Cargando…

Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer

The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuwayama, Naoki, Hoshino, Isamu, Mori, Yasukuni, Yokota, Hajime, Iwatate, Yosuke, Uno, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087
_version_ 1785121852040937472
author Kuwayama, Naoki
Hoshino, Isamu
Mori, Yasukuni
Yokota, Hajime
Iwatate, Yosuke
Uno, Takashi
author_facet Kuwayama, Naoki
Hoshino, Isamu
Mori, Yasukuni
Yokota, Hajime
Iwatate, Yosuke
Uno, Takashi
author_sort Kuwayama, Naoki
collection PubMed
description The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Experiments were conducted using four machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and deep neural network (DNN), to classify good or poor post-5-year prognosis based on clinicopathological data and post-5-year relapse occurrence. For each machine learning method, the importance was sorted in descending order (from the most to the least); the top features were used for clustering using the k-medoids method. The prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year survival were as follows: LR, 76.8% and 0.702; RF, 72.5% and 0.721; GB, 75.3% and 0.73; DNN, 76.9% and 0.682, respectively. The prediction accuracy and AUC for 5-year recurrence-free survival were as follows: LR, 85.5% and 0.692; RF, 79.0% and 0.721; GB, 80.5% and 0.718; DNN, 83.2% and 0.670. Clustering patients into three groups resulted in a stratification distinct from the TNM classification. In conclusion, AI machine learning using routine clinical data can help evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer, with prognosis differing according to AI-identified clusters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10579989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105799892023-10-18 Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer Kuwayama, Naoki Hoshino, Isamu Mori, Yasukuni Yokota, Hajime Iwatate, Yosuke Uno, Takashi Oncol Lett Articles The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Experiments were conducted using four machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and deep neural network (DNN), to classify good or poor post-5-year prognosis based on clinicopathological data and post-5-year relapse occurrence. For each machine learning method, the importance was sorted in descending order (from the most to the least); the top features were used for clustering using the k-medoids method. The prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year survival were as follows: LR, 76.8% and 0.702; RF, 72.5% and 0.721; GB, 75.3% and 0.73; DNN, 76.9% and 0.682, respectively. The prediction accuracy and AUC for 5-year recurrence-free survival were as follows: LR, 85.5% and 0.692; RF, 79.0% and 0.721; GB, 80.5% and 0.718; DNN, 83.2% and 0.670. Clustering patients into three groups resulted in a stratification distinct from the TNM classification. In conclusion, AI machine learning using routine clinical data can help evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer, with prognosis differing according to AI-identified clusters. D.A. Spandidos 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10579989/ /pubmed/37854867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087 Text en Copyright: © Kuwayama et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Kuwayama, Naoki
Hoshino, Isamu
Mori, Yasukuni
Yokota, Hajime
Iwatate, Yosuke
Uno, Takashi
Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title_full Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title_fullStr Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title_short Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
title_sort applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087
work_keys_str_mv AT kuwayamanaoki applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer
AT hoshinoisamu applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer
AT moriyasukuni applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer
AT yokotahajime applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer
AT iwatateyosuke applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer
AT unotakashi applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer