Cargando…

Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications

INTRODUCTION: Promptly providing new drugs to fulfill unmet medical needs requires changes in drug development and registration processes. Health Authorities (HAs) considered as reference due to their experience and acknowledgement (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] among others) already consider i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Argotti, Urimara, Leyens, Lada, Lisbona, Carlos, López, Pilar, Alonso-Orgaz, Sergio, Nevado, Angel, Cozzi, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00565-7
_version_ 1785121663995609088
author Argotti, Urimara
Leyens, Lada
Lisbona, Carlos
López, Pilar
Alonso-Orgaz, Sergio
Nevado, Angel
Cozzi, Virginia
author_facet Argotti, Urimara
Leyens, Lada
Lisbona, Carlos
López, Pilar
Alonso-Orgaz, Sergio
Nevado, Angel
Cozzi, Virginia
author_sort Argotti, Urimara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Promptly providing new drugs to fulfill unmet medical needs requires changes in drug development and registration processes. Health Authorities (HAs) considered as reference due to their experience and acknowledgement (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] among others) already consider innovative clinical trial (CT) designs and flexible approval procedures, but Latin America (LATAM) regulations are still far. A comparison was performed to identify gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT requirements for drug Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) and CT approval regulations were compared between LATAM and reference HAs (FDA/European Medicines Agency [EMA]/Health-Canada/Swissmedic/Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA]/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), as of August 2022. Procedure included reference HAs regulations review, item selection, identification in LATAM regulations, and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines (ICH-E6[R2]/ICH-E8[R1]) implementation revision. RESULTS: For MAA, specific application requirements or ICH guideline M4(R4) on common technical document (CTD) adoption are generally stated, and phase-I/III performance is mandatory (explicitly/implicitly). Faster patient access procedures are infrequent: Priority-drug programs, conditional authorizations, or expedited procedures are scarce or non-existent. Regulatory reliance procedures are adopted through different pathways. Regarding CT approval, innovative/complex CT designs are not prohibited but usually omitted. Some countries implemented adapted CT conducting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early scientific advice meetings (HA-sponsor) are occasionally considered. Most countries are not formally ICH-joined. CONCLUSIONS: LATAM regulations must adapt to new regulatory standards (FDA/EMA/ICH) through implementation of frequent updates, reliance/expedited procedures, early HA-sponsor interactions, innovative/complex CTs, mandatory phase-III reaching elimination, and decentralized elements for CT conducting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105791562023-10-18 Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications Argotti, Urimara Leyens, Lada Lisbona, Carlos López, Pilar Alonso-Orgaz, Sergio Nevado, Angel Cozzi, Virginia Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research INTRODUCTION: Promptly providing new drugs to fulfill unmet medical needs requires changes in drug development and registration processes. Health Authorities (HAs) considered as reference due to their experience and acknowledgement (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] among others) already consider innovative clinical trial (CT) designs and flexible approval procedures, but Latin America (LATAM) regulations are still far. A comparison was performed to identify gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT requirements for drug Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) and CT approval regulations were compared between LATAM and reference HAs (FDA/European Medicines Agency [EMA]/Health-Canada/Swissmedic/Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA]/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), as of August 2022. Procedure included reference HAs regulations review, item selection, identification in LATAM regulations, and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines (ICH-E6[R2]/ICH-E8[R1]) implementation revision. RESULTS: For MAA, specific application requirements or ICH guideline M4(R4) on common technical document (CTD) adoption are generally stated, and phase-I/III performance is mandatory (explicitly/implicitly). Faster patient access procedures are infrequent: Priority-drug programs, conditional authorizations, or expedited procedures are scarce or non-existent. Regulatory reliance procedures are adopted through different pathways. Regarding CT approval, innovative/complex CT designs are not prohibited but usually omitted. Some countries implemented adapted CT conducting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early scientific advice meetings (HA-sponsor) are occasionally considered. Most countries are not formally ICH-joined. CONCLUSIONS: LATAM regulations must adapt to new regulatory standards (FDA/EMA/ICH) through implementation of frequent updates, reliance/expedited procedures, early HA-sponsor interactions, innovative/complex CTs, mandatory phase-III reaching elimination, and decentralized elements for CT conducting. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10579156/ /pubmed/37682461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00565-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Argotti, Urimara
Leyens, Lada
Lisbona, Carlos
López, Pilar
Alonso-Orgaz, Sergio
Nevado, Angel
Cozzi, Virginia
Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title_full Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title_fullStr Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title_short Comparison of the Latin America Regulation Landscape and International Reference Health Authorities to Hasten Drug Registration and Clinical Research Applications
title_sort comparison of the latin america regulation landscape and international reference health authorities to hasten drug registration and clinical research applications
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00565-7
work_keys_str_mv AT argottiurimara comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT leyenslada comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT lisbonacarlos comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT lopezpilar comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT alonsoorgazsergio comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT nevadoangel comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications
AT cozzivirginia comparisonofthelatinamericaregulationlandscapeandinternationalreferencehealthauthoritiestohastendrugregistrationandclinicalresearchapplications