informed decision-making. Efforts should focus on leveraging SMPs to disseminate reliable information and combat hesitancy, fostering a well-informed and vaccinated population in Asia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10578995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105789952023-10-17 The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review Rodrigues, Flinta Ziade, Nelly Jatuworapruk, Kanon Caballero-Uribe, Carlo V Khursheed, Tayyeba Gupta, Latika J Korean Med Sci Review Article Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant global health challenge, fueled by misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns on social media platforms (SMPs). This study examines the influence of social media on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 vaccination in Asia during the peri-pandemic period. Through a comprehensive analysis of available literature, we aim to elucidate the role of SMPs in shaping vaccination attitudes and behaviors. The findings highlight the detrimental impact of social media on vaccination efforts and provide insights into addressing vaccine hesitancy during this critical period. A narrative review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 26, 2022. Only English-language articles involving human participants from Asian countries were included in this review. Out of the 228 articles identified through the database search, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or negative attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines in Asian countries was found to be high, ranging from 20% to 55% across countries. Notably, reliance on SMPs for vaccine-related information was associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. This trend coincided with the proliferation of misinformation and conspiracy theories that portrayed COVID-19 vaccines as harmful during the pandemic. Similar patterns were observed for other types of vaccines, including polio, measles mumps and rubella, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines. The use of SMPs was also found to be associated with increased fear among caregivers in Asian countries, as well as a 3–4 times higher likelihood of delayed immunization. SMPs negatively impact vaccine intent in Asia due to misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns during the pandemic. However, they can be a powerful tool for healthcare providers and policymakers to promote informed decision-making. Efforts should focus on leveraging SMPs to disseminate reliable information and combat hesitancy, fostering a well-informed and vaccinated population in Asia. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10578995/ /pubmed/37846789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e326 Text en © 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Rodrigues, Flinta
Ziade, Nelly
Jatuworapruk, Kanon
Caballero-Uribe, Carlo V
Khursheed, Tayyeba
Gupta, Latika
The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title_full The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title_short The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review
title_sort impact of social media on vaccination: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e326
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesflinta theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT ziadenelly theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT jatuworaprukkanon theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT caballerouribecarlov theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT khursheedtayyeba theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT guptalatika theimpactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT rodriguesflinta impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT ziadenelly impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT jatuworaprukkanon impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT caballerouribecarlov impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT khursheedtayyeba impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview
AT guptalatika impactofsocialmediaonvaccinationanarrativereview