Cargando…
A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory
Episodic memory is memory for experiences within a specific temporal and spatial context. Episodic memories decline early in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Recollection of episodic memories can fail with both AD and aging, but familiarity and recollection memory uniquely fail in AD. Finding a means to di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44804-1 |
_version_ | 1785121680014704640 |
---|---|
author | Neiworth, Julie J. Thall, Madeline E. Liu, Shannon Leon-Moffly, Ellie Rankin, Moira LoRusso, Madeline A. Thandi, Suhani Garay-Hernandez, John |
author_facet | Neiworth, Julie J. Thall, Madeline E. Liu, Shannon Leon-Moffly, Ellie Rankin, Moira LoRusso, Madeline A. Thandi, Suhani Garay-Hernandez, John |
author_sort | Neiworth, Julie J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Episodic memory is memory for experiences within a specific temporal and spatial context. Episodic memories decline early in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Recollection of episodic memories can fail with both AD and aging, but familiarity and recollection memory uniquely fail in AD. Finding a means to differentiate specific memory failures in animal models is critical for translational research. Four cotton top tamarins participated in an object recognition test. They were exposed to two unique objects placed in a consistent context for 5 daily sessions. Next a delay of 1 day or 1 week was imposed. Subjects’ memory of the objects was tested by replacing one of the familiarized objects with a novel one. The tamarins looked longer at the novel object after both delays, an indication of remembering the familiar object. In other tests, the test pair was relocated to a new location or presented at a different time of day. With context changes, tamarins showed greater interest in the novel object after a 1-week delay but not after a 1-day delay. It seems that context changes disrupted their recollection of recent events. But the monkeys showed accurate familiarity memory across context changes with longer delays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10579227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105792272023-10-18 A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory Neiworth, Julie J. Thall, Madeline E. Liu, Shannon Leon-Moffly, Ellie Rankin, Moira LoRusso, Madeline A. Thandi, Suhani Garay-Hernandez, John Sci Rep Article Episodic memory is memory for experiences within a specific temporal and spatial context. Episodic memories decline early in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Recollection of episodic memories can fail with both AD and aging, but familiarity and recollection memory uniquely fail in AD. Finding a means to differentiate specific memory failures in animal models is critical for translational research. Four cotton top tamarins participated in an object recognition test. They were exposed to two unique objects placed in a consistent context for 5 daily sessions. Next a delay of 1 day or 1 week was imposed. Subjects’ memory of the objects was tested by replacing one of the familiarized objects with a novel one. The tamarins looked longer at the novel object after both delays, an indication of remembering the familiar object. In other tests, the test pair was relocated to a new location or presented at a different time of day. With context changes, tamarins showed greater interest in the novel object after a 1-week delay but not after a 1-day delay. It seems that context changes disrupted their recollection of recent events. But the monkeys showed accurate familiarity memory across context changes with longer delays. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10579227/ /pubmed/37845334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44804-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Neiworth, Julie J. Thall, Madeline E. Liu, Shannon Leon-Moffly, Ellie Rankin, Moira LoRusso, Madeline A. Thandi, Suhani Garay-Hernandez, John A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title | A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title_full | A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title_fullStr | A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title_full_unstemmed | A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title_short | A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
title_sort | recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44804-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neiworthjuliej arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT thallmadelinee arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT liushannon arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT leonmofflyellie arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT rankinmoira arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT lorussomadelinea arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT thandisuhani arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT garayhernandezjohn arecognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT neiworthjuliej recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT thallmadelinee recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT liushannon recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT leonmofflyellie recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT rankinmoira recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT lorussomadelinea recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT thandisuhani recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory AT garayhernandezjohn recognitiontestinmonkeystodifferentiaterecollectionfromfamiliaritymemory |