Cargando…

Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?

Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manero-Azua, Africa, Pereda, Arrate, Llano-Rivas, Isabel, Garin, Intza, Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056
_version_ 1785121871437496320
author Manero-Azua, Africa
Pereda, Arrate
Llano-Rivas, Isabel
Garin, Intza
Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar
author_facet Manero-Azua, Africa
Pereda, Arrate
Llano-Rivas, Isabel
Garin, Intza
Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar
author_sort Manero-Azua, Africa
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month-old girl with clinical suspicion of Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS). Methods: Following the international SRS consensus, methylation alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) at 11p15 region and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 were analysed and discarded by MS-MLPA. Results: Unexpectedly, the 11p15 region MS-MLPA showed a decrease in the signal of a copy number reference probe. Deletions affecting a single probe are inconclusive. So, we faced the ethical dilemma of whether it was appropriate to confirm this alteration with independent techniques and to offer a diagnostic possibility that was in no way related to clinical suspicion. Fortunately, in this particular case, the informed consent had not been specific to a particular pathology but to any disorder associated with growth failure. Performed alternative studies allowed the final diagnosis of 22q deletion syndrome. Conclusion: We demonstrate the importance of informing patients about the possibility of obtaining incidental findings in genetic techniques (not only in next generation sequencing) during pre-test genetic counselling consultations. In addition, we highlight the relevance of including in the informed consent the option of knowing these unexpected incidental findings as in some cases, this will help to elucidate the definitive diagnosis and provide the correct follow-up and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10580081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105800812023-10-18 Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? Manero-Azua, Africa Pereda, Arrate Llano-Rivas, Isabel Garin, Intza Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar Front Genet Genetics Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month-old girl with clinical suspicion of Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS). Methods: Following the international SRS consensus, methylation alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) at 11p15 region and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 were analysed and discarded by MS-MLPA. Results: Unexpectedly, the 11p15 region MS-MLPA showed a decrease in the signal of a copy number reference probe. Deletions affecting a single probe are inconclusive. So, we faced the ethical dilemma of whether it was appropriate to confirm this alteration with independent techniques and to offer a diagnostic possibility that was in no way related to clinical suspicion. Fortunately, in this particular case, the informed consent had not been specific to a particular pathology but to any disorder associated with growth failure. Performed alternative studies allowed the final diagnosis of 22q deletion syndrome. Conclusion: We demonstrate the importance of informing patients about the possibility of obtaining incidental findings in genetic techniques (not only in next generation sequencing) during pre-test genetic counselling consultations. In addition, we highlight the relevance of including in the informed consent the option of knowing these unexpected incidental findings as in some cases, this will help to elucidate the definitive diagnosis and provide the correct follow-up and treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10580081/ /pubmed/37854056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056 Text en Copyright © 2023 Manero-Azua, Pereda, Llano-Rivas, Garin and Perez de Nanclares. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Manero-Azua, Africa
Pereda, Arrate
Llano-Rivas, Isabel
Garin, Intza
Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar
Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title_full Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title_fullStr Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title_full_unstemmed Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title_short Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
title_sort incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (ms-mlpa): how to proceed?
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056
work_keys_str_mv AT maneroazuaafrica incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed
AT peredaarrate incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed
AT llanorivasisabel incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed
AT garinintza incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed
AT perezdenanclaresguiomar incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed