Cargando…

Somatostatin Receptor–Directed PET/CT Can Differentiate Between Different Subtypes of Head and Neck Paragangliomas

BACKGROUND: Given their neuroendocrine origin, head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) can be imaged with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)–directed PET/CT. We aimed to determine whether the in vivo PET signal can differentiate between varying HNPGL subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with HN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhi, Yingjun, Gerhard-Hartmann, Elena, Hartrampf, Philipp E., Weich, Alexander, Higuchi, Takahiro, Bley, Thorsten A., Hackenberg, Stephan, Hagen, Rudolf, Rosenwald, Andreas, Scherzad, Agmal, Remde, Hanna, Fassnacht, Martin, Werner, Rudolf A., Serfling, Sebastian E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37756444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004870
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Given their neuroendocrine origin, head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) can be imaged with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)–directed PET/CT. We aimed to determine whether the in vivo PET signal can differentiate between varying HNPGL subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with HNPGL received pretherapeutic SSTR-PET/CTs using (68)Ga-DOTATOC. Six (42.9%) patients had a jugular paraganglioma (PGL-J), 5 (35.7%) were diagnosed with carotid paraganglioma (PGL-Cs), and the remaining 3 patients (21.4%) had PGL-C with pathogenic SDHx germline variants (PGL-C-SDH). A visual and quantitative assessment of the primary tumor on SSTR-PET was performed, including SUV(max) and target-to-background ratio (TBR). Quantitative values were then compared between subgroups of patients affected with different HNPGL entities. RESULTS: On visual assessment, all primary HNPGLs could be identified on SSTR-PET/CT. Quantification of HNPGL revealed substantially elevated SUV(max) in PGL-J (101.7 ± 58.5) when compared with PGL-C-SDH (13.4 ± 5.6, P < 0.05), but not when compared with PGL-C (66.7 ± 27.3, P = 0.4; PGL-C vs PGL-C-SDH, P = 0.2). TBR of PGL-J (202.9 ± 82.2), however, further differentiated between PGL-C (95.7 ± 45.4, P < 0.05) and PGL-C-SDH (20.4 ± 12.2, P < 0.01; PGL-C vs PGL-C-SDH, P = 0.3). Moreover, whole-body readout revealed metastases in 2/3 (66.7%) of PGL-C-SDH patients, with a single SSTR-expressing skeletal lesion in one subject and bipulmonary lesions in the other patient. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HNPGL, SSTR-PET/CT identified the primary and metastatic disease and provides substantially elevated TBR, indicating excellent image contrast. PET-based quantification can also differentiate between varying HNPGL subtypes.