Cargando…

Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic differences in the impact of alcohol consumption on health have been consistently reported in the so-called “alcohol harm paradox” (i.e., individuals from higher socioeconomic backgrounds (SES) drink more alcohol than individuals from lower SES, but the latter accrue more a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Samantha Marie, Jørgensen, Magnus, Lowthian, Emily, Kristensen, Sara Madeleine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16952-6
_version_ 1785121978565263360
author Harris, Samantha Marie
Jørgensen, Magnus
Lowthian, Emily
Kristensen, Sara Madeleine
author_facet Harris, Samantha Marie
Jørgensen, Magnus
Lowthian, Emily
Kristensen, Sara Madeleine
author_sort Harris, Samantha Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic differences in the impact of alcohol consumption on health have been consistently reported in the so-called “alcohol harm paradox” (i.e., individuals from higher socioeconomic backgrounds (SES) drink more alcohol than individuals from lower SES, but the latter accrue more alcohol-related harm). Despite the severe health risks of smoking however, there is a scarcity of studies examining a possible “smoking harm paradox” (SHP). We aim to fill this gap. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with adolescents from the Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour Study (NLHB). Our study used data from ages 13 to 30 years. To analyse our data, we used the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) with smoking and self-reported health as mutual lagged predictors and outcomes as well as parental income and education as grouping variables. Parental income and education were used as proxies for adolescent socioeconomic status (SES). Smoking was examined through frequency of smoking (every day, every week, less than once a week, not at all). General health compared to others was measured by self-report. RESULTS: Overall, we found inconclusive evidence of the smoking harm paradox, as not all effects from smoking to self-reported health were moderated by SES. Nevertheless, the findings do suggest that smoking predicted worse subjective health over time among individuals in the lower parental education group compared with those in the higher parental education group. This pattern was not found for parental income. CONCLUSIONS: While our results suggest limited evidence for a smoking harm paradox (SHP), they also suggest that the impact of adolescent smoking on later subjective health is significant for individuals with low parental education but not individuals with high parental education. This effect was not found for parental income, highlighting the potential influence of parental education over income as a determinant of subjective health outcomes in relation to smoking. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16952-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10580607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105806072023-10-18 Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study Harris, Samantha Marie Jørgensen, Magnus Lowthian, Emily Kristensen, Sara Madeleine BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic differences in the impact of alcohol consumption on health have been consistently reported in the so-called “alcohol harm paradox” (i.e., individuals from higher socioeconomic backgrounds (SES) drink more alcohol than individuals from lower SES, but the latter accrue more alcohol-related harm). Despite the severe health risks of smoking however, there is a scarcity of studies examining a possible “smoking harm paradox” (SHP). We aim to fill this gap. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with adolescents from the Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour Study (NLHB). Our study used data from ages 13 to 30 years. To analyse our data, we used the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) with smoking and self-reported health as mutual lagged predictors and outcomes as well as parental income and education as grouping variables. Parental income and education were used as proxies for adolescent socioeconomic status (SES). Smoking was examined through frequency of smoking (every day, every week, less than once a week, not at all). General health compared to others was measured by self-report. RESULTS: Overall, we found inconclusive evidence of the smoking harm paradox, as not all effects from smoking to self-reported health were moderated by SES. Nevertheless, the findings do suggest that smoking predicted worse subjective health over time among individuals in the lower parental education group compared with those in the higher parental education group. This pattern was not found for parental income. CONCLUSIONS: While our results suggest limited evidence for a smoking harm paradox (SHP), they also suggest that the impact of adolescent smoking on later subjective health is significant for individuals with low parental education but not individuals with high parental education. This effect was not found for parental income, highlighting the potential influence of parental education over income as a determinant of subjective health outcomes in relation to smoking. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16952-6. BioMed Central 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10580607/ /pubmed/37848880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16952-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Harris, Samantha Marie
Jørgensen, Magnus
Lowthian, Emily
Kristensen, Sara Madeleine
Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title_full Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title_fullStr Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title_short Up in smoke? Limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
title_sort up in smoke? limited evidence of a smoking harm paradox in 17-year cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16952-6
work_keys_str_mv AT harrissamanthamarie upinsmokelimitedevidenceofasmokingharmparadoxin17yearcohortstudy
AT jørgensenmagnus upinsmokelimitedevidenceofasmokingharmparadoxin17yearcohortstudy
AT lowthianemily upinsmokelimitedevidenceofasmokingharmparadoxin17yearcohortstudy
AT kristensensaramadeleine upinsmokelimitedevidenceofasmokingharmparadoxin17yearcohortstudy