Cargando…

A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction

Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Jennifer N., Hanson, Blake M., Hunter, Tayler, Simar, Shelby R., Duran Ramirez, Jesus M., Obernuefemann, Chloe L. P., Parikh, Rajiv P., Tenenbaum, Marissa M., Margenthaler, Julie A., Hultgren, Scott J., Myckatyn, Terence M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01430-23
_version_ 1785122078918180864
author Walker, Jennifer N.
Hanson, Blake M.
Hunter, Tayler
Simar, Shelby R.
Duran Ramirez, Jesus M.
Obernuefemann, Chloe L. P.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
Margenthaler, Julie A.
Hultgren, Scott J.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
author_facet Walker, Jennifer N.
Hanson, Blake M.
Hunter, Tayler
Simar, Shelby R.
Duran Ramirez, Jesus M.
Obernuefemann, Chloe L. P.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
Margenthaler, Julie A.
Hultgren, Scott J.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
author_sort Walker, Jennifer N.
collection PubMed
description Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice. We performed a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of saline irrigation alone to a triple antibiotic irrigation regimen (1 g cefazolin, 80 mg gentamicin, and 50,000 units of bacitracin in 500 mL of saline) for breast implant surgery. The microbiome in breasts with cancer (n = 16) was compared to those without (n = 16), as all patients (n = 16) had unilateral cancers but bilateral mastectomies (n = 32). Biologic and prosthetic specimens procured both at the time of mastectomy and during TE removal months later were analyzed for longitudinal comparison. Outcomes included clinical infection, bacterial abundance, and relative microbiome composition. No patient in either group suffered a reconstructive failure or developed an infection. Triple antibiotic irrigation administered at the time of immediate TE reconstruction did not reduce bacterial abundance or impact microbial diversity relative to saline irrigation at the time of planned exchange. Implanted prosthetic material adopted the microbial composition of the surrounding host tissue. In cancer-naïve breasts, relative to saline, antibiotic irrigation increased bacterial abundance on periprosthetic capsules (P = 0.03) and acellular dermal matrices (P = 0.04) and altered the microbiota on both. These data show that, relative to saline only, the use of triple antibiotic irrigation in TE breast reconstruction does impact the bacterial abundance and diversity of certain biomaterials from cancer-naïve breasts. IMPORTANCE: The lifetime risk of breast cancer is ~13% in women and is treated with a mastectomy in ~50% of cases. The majority are reconstructed, usually starting with a tissue expander to help restore the volume for a subsequent permanent breast implant or the women’s own tissues. The biopsychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction, though, can be tempered by a high complication rate of at least 7% but over 30% in some women. Bacterial infection is the most common complication, and can lead to treatment delays, patient physical and emotional distress and escalating health care cost. To limit this risk, plastic surgeons have tried a variety of strategies to limit bacterial infection including irrigating the pocket created after removing the breast implant with antibiotic solutions, but good-quality data are scarce. Herein, we study the value of antibiotics in pocket irrigation using a robust randomized clinical trial design and molecular microbiology approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10581127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105811272023-10-18 A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction Walker, Jennifer N. Hanson, Blake M. Hunter, Tayler Simar, Shelby R. Duran Ramirez, Jesus M. Obernuefemann, Chloe L. P. Parikh, Rajiv P. Tenenbaum, Marissa M. Margenthaler, Julie A. Hultgren, Scott J. Myckatyn, Terence M. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice. We performed a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of saline irrigation alone to a triple antibiotic irrigation regimen (1 g cefazolin, 80 mg gentamicin, and 50,000 units of bacitracin in 500 mL of saline) for breast implant surgery. The microbiome in breasts with cancer (n = 16) was compared to those without (n = 16), as all patients (n = 16) had unilateral cancers but bilateral mastectomies (n = 32). Biologic and prosthetic specimens procured both at the time of mastectomy and during TE removal months later were analyzed for longitudinal comparison. Outcomes included clinical infection, bacterial abundance, and relative microbiome composition. No patient in either group suffered a reconstructive failure or developed an infection. Triple antibiotic irrigation administered at the time of immediate TE reconstruction did not reduce bacterial abundance or impact microbial diversity relative to saline irrigation at the time of planned exchange. Implanted prosthetic material adopted the microbial composition of the surrounding host tissue. In cancer-naïve breasts, relative to saline, antibiotic irrigation increased bacterial abundance on periprosthetic capsules (P = 0.03) and acellular dermal matrices (P = 0.04) and altered the microbiota on both. These data show that, relative to saline only, the use of triple antibiotic irrigation in TE breast reconstruction does impact the bacterial abundance and diversity of certain biomaterials from cancer-naïve breasts. IMPORTANCE: The lifetime risk of breast cancer is ~13% in women and is treated with a mastectomy in ~50% of cases. The majority are reconstructed, usually starting with a tissue expander to help restore the volume for a subsequent permanent breast implant or the women’s own tissues. The biopsychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction, though, can be tempered by a high complication rate of at least 7% but over 30% in some women. Bacterial infection is the most common complication, and can lead to treatment delays, patient physical and emotional distress and escalating health care cost. To limit this risk, plastic surgeons have tried a variety of strategies to limit bacterial infection including irrigating the pocket created after removing the breast implant with antibiotic solutions, but good-quality data are scarce. Herein, we study the value of antibiotics in pocket irrigation using a robust randomized clinical trial design and molecular microbiology approaches. American Society for Microbiology 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10581127/ /pubmed/37754546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01430-23 Text en Copyright © 2023 Walker et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Walker, Jennifer N.
Hanson, Blake M.
Hunter, Tayler
Simar, Shelby R.
Duran Ramirez, Jesus M.
Obernuefemann, Chloe L. P.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
Margenthaler, Julie A.
Hultgren, Scott J.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title_full A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title_fullStr A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title_short A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
title_sort prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01430-23
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerjennifern aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT hansonblakem aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT huntertayler aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT simarshelbyr aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT duranramirezjesusm aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT obernuefemannchloelp aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT parikhrajivp aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT tenenbaummarissam aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT margenthalerjuliea aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT hultgrenscottj aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT myckatynterencem aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT walkerjennifern prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT hansonblakem prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT huntertayler prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT simarshelbyr prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT duranramirezjesusm prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT obernuefemannchloelp prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT parikhrajivp prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT tenenbaummarissam prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT margenthalerjuliea prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT hultgrenscottj prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction
AT myckatynterencem prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialtoassessantibioticpocketirrigationontissueexpanderbreastreconstruction