Cargando…
Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed?
Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056 |
_version_ | 1785121871437496320 |
---|---|
author | Manero-Azua, Africa Pereda, Arrate Llano-Rivas, Isabel Garin, Intza Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar |
author_facet | Manero-Azua, Africa Pereda, Arrate Llano-Rivas, Isabel Garin, Intza Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar |
author_sort | Manero-Azua, Africa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month-old girl with clinical suspicion of Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS). Methods: Following the international SRS consensus, methylation alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) at 11p15 region and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 were analysed and discarded by MS-MLPA. Results: Unexpectedly, the 11p15 region MS-MLPA showed a decrease in the signal of a copy number reference probe. Deletions affecting a single probe are inconclusive. So, we faced the ethical dilemma of whether it was appropriate to confirm this alteration with independent techniques and to offer a diagnostic possibility that was in no way related to clinical suspicion. Fortunately, in this particular case, the informed consent had not been specific to a particular pathology but to any disorder associated with growth failure. Performed alternative studies allowed the final diagnosis of 22q deletion syndrome. Conclusion: We demonstrate the importance of informing patients about the possibility of obtaining incidental findings in genetic techniques (not only in next generation sequencing) during pre-test genetic counselling consultations. In addition, we highlight the relevance of including in the informed consent the option of knowing these unexpected incidental findings as in some cases, this will help to elucidate the definitive diagnosis and provide the correct follow-up and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10580081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105800812023-10-18 Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? Manero-Azua, Africa Pereda, Arrate Llano-Rivas, Isabel Garin, Intza Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar Front Genet Genetics Introduction: Since the advent of new generation sequencing, professionals are aware of the possibility of obtaining findings unrelated to the pathology under study. However, this possibility is usually forgotten in the case of studies aimed at a single gene or region. We report a case of a 16-month-old girl with clinical suspicion of Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS). Methods: Following the international SRS consensus, methylation alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) at 11p15 region and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 were analysed and discarded by MS-MLPA. Results: Unexpectedly, the 11p15 region MS-MLPA showed a decrease in the signal of a copy number reference probe. Deletions affecting a single probe are inconclusive. So, we faced the ethical dilemma of whether it was appropriate to confirm this alteration with independent techniques and to offer a diagnostic possibility that was in no way related to clinical suspicion. Fortunately, in this particular case, the informed consent had not been specific to a particular pathology but to any disorder associated with growth failure. Performed alternative studies allowed the final diagnosis of 22q deletion syndrome. Conclusion: We demonstrate the importance of informing patients about the possibility of obtaining incidental findings in genetic techniques (not only in next generation sequencing) during pre-test genetic counselling consultations. In addition, we highlight the relevance of including in the informed consent the option of knowing these unexpected incidental findings as in some cases, this will help to elucidate the definitive diagnosis and provide the correct follow-up and treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10580081/ /pubmed/37854056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056 Text en Copyright © 2023 Manero-Azua, Pereda, Llano-Rivas, Garin and Perez de Nanclares. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Manero-Azua, Africa Pereda, Arrate Llano-Rivas, Isabel Garin, Intza Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title | Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title_full | Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title_fullStr | Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title_short | Incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA): how to proceed? |
title_sort | incidental finding at methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (ms-mlpa): how to proceed? |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1274056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maneroazuaafrica incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed AT peredaarrate incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed AT llanorivasisabel incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed AT garinintza incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed AT perezdenanclaresguiomar incidentalfindingatmethylationspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmsmlpahowtoproceed |