Cargando…

Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis

Transaxillary access has been the most frequently used nonfemoral access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve. Use of transcarotid TAVR is increasing; however, comparative data on these methods are limited. We compared outcomes following transcarotid or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Keith B., Watson, Daniel, Vora, Amit N., Mahoney, Paul, Chhatriwalla, Adnan K., Schwartz, Jonathan G., Keller, Antoine, Sodhi, Nishtha, Haugan, Daniel, Caskey, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.07.019
_version_ 1785121886287429632
author Allen, Keith B.
Watson, Daniel
Vora, Amit N.
Mahoney, Paul
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K.
Schwartz, Jonathan G.
Keller, Antoine
Sodhi, Nishtha
Haugan, Daniel
Caskey, Michael
author_facet Allen, Keith B.
Watson, Daniel
Vora, Amit N.
Mahoney, Paul
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K.
Schwartz, Jonathan G.
Keller, Antoine
Sodhi, Nishtha
Haugan, Daniel
Caskey, Michael
author_sort Allen, Keith B.
collection PubMed
description Transaxillary access has been the most frequently used nonfemoral access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve. Use of transcarotid TAVR is increasing; however, comparative data on these methods are limited. We compared outcomes following transcarotid or transaxillary TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular valve. METHODS: The Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was queried for TAVR procedures using transaxillary and transcarotid access between July 2015 and June 2021. Patients received a self-expanding Evolut R, PRO, or PRO + valve (Medtronic) and had 1-year follow-up. Thirty-day and 1-year outcomes were compared in transcarotid and transaxillary groups after 1:2 propensity score-matching. Multivariable regression models were fitted to identify predictors of key end points. RESULTS: The propensity score–matched cohort included 576 patients receiving transcarotid and 1142 receiving transaxillary access. Median procedure time (99 vs 118 minutes; P < .001) and hospital stay (2 vs 3 days; P < .001) were shorter with transcarotid versus transaxillary access. At 30 days, patients with transcarotid access had similar mortality (Kaplan–Meier estimates 3.7% vs 4.3%, P = .57) but significantly lower stroke (3.1% vs 5.9%; P = .017) and mortality or stroke (6.0% vs 8.9%; P = .033) compared with patients receiving transaxillary access. Similar differences were observed at 1 year. Transaxillary access was associated with increased risk of 30-day stroke (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.58) by multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for TAVR using a self-expanding valve is associated with procedural benefits and significantly lower stroke and mortality or stroke at 30 days. In patients with unsuitable femoral anatomy, transcarotid access may be the preferred delivery route for self-expanding valves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10580150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105801502023-10-18 Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis Allen, Keith B. Watson, Daniel Vora, Amit N. Mahoney, Paul Chhatriwalla, Adnan K. Schwartz, Jonathan G. Keller, Antoine Sodhi, Nishtha Haugan, Daniel Caskey, Michael JTCVS Tech Adult: Aortic Valve Transaxillary access has been the most frequently used nonfemoral access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve. Use of transcarotid TAVR is increasing; however, comparative data on these methods are limited. We compared outcomes following transcarotid or transaxillary TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular valve. METHODS: The Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was queried for TAVR procedures using transaxillary and transcarotid access between July 2015 and June 2021. Patients received a self-expanding Evolut R, PRO, or PRO + valve (Medtronic) and had 1-year follow-up. Thirty-day and 1-year outcomes were compared in transcarotid and transaxillary groups after 1:2 propensity score-matching. Multivariable regression models were fitted to identify predictors of key end points. RESULTS: The propensity score–matched cohort included 576 patients receiving transcarotid and 1142 receiving transaxillary access. Median procedure time (99 vs 118 minutes; P < .001) and hospital stay (2 vs 3 days; P < .001) were shorter with transcarotid versus transaxillary access. At 30 days, patients with transcarotid access had similar mortality (Kaplan–Meier estimates 3.7% vs 4.3%, P = .57) but significantly lower stroke (3.1% vs 5.9%; P = .017) and mortality or stroke (6.0% vs 8.9%; P = .033) compared with patients receiving transaxillary access. Similar differences were observed at 1 year. Transaxillary access was associated with increased risk of 30-day stroke (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.58) by multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for TAVR using a self-expanding valve is associated with procedural benefits and significantly lower stroke and mortality or stroke at 30 days. In patients with unsuitable femoral anatomy, transcarotid access may be the preferred delivery route for self-expanding valves. Elsevier 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10580150/ /pubmed/37854813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.07.019 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Aortic Valve
Allen, Keith B.
Watson, Daniel
Vora, Amit N.
Mahoney, Paul
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K.
Schwartz, Jonathan G.
Keller, Antoine
Sodhi, Nishtha
Haugan, Daniel
Caskey, Michael
Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title_full Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title_fullStr Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title_short Transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: A propensity-matched analysis
title_sort transcarotid versus transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: a propensity-matched analysis
topic Adult: Aortic Valve
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.07.019
work_keys_str_mv AT allenkeithb transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT watsondaniel transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT voraamitn transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT mahoneypaul transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT chhatriwallaadnank transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT schwartzjonathang transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT kellerantoine transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT sodhinishtha transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT haugandaniel transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT caskeymichael transcarotidversustransaxillaryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithaselfexpandingvalveapropensitymatchedanalysis