Cargando…

Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial

Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grillo, Sara, Pujol, Miquel, Miró, Josep M., López-Contreras, Joaquín, Euba, Gorane, Gasch, Oriol, Boix-Palop, Lucia, Garcia-País, Maria José, Pérez-Rodríguez, Maria Teresa, Gomez-Zorrilla, Silvia, Oriol, Isabel, López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo, Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa, San-Juan, Rafael, Aguado, José María, Gioia, Francesca, Iftimie, Simona, Morata, Laura, Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo, García-Pardo, Graciano, Loeches, Belén, Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Álvaro, Goikoetxea, Ane Josune, Gomila-Grange, Aina, Dietl, Beatriz, Berbel, Damaris, Videla, Sebastian, Hereu, Pilar, Padullés, Ariadna, Pallarès, Natalia, Tebé, Cristian, Cuervo, Guillermo, Carratalà, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02569-0
_version_ 1785121635835052032
author Grillo, Sara
Pujol, Miquel
Miró, Josep M.
López-Contreras, Joaquín
Euba, Gorane
Gasch, Oriol
Boix-Palop, Lucia
Garcia-País, Maria José
Pérez-Rodríguez, Maria Teresa
Gomez-Zorrilla, Silvia
Oriol, Isabel
López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo
Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa
San-Juan, Rafael
Aguado, José María
Gioia, Francesca
Iftimie, Simona
Morata, Laura
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Loeches, Belén
Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Álvaro
Goikoetxea, Ane Josune
Gomila-Grange, Aina
Dietl, Beatriz
Berbel, Damaris
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Padullés, Ariadna
Pallarès, Natalia
Tebé, Cristian
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
author_facet Grillo, Sara
Pujol, Miquel
Miró, Josep M.
López-Contreras, Joaquín
Euba, Gorane
Gasch, Oriol
Boix-Palop, Lucia
Garcia-País, Maria José
Pérez-Rodríguez, Maria Teresa
Gomez-Zorrilla, Silvia
Oriol, Isabel
López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo
Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa
San-Juan, Rafael
Aguado, José María
Gioia, Francesca
Iftimie, Simona
Morata, Laura
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Loeches, Belén
Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Álvaro
Goikoetxea, Ane Josune
Gomila-Grange, Aina
Dietl, Beatriz
Berbel, Damaris
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Padullés, Ariadna
Pallarès, Natalia
Tebé, Cristian
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
author_sort Grillo, Sara
collection PubMed
description Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III–IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), –5.95–16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105790522023-10-18 Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial Grillo, Sara Pujol, Miquel Miró, Josep M. López-Contreras, Joaquín Euba, Gorane Gasch, Oriol Boix-Palop, Lucia Garcia-País, Maria José Pérez-Rodríguez, Maria Teresa Gomez-Zorrilla, Silvia Oriol, Isabel López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa San-Juan, Rafael Aguado, José María Gioia, Francesca Iftimie, Simona Morata, Laura Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo García-Pardo, Graciano Loeches, Belén Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Álvaro Goikoetxea, Ane Josune Gomila-Grange, Aina Dietl, Beatriz Berbel, Damaris Videla, Sebastian Hereu, Pilar Padullés, Ariadna Pallarès, Natalia Tebé, Cristian Cuervo, Guillermo Carratalà, Jordi Nat Med Article Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III–IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), –5.95–16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-10-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10579052/ /pubmed/37783969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02569-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Grillo, Sara
Pujol, Miquel
Miró, Josep M.
López-Contreras, Joaquín
Euba, Gorane
Gasch, Oriol
Boix-Palop, Lucia
Garcia-País, Maria José
Pérez-Rodríguez, Maria Teresa
Gomez-Zorrilla, Silvia
Oriol, Isabel
López-Cortés, Luis Eduardo
Pedro-Botet, Maria Luisa
San-Juan, Rafael
Aguado, José María
Gioia, Francesca
Iftimie, Simona
Morata, Laura
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Loeches, Belén
Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Álvaro
Goikoetxea, Ane Josune
Gomila-Grange, Aina
Dietl, Beatriz
Berbel, Damaris
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Padullés, Ariadna
Pallarès, Natalia
Tebé, Cristian
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title_full Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title_short Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
title_sort cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02569-0
work_keys_str_mv AT grillosara cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT pujolmiquel cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT mirojosepm cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT lopezcontrerasjoaquin cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT eubagorane cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT gaschoriol cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT boixpaloplucia cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT garciapaismariajose cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT perezrodriguezmariateresa cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT gomezzorrillasilvia cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT oriolisabel cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT lopezcortesluiseduardo cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT pedrobotetmarialuisa cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT sanjuanrafael cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT aguadojosemaria cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT gioiafrancesca cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT iftimiesimona cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT moratalaura cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT joversaenzalfredo cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT garciapardograciano cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT loechesbelen cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT izquierdocardenasalvaro cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT goikoetxeaanejosune cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT gomilagrangeaina cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT dietlbeatriz cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT berbeldamaris cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT videlasebastian cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT hereupilar cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT padullesariadna cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT pallaresnatalia cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT tebecristian cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT cuervoguillermo cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT carratalajordi cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial
AT cloxacillinplusfosfomycinversuscloxacillinaloneformethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaarandomizedtrial