Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction method (DLRecon) in 3D MR neurography for assessment of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five exams (18 brachial and 17 lumbosacral plexus) of 34 patients undergoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04362-z |
_version_ | 1785122221088309248 |
---|---|
author | Ensle, Falko Kaniewska, Malwina Tiessen, Anja Lohezic, Maelene Getzmann, Jonas M. Guggenberger, Roman |
author_facet | Ensle, Falko Kaniewska, Malwina Tiessen, Anja Lohezic, Maelene Getzmann, Jonas M. Guggenberger, Roman |
author_sort | Ensle, Falko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction method (DLRecon) in 3D MR neurography for assessment of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five exams (18 brachial and 17 lumbosacral plexus) of 34 patients undergoing routine clinical MR neurography at 1.5 T were retrospectively included (mean age: 49 ± 12 years, 15 female). Coronal 3D T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery fast spin echo with variable flip angle sequences covering plexial nerves on both sides were obtained as part of the standard protocol. In addition to standard-of-care (SOC) reconstruction, k-space was reconstructed with a 3D DLRecon algorithm. Two blinded readers evaluated images for image quality and diagnostic confidence in assessing nerves, muscles, and pathology using a 4-point scale. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between nerve, muscle, and fat were measured. For comparison of visual scoring result non-parametric paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank testing and for quantitative analysis paired sample Student’s t-testing was performed. RESULTS: DLRecon scored significantly higher than SOC in all categories of image quality (p < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence (p < 0.05), including conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology. With regard to artifacts there was no significant difference between the reconstruction methods. Quantitatively, DLRecon achieved significantly higher CNR and SNR than SOC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLRecon enhanced overall image quality, leading to improved conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology, and allowing for increased diagnostic confidence in evaluation of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10581934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105819342023-10-19 Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography Ensle, Falko Kaniewska, Malwina Tiessen, Anja Lohezic, Maelene Getzmann, Jonas M. Guggenberger, Roman Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction method (DLRecon) in 3D MR neurography for assessment of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five exams (18 brachial and 17 lumbosacral plexus) of 34 patients undergoing routine clinical MR neurography at 1.5 T were retrospectively included (mean age: 49 ± 12 years, 15 female). Coronal 3D T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery fast spin echo with variable flip angle sequences covering plexial nerves on both sides were obtained as part of the standard protocol. In addition to standard-of-care (SOC) reconstruction, k-space was reconstructed with a 3D DLRecon algorithm. Two blinded readers evaluated images for image quality and diagnostic confidence in assessing nerves, muscles, and pathology using a 4-point scale. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between nerve, muscle, and fat were measured. For comparison of visual scoring result non-parametric paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank testing and for quantitative analysis paired sample Student’s t-testing was performed. RESULTS: DLRecon scored significantly higher than SOC in all categories of image quality (p < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence (p < 0.05), including conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology. With regard to artifacts there was no significant difference between the reconstruction methods. Quantitatively, DLRecon achieved significantly higher CNR and SNR than SOC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLRecon enhanced overall image quality, leading to improved conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology, and allowing for increased diagnostic confidence in evaluation of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10581934/ /pubmed/37191931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04362-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Ensle, Falko Kaniewska, Malwina Tiessen, Anja Lohezic, Maelene Getzmann, Jonas M. Guggenberger, Roman Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title | Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3d mr neurography |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04362-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT enslefalko diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography AT kaniewskamalwina diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography AT tiessenanja diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography AT lohezicmaelene diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography AT getzmannjonasm diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography AT guggenbergerroman diagnosticperformanceofdeeplearningbasedreconstructionalgorithmin3dmrneurography |