Cargando…

The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat

Quantitative bacterial culture (QBC) is the gold standard for determining urinary tract infections. However, the majority of urine samples were sent to a lab for further bacterial culture. Therefore, the storage condition was vital to maintain the quality and accuracy of the urine samples. The main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lien, Ching-Jung, Wang, Shang-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37981906
http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/111/2022-VETMED
_version_ 1785145976883773440
author Lien, Ching-Jung
Wang, Shang-Lin
author_facet Lien, Ching-Jung
Wang, Shang-Lin
author_sort Lien, Ching-Jung
collection PubMed
description Quantitative bacterial culture (QBC) is the gold standard for determining urinary tract infections. However, the majority of urine samples were sent to a lab for further bacterial culture. Therefore, the storage condition was vital to maintain the quality and accuracy of the urine samples. The main objective of our study was to examine the urine QBC outcomes of (1) immediate culture, (2) culture after urine sample storage at ambient temperature for 24 h, and (3) culture after urine sample storage at 4 °C for 24 hours. There were 49 feline samples and 30 canine samples included in this study. All QBC samples kept at ambient temperature and refrigerator were consistent with immediate QBC in cats. Eight positive results from immediate QBC were in accordance with refrigerated results in dogs. There were ten positive results in the room-temperature sample with two false-positive results. Our study showed that storing conditions at room temperature or refrigeration for 24 h does not impact the results of QBC in cat urine samples. For dog samples, chilled samples have a higher accuracy rate than room temperature samples, although the overall agreement was still satisfactory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10581515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105815152023-11-17 The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat Lien, Ching-Jung Wang, Shang-Lin Vet Med (Praha) Original Paper Quantitative bacterial culture (QBC) is the gold standard for determining urinary tract infections. However, the majority of urine samples were sent to a lab for further bacterial culture. Therefore, the storage condition was vital to maintain the quality and accuracy of the urine samples. The main objective of our study was to examine the urine QBC outcomes of (1) immediate culture, (2) culture after urine sample storage at ambient temperature for 24 h, and (3) culture after urine sample storage at 4 °C for 24 hours. There were 49 feline samples and 30 canine samples included in this study. All QBC samples kept at ambient temperature and refrigerator were consistent with immediate QBC in cats. Eight positive results from immediate QBC were in accordance with refrigerated results in dogs. There were ten positive results in the room-temperature sample with two false-positive results. Our study showed that storing conditions at room temperature or refrigeration for 24 h does not impact the results of QBC in cat urine samples. For dog samples, chilled samples have a higher accuracy rate than room temperature samples, although the overall agreement was still satisfactory. Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10581515/ /pubmed/37981906 http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/111/2022-VETMED Text en Copyright: © 2023 Lien and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lien, Ching-Jung
Wang, Shang-Lin
The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title_full The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title_fullStr The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title_full_unstemmed The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title_short The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
title_sort impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37981906
http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/111/2022-VETMED
work_keys_str_mv AT lienchingjung theimpactofurinestoragemethodsontheresultsofquantitativebacterialcultureindogandcat
AT wangshanglin theimpactofurinestoragemethodsontheresultsofquantitativebacterialcultureindogandcat
AT lienchingjung impactofurinestoragemethodsontheresultsofquantitativebacterialcultureindogandcat
AT wangshanglin impactofurinestoragemethodsontheresultsofquantitativebacterialcultureindogandcat