Cargando…

Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)

PURPOSE: To provide straightforward instructions for daily practice in delineating emerging organs-at-risk (OARs) of the female pelvis and to discuss the interobserver variability in a two-step multicenter study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries for each emerging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Augurio, A., Macchia, G., Caravatta, L., Lucarelli, M., Di Gugliemo, F., Vinciguerra, A., Seccia, B., De Sanctis, V., Autorino, R., Delle Curti, C., Meregalli, S., Perrucci, E., Raspanti, D., Cerrotta, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100688
_version_ 1785121844603387904
author Augurio, A.
Macchia, G.
Caravatta, L.
Lucarelli, M.
Di Gugliemo, F.
Vinciguerra, A.
Seccia, B.
De Sanctis, V.
Autorino, R.
Delle Curti, C.
Meregalli, S.
Perrucci, E.
Raspanti, D.
Cerrotta, A.
author_facet Augurio, A.
Macchia, G.
Caravatta, L.
Lucarelli, M.
Di Gugliemo, F.
Vinciguerra, A.
Seccia, B.
De Sanctis, V.
Autorino, R.
Delle Curti, C.
Meregalli, S.
Perrucci, E.
Raspanti, D.
Cerrotta, A.
author_sort Augurio, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To provide straightforward instructions for daily practice in delineating emerging organs-at-risk (OARs) of the female pelvis and to discuss the interobserver variability in a two-step multicenter study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries for each emerging OAR was realized by radiation oncologists and radiologists who are experts in pelvic imaging, as per their knowledge and clinical practice. These contours were identified as quality benchmarks for the analysis subsequently carried out. Radiation oncologists not involved in setting the custom-built contouring atlas and interested in the treatment of gynecological cancer were invited to participate in this 2-step trial. In the first step all participants were supplied with a selected clinical case of locally advanced cervical cancer and had to identify emerging OARs (Levator ani muscle; Puborectalis muscle; Internal anal sphincter; External anal sphincter; Bladder base and trigone; Bladder neck; Iliac Bone Marrow; Lower Pelvis Bone Marrow; Lumbosacral Bone Marrow) based on their own personal knowledge of pelvic anatomy and experience. The suggested OARs and the contouring process were then presented at a subsequent webinar meeting with a contouring laboratory. Finally, in the second step, after the webinar meeting, each participant who had joined the study but was not involved in setting the benchmark received the custom-built contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries and was requested to delineate again the OARs using the tool provided. The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) were used to evaluate the spatial overlap accuracy of the different volume delineations and compared with the benchmark; the Hausdorff distance (HD) and the mean distance to agreement (MDA) to explore the distance between contours. All the results were reported as sample mean and standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Fifteen radiation oncologists from different Institutions joined the study. The participants had a high agreement degree for pelvic bones sub-structures delineation according to DICE (IBM: 0.9 ± 0.02; LPBM: 0.91 ± 0.01). A moderate degree according to DICE was showed for ovaries (Right: 0.61 ± 0.16, Left: 0.72 ± 0.05), vagina (0.575 ± 0.13), bladder sub-structures (0.515 ± 0.08) and EAS (0.605 ± 0.05), whereas a low degree for the other sub-structures of the anal-rectal sphincter complex (LAM: 0.345 ± 0.07, PRM: 0.41 ± 0.10, and IAS: 0.4 ± 0.07). CONCLUSION: This study found a moderate to low level of agreement in the delineation of the female pelvis emerging OARs, with a high degree of variability among observers. The development of delineation tools should be encouraged to improve the routine contouring of these OARs and increase the quality and consistency of radiotherapy planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105799542023-10-18 Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO) Augurio, A. Macchia, G. Caravatta, L. Lucarelli, M. Di Gugliemo, F. Vinciguerra, A. Seccia, B. De Sanctis, V. Autorino, R. Delle Curti, C. Meregalli, S. Perrucci, E. Raspanti, D. Cerrotta, A. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article PURPOSE: To provide straightforward instructions for daily practice in delineating emerging organs-at-risk (OARs) of the female pelvis and to discuss the interobserver variability in a two-step multicenter study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries for each emerging OAR was realized by radiation oncologists and radiologists who are experts in pelvic imaging, as per their knowledge and clinical practice. These contours were identified as quality benchmarks for the analysis subsequently carried out. Radiation oncologists not involved in setting the custom-built contouring atlas and interested in the treatment of gynecological cancer were invited to participate in this 2-step trial. In the first step all participants were supplied with a selected clinical case of locally advanced cervical cancer and had to identify emerging OARs (Levator ani muscle; Puborectalis muscle; Internal anal sphincter; External anal sphincter; Bladder base and trigone; Bladder neck; Iliac Bone Marrow; Lower Pelvis Bone Marrow; Lumbosacral Bone Marrow) based on their own personal knowledge of pelvic anatomy and experience. The suggested OARs and the contouring process were then presented at a subsequent webinar meeting with a contouring laboratory. Finally, in the second step, after the webinar meeting, each participant who had joined the study but was not involved in setting the benchmark received the custom-built contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries and was requested to delineate again the OARs using the tool provided. The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) were used to evaluate the spatial overlap accuracy of the different volume delineations and compared with the benchmark; the Hausdorff distance (HD) and the mean distance to agreement (MDA) to explore the distance between contours. All the results were reported as sample mean and standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Fifteen radiation oncologists from different Institutions joined the study. The participants had a high agreement degree for pelvic bones sub-structures delineation according to DICE (IBM: 0.9 ± 0.02; LPBM: 0.91 ± 0.01). A moderate degree according to DICE was showed for ovaries (Right: 0.61 ± 0.16, Left: 0.72 ± 0.05), vagina (0.575 ± 0.13), bladder sub-structures (0.515 ± 0.08) and EAS (0.605 ± 0.05), whereas a low degree for the other sub-structures of the anal-rectal sphincter complex (LAM: 0.345 ± 0.07, PRM: 0.41 ± 0.10, and IAS: 0.4 ± 0.07). CONCLUSION: This study found a moderate to low level of agreement in the delineation of the female pelvis emerging OARs, with a high degree of variability among observers. The development of delineation tools should be encouraged to improve the routine contouring of these OARs and increase the quality and consistency of radiotherapy planning. Elsevier 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10579954/ /pubmed/37854671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100688 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Augurio, A.
Macchia, G.
Caravatta, L.
Lucarelli, M.
Di Gugliemo, F.
Vinciguerra, A.
Seccia, B.
De Sanctis, V.
Autorino, R.
Delle Curti, C.
Meregalli, S.
Perrucci, E.
Raspanti, D.
Cerrotta, A.
Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title_full Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title_fullStr Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title_full_unstemmed Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title_short Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)
title_sort contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (oars) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: a study by the italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (airo)
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100688
work_keys_str_mv AT augurioa contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT macchiag contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT caravattal contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT lucarellim contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT digugliemof contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT vinciguerraa contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT secciab contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT desanctisv contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT autorinor contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT dellecurtic contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT meregallis contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT perruccie contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT raspantid contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo
AT cerrottaa contouringofemergingorgansatriskoarsofthefemalepelvisandinterobservervariabilityastudybytheitalianassociationofradiotherapyandclinicaloncologyairo