Cargando…

Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perenic, Emma, Grember, Emilie, Bassard, Sébastien, Koutlidis, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463
_version_ 1785122013852991488
author Perenic, Emma
Grember, Emilie
Bassard, Sébastien
Koutlidis, Nicolas
author_facet Perenic, Emma
Grember, Emilie
Bassard, Sébastien
Koutlidis, Nicolas
author_sort Perenic, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, N = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, N = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (p = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), p = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); p = 0.023)]. CONCLUSIONS: The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10580802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105808022023-10-18 Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy Perenic, Emma Grember, Emilie Bassard, Sébastien Koutlidis, Nicolas Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, N = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, N = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (p = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), p = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); p = 0.023)]. CONCLUSIONS: The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10580802/ /pubmed/37854306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463 Text en © 2023 Perenic, Grember, Bassard and Koutildis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Perenic, Emma
Grember, Emilie
Bassard, Sébastien
Koutlidis, Nicolas
Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title_full Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title_short Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
title_sort impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal mri-guided prostate biopsy
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463
work_keys_str_mv AT perenicemma impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy
AT gremberemilie impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy
AT bassardsebastien impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy
AT koutlidisnicolas impactofvirtualrealityonpainmanagementintransrectalmriguidedprostatebiopsy