Cargando…

The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Darrion B., Smith, Alexander D., Smith, Emily J., Naik, Anant, Janbahan, Mika, Thompson, Charee M., Varshney, Lav R., Hassaneen, Wael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618
_version_ 1785122203196456960
author Yang, Darrion B.
Smith, Alexander D.
Smith, Emily J.
Naik, Anant
Janbahan, Mika
Thompson, Charee M.
Varshney, Lav R.
Hassaneen, Wael
author_facet Yang, Darrion B.
Smith, Alexander D.
Smith, Emily J.
Naik, Anant
Janbahan, Mika
Thompson, Charee M.
Varshney, Lav R.
Hassaneen, Wael
author_sort Yang, Darrion B.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed all papers that used at least one ML algorithm to predict outcomes after transsphenoidal surgery. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to May 12, 2021. We identified 13 studies enrolling 5,048 patients. We extracted the general characteristics of each study; the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the ML models developed as well as the features identified as important by the ML models. We identified 12 studies with 5,048 patients that included ML algorithms for adenomas, three with 1807 patients specifically for acromegaly, and five with 2105 patients specifically for Cushing's disease. Nearly all were single-institution studies. The studies used a heterogeneous mix of ML algorithms and features to build predictive models. All papers reported an AUC greater than 0.7, which indicates clinical utility. ML algorithms have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery and can improve patient care. Ensemble algorithms and neural networks were often top performers when compared with other ML algorithms. Biochemical and preoperative features were most likely to be selected as important by ML models. Inexplicability remains a challenge, but algorithms such as local interpretable model–agnostic explanation or Shapley value can increase explainability of ML algorithms. Our analysis shows that ML algorithms have the potential to greatly assist surgeons in clinical decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10581827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105818272023-10-18 The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review Yang, Darrion B. Smith, Alexander D. Smith, Emily J. Naik, Anant Janbahan, Mika Thompson, Charee M. Varshney, Lav R. Hassaneen, Wael J Neurol Surg B Skull Base The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed all papers that used at least one ML algorithm to predict outcomes after transsphenoidal surgery. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to May 12, 2021. We identified 13 studies enrolling 5,048 patients. We extracted the general characteristics of each study; the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the ML models developed as well as the features identified as important by the ML models. We identified 12 studies with 5,048 patients that included ML algorithms for adenomas, three with 1807 patients specifically for acromegaly, and five with 2105 patients specifically for Cushing's disease. Nearly all were single-institution studies. The studies used a heterogeneous mix of ML algorithms and features to build predictive models. All papers reported an AUC greater than 0.7, which indicates clinical utility. ML algorithms have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery and can improve patient care. Ensemble algorithms and neural networks were often top performers when compared with other ML algorithms. Biochemical and preoperative features were most likely to be selected as important by ML models. Inexplicability remains a challenge, but algorithms such as local interpretable model–agnostic explanation or Shapley value can increase explainability of ML algorithms. Our analysis shows that ML algorithms have the potential to greatly assist surgeons in clinical decision making. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10581827/ /pubmed/37854535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Yang, Darrion B.
Smith, Alexander D.
Smith, Emily J.
Naik, Anant
Janbahan, Mika
Thompson, Charee M.
Varshney, Lav R.
Hassaneen, Wael
The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_short The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_sort state of machine learning in outcomes prediction of transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618
work_keys_str_mv AT yangdarrionb thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT smithalexanderd thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT smithemilyj thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT naikanant thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT janbahanmika thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT thompsonchareem thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT varshneylavr thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT hassaneenwael thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT yangdarrionb stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT smithalexanderd stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT smithemilyj stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT naikanant stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT janbahanmika stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT thompsonchareem stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT varshneylavr stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT hassaneenwael stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview