Cargando…
Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer
The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classific...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087 |
_version_ | 1785121852040937472 |
---|---|
author | Kuwayama, Naoki Hoshino, Isamu Mori, Yasukuni Yokota, Hajime Iwatate, Yosuke Uno, Takashi |
author_facet | Kuwayama, Naoki Hoshino, Isamu Mori, Yasukuni Yokota, Hajime Iwatate, Yosuke Uno, Takashi |
author_sort | Kuwayama, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Experiments were conducted using four machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and deep neural network (DNN), to classify good or poor post-5-year prognosis based on clinicopathological data and post-5-year relapse occurrence. For each machine learning method, the importance was sorted in descending order (from the most to the least); the top features were used for clustering using the k-medoids method. The prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year survival were as follows: LR, 76.8% and 0.702; RF, 72.5% and 0.721; GB, 75.3% and 0.73; DNN, 76.9% and 0.682, respectively. The prediction accuracy and AUC for 5-year recurrence-free survival were as follows: LR, 85.5% and 0.692; RF, 79.0% and 0.721; GB, 80.5% and 0.718; DNN, 83.2% and 0.670. Clustering patients into three groups resulted in a stratification distinct from the TNM classification. In conclusion, AI machine learning using routine clinical data can help evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer, with prognosis differing according to AI-identified clusters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10579989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105799892023-10-18 Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer Kuwayama, Naoki Hoshino, Isamu Mori, Yasukuni Yokota, Hajime Iwatate, Yosuke Uno, Takashi Oncol Lett Articles The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Experiments were conducted using four machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and deep neural network (DNN), to classify good or poor post-5-year prognosis based on clinicopathological data and post-5-year relapse occurrence. For each machine learning method, the importance was sorted in descending order (from the most to the least); the top features were used for clustering using the k-medoids method. The prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year survival were as follows: LR, 76.8% and 0.702; RF, 72.5% and 0.721; GB, 75.3% and 0.73; DNN, 76.9% and 0.682, respectively. The prediction accuracy and AUC for 5-year recurrence-free survival were as follows: LR, 85.5% and 0.692; RF, 79.0% and 0.721; GB, 80.5% and 0.718; DNN, 83.2% and 0.670. Clustering patients into three groups resulted in a stratification distinct from the TNM classification. In conclusion, AI machine learning using routine clinical data can help evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer, with prognosis differing according to AI-identified clusters. D.A. Spandidos 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10579989/ /pubmed/37854867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087 Text en Copyright: © Kuwayama et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Kuwayama, Naoki Hoshino, Isamu Mori, Yasukuni Yokota, Hajime Iwatate, Yosuke Uno, Takashi Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title | Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title_full | Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title_short | Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
title_sort | applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuwayamanaoki applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer AT hoshinoisamu applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer AT moriyasukuni applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer AT yokotahajime applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer AT iwatateyosuke applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer AT unotakashi applyingartificialintelligenceusingroutineclinicaldataforpreoperativediagnosisandprognosisevaluationofgastriccancer |