Cargando…
深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of applying deep learning (DL) algorithm in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out, covering 600 corneal fluorescein staining photos acquired in the Contact Lens Clinic, West China Hospital,...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
四川大学学报(医学版)编辑部
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37866945 http://dx.doi.org/10.12182/20230960104 |
_version_ | 1785121639257604096 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of applying deep learning (DL) algorithm in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out, covering 600 corneal fluorescein staining photos acquired in the Contact Lens Clinic, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2020 and 2022. Out of the 600 photos, 500 were used to construct the algorithm and the remaining 100 were used for the validation of the algorithm and a comparative analysis of the difference in grading accuracy (ACC) and the length of diagnostic time between artificial intelligence (AI) and optometry students. One month after finishing the first grading analysis, assessment by AI and optometry students was conducted for a second time and results from the two rounds of assessment were compared to examine the intrarater agreement (kappa value) of the two analyses. The grading analysis results of 3 experienced optometrists were used as the gold standard in the study. RESULTS: Findings of the cross validation with the complete dataset, the training dataset, and the test dataset showed that ResNet34 had the highest predictive accuracy among four DL models. ResNet34 DL model achieved an accuracy of 93.0%, sensitivity of 89.5%, and specificity of 89.6% in the grading of corneal staining. In the comparison of the grading accuracy of AI and two optometry students, AI showed better accuracy, with the respective grading accuracy being 87.0%, 78.0%, and 52.0% for AI, student 1, and student 2 (P(ACC)=0.001). In addition, the average diagnostic time of AI was shorter than that of optometry students (t(AI)=1.00 s, t(S1)=11.86 s, t(S2)=13.25 s, P(t)=0.001). In the comparative analysis of the intrarater agreement between the two assessments, AI (kappa(AI)=0.658, P(AI)=0.001) achieved better consistency than the two optometry students did (kappa(S1)=0.575, P(S1)=0.001; kappa(S2)=0.609, P(S2)=0.001). CONCLUSION: Applying deep learning algorithms in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining has considerable feasibility and clinical value. In the performance comparison between AI and optometry students, AI achieved higher accuracy and better consistency, which indicates that AI has potential application value for assisting optometrists to make clinical decisions with speed and accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10579063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | 四川大学学报(医学版)编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105790632023-10-18 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 大数据与人工智能技术在生物医学多场景的应用 OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of applying deep learning (DL) algorithm in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out, covering 600 corneal fluorescein staining photos acquired in the Contact Lens Clinic, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2020 and 2022. Out of the 600 photos, 500 were used to construct the algorithm and the remaining 100 were used for the validation of the algorithm and a comparative analysis of the difference in grading accuracy (ACC) and the length of diagnostic time between artificial intelligence (AI) and optometry students. One month after finishing the first grading analysis, assessment by AI and optometry students was conducted for a second time and results from the two rounds of assessment were compared to examine the intrarater agreement (kappa value) of the two analyses. The grading analysis results of 3 experienced optometrists were used as the gold standard in the study. RESULTS: Findings of the cross validation with the complete dataset, the training dataset, and the test dataset showed that ResNet34 had the highest predictive accuracy among four DL models. ResNet34 DL model achieved an accuracy of 93.0%, sensitivity of 89.5%, and specificity of 89.6% in the grading of corneal staining. In the comparison of the grading accuracy of AI and two optometry students, AI showed better accuracy, with the respective grading accuracy being 87.0%, 78.0%, and 52.0% for AI, student 1, and student 2 (P(ACC)=0.001). In addition, the average diagnostic time of AI was shorter than that of optometry students (t(AI)=1.00 s, t(S1)=11.86 s, t(S2)=13.25 s, P(t)=0.001). In the comparative analysis of the intrarater agreement between the two assessments, AI (kappa(AI)=0.658, P(AI)=0.001) achieved better consistency than the two optometry students did (kappa(S1)=0.575, P(S1)=0.001; kappa(S2)=0.609, P(S2)=0.001). CONCLUSION: Applying deep learning algorithms in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining has considerable feasibility and clinical value. In the performance comparison between AI and optometry students, AI achieved higher accuracy and better consistency, which indicates that AI has potential application value for assisting optometrists to make clinical decisions with speed and accuracy. 四川大学学报(医学版)编辑部 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10579063/ /pubmed/37866945 http://dx.doi.org/10.12182/20230960104 Text en © 2023《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0). In other words, the full-text content of the journal is made freely available for third-party users to copy and redistribute in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the content of the journal. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not use the content of the journal for commercial purposes. For more information about the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 大数据与人工智能技术在生物医学多场景的应用 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title_full | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title_fullStr | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title_full_unstemmed | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title_short | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
title_sort | 深度学习算法在角膜荧光染色分级评估中的应用 |
topic | 大数据与人工智能技术在生物医学多场景的应用 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37866945 http://dx.doi.org/10.12182/20230960104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shēndùxuéxísuànfǎzàijiǎomóyíngguāngrǎnsèfēnjípínggūzhōngdeyīngyòng AT shēndùxuéxísuànfǎzàijiǎomóyíngguāngrǎnsèfēnjípínggūzhōngdeyīngyòng AT shēndùxuéxísuànfǎzàijiǎomóyíngguāngrǎnsèfēnjípínggūzhōngdeyīngyòng AT shēndùxuéxísuànfǎzàijiǎomóyíngguāngrǎnsèfēnjípínggūzhōngdeyīngyòng |