Cargando…
Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the typical changes that occur with aging to the periorbital area. The outcomes of this surgery are aesthetic, as well as functional. Many studies have described an impact on the cornea, intraocular pressure, dry ey...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03436-6 |
_version_ | 1785122219892932608 |
---|---|
author | Rodrigues, Catarina Carvalho, Francisco Marques, Marisa |
author_facet | Rodrigues, Catarina Carvalho, Francisco Marques, Marisa |
author_sort | Rodrigues, Catarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the typical changes that occur with aging to the periorbital area. The outcomes of this surgery are aesthetic, as well as functional. Many studies have described an impact on the cornea, intraocular pressure, dry eye syndrome, and visual quality. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the different surgical techniques and their outcomes. METHODS: The authors performed a literature review through online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CENTRAL libraries. Information was collected about the surgery techniques and the functional and aesthetic outcomes as well as complications of the interventions. Six types of upper blepharoplasty surgery were studied. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in our systematic review and nine in our meta-analysis. We presented results about intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, flattest keratometry, steepest keratometry, corneal astigmatism, visual acuity, Schirmer test 1 and 2, tear film break-up time and the ocular surface disease index questionnaire, according to type of surgery. Our meta-analysis showed no significant results. CONCLUSIONS: No significant results were found; however, many studies reported an impact of upper blepharoplasty surgery in the outcomes studied. Only a small number of complications were reported, and patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10581926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105819262023-10-19 Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Rodrigues, Catarina Carvalho, Francisco Marques, Marisa Aesthetic Plast Surg Review BACKGROUND: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the typical changes that occur with aging to the periorbital area. The outcomes of this surgery are aesthetic, as well as functional. Many studies have described an impact on the cornea, intraocular pressure, dry eye syndrome, and visual quality. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the different surgical techniques and their outcomes. METHODS: The authors performed a literature review through online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CENTRAL libraries. Information was collected about the surgery techniques and the functional and aesthetic outcomes as well as complications of the interventions. Six types of upper blepharoplasty surgery were studied. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in our systematic review and nine in our meta-analysis. We presented results about intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, flattest keratometry, steepest keratometry, corneal astigmatism, visual acuity, Schirmer test 1 and 2, tear film break-up time and the ocular surface disease index questionnaire, according to type of surgery. Our meta-analysis showed no significant results. CONCLUSIONS: No significant results were found; however, many studies reported an impact of upper blepharoplasty surgery in the outcomes studied. Only a small number of complications were reported, and patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2023-07-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10581926/ /pubmed/37430010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03436-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Rodrigues, Catarina Carvalho, Francisco Marques, Marisa Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and Results—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | upper eyelid blepharoplasty: surgical techniques and results—systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03436-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguescatarina uppereyelidblepharoplastysurgicaltechniquesandresultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carvalhofrancisco uppereyelidblepharoplastysurgicaltechniquesandresultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marquesmarisa uppereyelidblepharoplastysurgicaltechniquesandresultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |