Cargando…
Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjun...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463 |
_version_ | 1785122013852991488 |
---|---|
author | Perenic, Emma Grember, Emilie Bassard, Sébastien Koutlidis, Nicolas |
author_facet | Perenic, Emma Grember, Emilie Bassard, Sébastien Koutlidis, Nicolas |
author_sort | Perenic, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, N = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, N = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (p = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), p = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); p = 0.023)]. CONCLUSIONS: The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10580802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105808022023-10-18 Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy Perenic, Emma Grember, Emilie Bassard, Sébastien Koutlidis, Nicolas Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, N = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, N = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (p = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), p = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); p = 0.023)]. CONCLUSIONS: The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10580802/ /pubmed/37854306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463 Text en © 2023 Perenic, Grember, Bassard and Koutildis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pain Research Perenic, Emma Grember, Emilie Bassard, Sébastien Koutlidis, Nicolas Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title | Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title_full | Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title_fullStr | Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title_short | Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy |
title_sort | impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal mri-guided prostate biopsy |
topic | Pain Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perenicemma impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy AT gremberemilie impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy AT bassardsebastien impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy AT koutlidisnicolas impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy |