Cargando…
The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review
The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618 |
_version_ | 1785122203196456960 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Darrion B. Smith, Alexander D. Smith, Emily J. Naik, Anant Janbahan, Mika Thompson, Charee M. Varshney, Lav R. Hassaneen, Wael |
author_facet | Yang, Darrion B. Smith, Alexander D. Smith, Emily J. Naik, Anant Janbahan, Mika Thompson, Charee M. Varshney, Lav R. Hassaneen, Wael |
author_sort | Yang, Darrion B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed all papers that used at least one ML algorithm to predict outcomes after transsphenoidal surgery. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to May 12, 2021. We identified 13 studies enrolling 5,048 patients. We extracted the general characteristics of each study; the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the ML models developed as well as the features identified as important by the ML models. We identified 12 studies with 5,048 patients that included ML algorithms for adenomas, three with 1807 patients specifically for acromegaly, and five with 2105 patients specifically for Cushing's disease. Nearly all were single-institution studies. The studies used a heterogeneous mix of ML algorithms and features to build predictive models. All papers reported an AUC greater than 0.7, which indicates clinical utility. ML algorithms have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery and can improve patient care. Ensemble algorithms and neural networks were often top performers when compared with other ML algorithms. Biochemical and preoperative features were most likely to be selected as important by ML models. Inexplicability remains a challenge, but algorithms such as local interpretable model–agnostic explanation or Shapley value can increase explainability of ML algorithms. Our analysis shows that ML algorithms have the potential to greatly assist surgeons in clinical decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10581827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105818272023-10-18 The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review Yang, Darrion B. Smith, Alexander D. Smith, Emily J. Naik, Anant Janbahan, Mika Thompson, Charee M. Varshney, Lav R. Hassaneen, Wael J Neurol Surg B Skull Base The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed all papers that used at least one ML algorithm to predict outcomes after transsphenoidal surgery. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to May 12, 2021. We identified 13 studies enrolling 5,048 patients. We extracted the general characteristics of each study; the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the ML models developed as well as the features identified as important by the ML models. We identified 12 studies with 5,048 patients that included ML algorithms for adenomas, three with 1807 patients specifically for acromegaly, and five with 2105 patients specifically for Cushing's disease. Nearly all were single-institution studies. The studies used a heterogeneous mix of ML algorithms and features to build predictive models. All papers reported an AUC greater than 0.7, which indicates clinical utility. ML algorithms have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery and can improve patient care. Ensemble algorithms and neural networks were often top performers when compared with other ML algorithms. Biochemical and preoperative features were most likely to be selected as important by ML models. Inexplicability remains a challenge, but algorithms such as local interpretable model–agnostic explanation or Shapley value can increase explainability of ML algorithms. Our analysis shows that ML algorithms have the potential to greatly assist surgeons in clinical decision making. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10581827/ /pubmed/37854535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Yang, Darrion B. Smith, Alexander D. Smith, Emily J. Naik, Anant Janbahan, Mika Thompson, Charee M. Varshney, Lav R. Hassaneen, Wael The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title | The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | state of machine learning in outcomes prediction of transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37854535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1941-3618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangdarrionb thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT smithalexanderd thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT smithemilyj thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT naikanant thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT janbahanmika thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT thompsonchareem thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT varshneylavr thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT hassaneenwael thestateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT yangdarrionb stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT smithalexanderd stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT smithemilyj stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT naikanant stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT janbahanmika stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT thompsonchareem stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT varshneylavr stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview AT hassaneenwael stateofmachinelearninginoutcomespredictionoftranssphenoidalsurgeryasystematicreview |