Cargando…

Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes

The rise of nanofiltration technologies holds great promise for creating more effective and affordable techniques aiming to remove undesirable pollutants from wastewaters. Despite nanofiltration’s promising potential in removing antineoplastic drugs from liquid matrices, the limited information on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouveia, Teresa I.A., Alves, Arminda, Santos, Mónica S.F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w
_version_ 1785121656026431488
author Gouveia, Teresa I.A.
Alves, Arminda
Santos, Mónica S.F.
author_facet Gouveia, Teresa I.A.
Alves, Arminda
Santos, Mónica S.F.
author_sort Gouveia, Teresa I.A.
collection PubMed
description The rise of nanofiltration technologies holds great promise for creating more effective and affordable techniques aiming to remove undesirable pollutants from wastewaters. Despite nanofiltration’s promising potential in removing antineoplastic drugs from liquid matrices, the limited information on this topic makes it important to estimate the rejection rates for a larger number of compounds, particularly the emerging ones, in order to preview the nanofiltration performance. Aiming to have preliminary estimations of the rejection rates of antineoplastic drugs by nanofiltration, 54 antineoplastic drugs were studied in 5 nanofiltration membranes (Desal 5DK, Desal HL, Trisep TS-80, NF270, and NF50), using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. While this methodology provides useful and reliable predictions of the rejections of compounds by nanofiltration, particularly for hydrophilic and neutral compounds, it is important to note that QSAR results should always be corroborated by experimental assays, as predictions were confirmed to have their limitations (especially for hydrophobic and charged compounds). Out of the 54 studied antineoplastic drugs, 29 were predicted to have a rejection that could go up to 100%, independent of the membrane used. Nonetheless, there were 2 antineoplastic drugs, fluorouracil and thiotepa, for which negligible removals were obtained (<21%). This study’s findings may contribute (i) to the selection of the most appropriate nanofiltration membranes for removing antineoplastic drugs from wastewaters and (ii) to assist in the design of effective treatment approaches for their removal. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105791182023-10-18 Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes Gouveia, Teresa I.A. Alves, Arminda Santos, Mónica S.F. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article The rise of nanofiltration technologies holds great promise for creating more effective and affordable techniques aiming to remove undesirable pollutants from wastewaters. Despite nanofiltration’s promising potential in removing antineoplastic drugs from liquid matrices, the limited information on this topic makes it important to estimate the rejection rates for a larger number of compounds, particularly the emerging ones, in order to preview the nanofiltration performance. Aiming to have preliminary estimations of the rejection rates of antineoplastic drugs by nanofiltration, 54 antineoplastic drugs were studied in 5 nanofiltration membranes (Desal 5DK, Desal HL, Trisep TS-80, NF270, and NF50), using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. While this methodology provides useful and reliable predictions of the rejections of compounds by nanofiltration, particularly for hydrophilic and neutral compounds, it is important to note that QSAR results should always be corroborated by experimental assays, as predictions were confirmed to have their limitations (especially for hydrophobic and charged compounds). Out of the 54 studied antineoplastic drugs, 29 were predicted to have a rejection that could go up to 100%, independent of the membrane used. Nonetheless, there were 2 antineoplastic drugs, fluorouracil and thiotepa, for which negligible removals were obtained (<21%). This study’s findings may contribute (i) to the selection of the most appropriate nanofiltration membranes for removing antineoplastic drugs from wastewaters and (ii) to assist in the design of effective treatment approaches for their removal. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10579118/ /pubmed/37723401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Gouveia, Teresa I.A.
Alves, Arminda
Santos, Mónica S.F.
Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title_full Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title_fullStr Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title_short Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
title_sort theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gouveiateresaia theoreticalrejectionoffiftyfourantineoplasticdrugsbydifferentnanofiltrationmembranes
AT alvesarminda theoreticalrejectionoffiftyfourantineoplasticdrugsbydifferentnanofiltrationmembranes
AT santosmonicasf theoreticalrejectionoffiftyfourantineoplasticdrugsbydifferentnanofiltrationmembranes