Cargando…

Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study

To investigate clinical data and computed tomographic (CT) imaging features in differentiating gastric schwannomas (GSs) from gastric stromal tumours (GISTs) in matched patients, 31 patients with GSs were matched with 62 patients with GISTs (1:2) in sex, age, and tumour site. The clinical and imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lijia, Wang, Qi, Yang, Li, Ma, Chongfei, Shi, Gaofeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43902-4
_version_ 1785121705309503488
author Wang, Lijia
Wang, Qi
Yang, Li
Ma, Chongfei
Shi, Gaofeng
author_facet Wang, Lijia
Wang, Qi
Yang, Li
Ma, Chongfei
Shi, Gaofeng
author_sort Wang, Lijia
collection PubMed
description To investigate clinical data and computed tomographic (CT) imaging features in differentiating gastric schwannomas (GSs) from gastric stromal tumours (GISTs) in matched patients, 31 patients with GSs were matched with 62 patients with GISTs (1:2) in sex, age, and tumour site. The clinical and imaging data were analysed. A significant (P < 0.05) difference was found in the tumour margin, enhancement pattern, growth pattern, and LD values between the 31 patients with GSs and 62 matched patients with GISTs. The GS lesions were mostly (93.5%) well defined while only 61.3% GIST lesions were well defined.The GS lesions were significantly (P = 0.036) smaller than the GIST lesions, with the LD ranging 1.5–7.4 (mean 3.67 cm) cm for the GSs and 1.0–15.30 (mean 5.09) cm for GIST lesions. The GS lesions were more significantly (P = 0.001) homogeneously enhanced (83.9% vs. 41.9%) than the GIST lesions. The GS lesions were mainly of the mixed growth pattern both within and outside the gastric wall (74.2% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.05) compared with that of GISTs. No metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs was present in any of the GS lesions, however, 1.6% of GISTs experienced metastasis and 3.2% of GISTs presented with invasion of adjacent organs. Heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern were two significant (P < 0.05) independent factors for distinguishing GS from GIST lesions. In conclusion: GS and GIST lesions may have significantly different features for differentiation in lesion margin, heterogeneous enhancement, mixed growth pattern, and longest lesion diameter, especially heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105793442023-10-18 Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study Wang, Lijia Wang, Qi Yang, Li Ma, Chongfei Shi, Gaofeng Sci Rep Article To investigate clinical data and computed tomographic (CT) imaging features in differentiating gastric schwannomas (GSs) from gastric stromal tumours (GISTs) in matched patients, 31 patients with GSs were matched with 62 patients with GISTs (1:2) in sex, age, and tumour site. The clinical and imaging data were analysed. A significant (P < 0.05) difference was found in the tumour margin, enhancement pattern, growth pattern, and LD values between the 31 patients with GSs and 62 matched patients with GISTs. The GS lesions were mostly (93.5%) well defined while only 61.3% GIST lesions were well defined.The GS lesions were significantly (P = 0.036) smaller than the GIST lesions, with the LD ranging 1.5–7.4 (mean 3.67 cm) cm for the GSs and 1.0–15.30 (mean 5.09) cm for GIST lesions. The GS lesions were more significantly (P = 0.001) homogeneously enhanced (83.9% vs. 41.9%) than the GIST lesions. The GS lesions were mainly of the mixed growth pattern both within and outside the gastric wall (74.2% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.05) compared with that of GISTs. No metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs was present in any of the GS lesions, however, 1.6% of GISTs experienced metastasis and 3.2% of GISTs presented with invasion of adjacent organs. Heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern were two significant (P < 0.05) independent factors for distinguishing GS from GIST lesions. In conclusion: GS and GIST lesions may have significantly different features for differentiation in lesion margin, heterogeneous enhancement, mixed growth pattern, and longest lesion diameter, especially heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10579344/ /pubmed/37845257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43902-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Lijia
Wang, Qi
Yang, Li
Ma, Chongfei
Shi, Gaofeng
Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title_full Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title_fullStr Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title_short Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
title_sort computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case–control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43902-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglijia computedtomographicimagingfeaturestodifferentiategastricschwannomasfromgastrointestinalstromaltumoursamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT wangqi computedtomographicimagingfeaturestodifferentiategastricschwannomasfromgastrointestinalstromaltumoursamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT yangli computedtomographicimagingfeaturestodifferentiategastricschwannomasfromgastrointestinalstromaltumoursamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT machongfei computedtomographicimagingfeaturestodifferentiategastricschwannomasfromgastrointestinalstromaltumoursamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT shigaofeng computedtomographicimagingfeaturestodifferentiategastricschwannomasfromgastrointestinalstromaltumoursamatchedcasecontrolstudy