Cargando…

Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics

Urine is ideal for non-targeted metabolomics, providing valuable insights into normal and pathological cellular processes. Optimal extraction is critical since non-targeted metabolomics aims to analyse various compound classes. Here, we optimised a low-volume urine preparation procedure for non-targ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivier, Cara, Allen, Bianca, Luies, Laneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44690-7
_version_ 1785121677411090432
author Olivier, Cara
Allen, Bianca
Luies, Laneke
author_facet Olivier, Cara
Allen, Bianca
Luies, Laneke
author_sort Olivier, Cara
collection PubMed
description Urine is ideal for non-targeted metabolomics, providing valuable insights into normal and pathological cellular processes. Optimal extraction is critical since non-targeted metabolomics aims to analyse various compound classes. Here, we optimised a low-volume urine preparation procedure for non-targeted GC–MS. Five extraction methods (four organic acid [OA] extraction variations and a “direct analysis” [DA] approach) were assessed based on repeatability, metabolome coverage, and metabolite recovery. The DA method exhibited superior repeatability, and achieved the highest metabolome coverage, detecting 91 unique metabolites from multiple compound classes comparatively. Conversely, OA methods may not be suitable for all non-targeted metabolomics applications due to their bias toward a specific compound class. In accordance, the OA methods demonstrated limitations, with lower compound recovery and a higher percentage of undetected compounds. The DA method was further improved by incorporating an additional drying step between two-step derivatization but did not benefit from urease sample pre-treatment. Overall, this study establishes an improved low-volume urine preparation approach for future non-targeted urine metabolomics applications using GC–MS. Our findings contribute to advancing the field of metabolomics and enable efficient, comprehensive analysis of urinary metabolites, which could facilitate more accurate disease diagnosis or biomarker discovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105792162023-10-18 Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics Olivier, Cara Allen, Bianca Luies, Laneke Sci Rep Article Urine is ideal for non-targeted metabolomics, providing valuable insights into normal and pathological cellular processes. Optimal extraction is critical since non-targeted metabolomics aims to analyse various compound classes. Here, we optimised a low-volume urine preparation procedure for non-targeted GC–MS. Five extraction methods (four organic acid [OA] extraction variations and a “direct analysis” [DA] approach) were assessed based on repeatability, metabolome coverage, and metabolite recovery. The DA method exhibited superior repeatability, and achieved the highest metabolome coverage, detecting 91 unique metabolites from multiple compound classes comparatively. Conversely, OA methods may not be suitable for all non-targeted metabolomics applications due to their bias toward a specific compound class. In accordance, the OA methods demonstrated limitations, with lower compound recovery and a higher percentage of undetected compounds. The DA method was further improved by incorporating an additional drying step between two-step derivatization but did not benefit from urease sample pre-treatment. Overall, this study establishes an improved low-volume urine preparation approach for future non-targeted urine metabolomics applications using GC–MS. Our findings contribute to advancing the field of metabolomics and enable efficient, comprehensive analysis of urinary metabolites, which could facilitate more accurate disease diagnosis or biomarker discovery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10579216/ /pubmed/37845360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44690-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Olivier, Cara
Allen, Bianca
Luies, Laneke
Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title_full Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title_fullStr Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title_full_unstemmed Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title_short Optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted GC–MS metabolomics
title_sort optimising a urinary extraction method for non-targeted gc–ms metabolomics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44690-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oliviercara optimisingaurinaryextractionmethodfornontargetedgcmsmetabolomics
AT allenbianca optimisingaurinaryextractionmethodfornontargetedgcmsmetabolomics
AT luieslaneke optimisingaurinaryextractionmethodfornontargetedgcmsmetabolomics