Cargando…
ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise in capturing primary resistance to immunotherapy. BR.36 is a multi-center, randomized, ctDNA-directed, phase 2 trial of molecular response-adaptive immuno-chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer. In the first of two independent stages, 50 patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02598-9 |
_version_ | 1785121650293866496 |
---|---|
author | Anagnostou, Valsamo Ho, Cheryl Nicholas, Garth Juergens, Rosalyn Anne Sacher, Adrian Fung, Andrea S. Wheatley-Price, Paul Laurie, Scott A. Levy, Benjamin Brahmer, Julie R. Balan, Archana Niknafs, Noushin Avrutin, Egor Zhu, Liting Sausen, Mark Bradbury, Penelope A. O’Donnell-Tormey, Jill Gaudreau, Pierre Olivier Ding, Keyue Dancey, Janet |
author_facet | Anagnostou, Valsamo Ho, Cheryl Nicholas, Garth Juergens, Rosalyn Anne Sacher, Adrian Fung, Andrea S. Wheatley-Price, Paul Laurie, Scott A. Levy, Benjamin Brahmer, Julie R. Balan, Archana Niknafs, Noushin Avrutin, Egor Zhu, Liting Sausen, Mark Bradbury, Penelope A. O’Donnell-Tormey, Jill Gaudreau, Pierre Olivier Ding, Keyue Dancey, Janet |
author_sort | Anagnostou, Valsamo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise in capturing primary resistance to immunotherapy. BR.36 is a multi-center, randomized, ctDNA-directed, phase 2 trial of molecular response-adaptive immuno-chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer. In the first of two independent stages, 50 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer received pembrolizumab as standard of care. The primary objectives of stage 1 were to ascertain ctDNA response and determine optimal timing and concordance with radiologic Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of time to ctDNA response and correlation with progression-free and overall survival. Maximal mutant allele fraction clearance at the third cycle of pembrolizumab signified molecular response (mR). The trial met its primary endpoint, with a sensitivity of ctDNA response for RECIST response of 82% (90% confidence interval (CI): 52–97%) and a specificity of 75% (90% CI: 56.5–88.5%). Median time to ctDNA response was 2.1 months (90% CI: 1.5–2.6), and patients with mR attained longer progression-free survival (5.03 months versus 2.6 months) and overall survival (not reached versus 7.23 months). These findings are incorporated into the ctDNA-driven interventional molecular response-adaptive second stage of the BR.36 trial in which patients at risk of progression are randomized to treatment intensification or continuation of therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04093167. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10579094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105790942023-10-18 ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results Anagnostou, Valsamo Ho, Cheryl Nicholas, Garth Juergens, Rosalyn Anne Sacher, Adrian Fung, Andrea S. Wheatley-Price, Paul Laurie, Scott A. Levy, Benjamin Brahmer, Julie R. Balan, Archana Niknafs, Noushin Avrutin, Egor Zhu, Liting Sausen, Mark Bradbury, Penelope A. O’Donnell-Tormey, Jill Gaudreau, Pierre Olivier Ding, Keyue Dancey, Janet Nat Med Article Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise in capturing primary resistance to immunotherapy. BR.36 is a multi-center, randomized, ctDNA-directed, phase 2 trial of molecular response-adaptive immuno-chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer. In the first of two independent stages, 50 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer received pembrolizumab as standard of care. The primary objectives of stage 1 were to ascertain ctDNA response and determine optimal timing and concordance with radiologic Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of time to ctDNA response and correlation with progression-free and overall survival. Maximal mutant allele fraction clearance at the third cycle of pembrolizumab signified molecular response (mR). The trial met its primary endpoint, with a sensitivity of ctDNA response for RECIST response of 82% (90% confidence interval (CI): 52–97%) and a specificity of 75% (90% CI: 56.5–88.5%). Median time to ctDNA response was 2.1 months (90% CI: 1.5–2.6), and patients with mR attained longer progression-free survival (5.03 months versus 2.6 months) and overall survival (not reached versus 7.23 months). These findings are incorporated into the ctDNA-driven interventional molecular response-adaptive second stage of the BR.36 trial in which patients at risk of progression are randomized to treatment intensification or continuation of therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04093167. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-10-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10579094/ /pubmed/37814061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02598-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Anagnostou, Valsamo Ho, Cheryl Nicholas, Garth Juergens, Rosalyn Anne Sacher, Adrian Fung, Andrea S. Wheatley-Price, Paul Laurie, Scott A. Levy, Benjamin Brahmer, Julie R. Balan, Archana Niknafs, Noushin Avrutin, Egor Zhu, Liting Sausen, Mark Bradbury, Penelope A. O’Donnell-Tormey, Jill Gaudreau, Pierre Olivier Ding, Keyue Dancey, Janet ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title | ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title_full | ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title_fullStr | ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title_full_unstemmed | ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title_short | ctDNA response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
title_sort | ctdna response after pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 adaptive trial results |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02598-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anagnostouvalsamo ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT hocheryl ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT nicholasgarth ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT juergensrosalynanne ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT sacheradrian ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT fungandreas ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT wheatleypricepaul ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT lauriescotta ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT levybenjamin ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT brahmerjulier ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT balanarchana ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT niknafsnoushin ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT avrutinegor ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT zhuliting ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT sausenmark ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT bradburypenelopea ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT odonnelltormeyjill ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT gaudreaupierreolivier ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT dingkeyue ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults AT danceyjanet ctdnaresponseafterpembrolizumabinnonsmallcelllungcancerphase2adaptivetrialresults |