Cargando…
Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the be...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6 |
_version_ | 1785122221623083008 |
---|---|
author | Baklouti, Sarah Comets, Emmanuelle Gandia, Peggy Concordet, Didier |
author_facet | Baklouti, Sarah Comets, Emmanuelle Gandia, Peggy Concordet, Didier |
author_sort | Baklouti, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the best-known methods are Visual Predictive Check (VPC) and Normalised Prediction Distribution Error (NPDE). Despite their usefulness, these methods have some limitations, especially for the analysis of dependent concentrations, i.e., evaluated in the same patient. OBJECTIVE: In this work, we propose an evaluation method that accounts for the dependency between concentrations. METHODS: Thanks to the study of the distribution of simulated vectors of concentrations, the method provides one probability per individual that its observations (i.e., concentrations) come from the studied model. The higher the probability, the better the model fits the individual. By examining the distribution of these probabilities for a set of individuals, we can evaluate the model as a whole. RESULTS: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through two examples. Our approach successfully detects misspecification in the structural model and identifies outlier kinetics in a set of kinetics. CONCLUSION: We propose a straightforward method for evaluating models during their development and selecting a model to perform therapeutic drug monitoring. Based on our preliminary results, the method is very promising but needs to be validated on a larger scale. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10581936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105819362023-10-19 Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation Baklouti, Sarah Comets, Emmanuelle Gandia, Peggy Concordet, Didier Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the best-known methods are Visual Predictive Check (VPC) and Normalised Prediction Distribution Error (NPDE). Despite their usefulness, these methods have some limitations, especially for the analysis of dependent concentrations, i.e., evaluated in the same patient. OBJECTIVE: In this work, we propose an evaluation method that accounts for the dependency between concentrations. METHODS: Thanks to the study of the distribution of simulated vectors of concentrations, the method provides one probability per individual that its observations (i.e., concentrations) come from the studied model. The higher the probability, the better the model fits the individual. By examining the distribution of these probabilities for a set of individuals, we can evaluate the model as a whole. RESULTS: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through two examples. Our approach successfully detects misspecification in the structural model and identifies outlier kinetics in a set of kinetics. CONCLUSION: We propose a straightforward method for evaluating models during their development and selecting a model to perform therapeutic drug monitoring. Based on our preliminary results, the method is very promising but needs to be validated on a larger scale. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10581936/ /pubmed/37717242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Baklouti, Sarah Comets, Emmanuelle Gandia, Peggy Concordet, Didier Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title | Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title_full | Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title_short | Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation |
title_sort | multivariate exact discrepancy: a new tool for pk/pd model evaluation |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakloutisarah multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation AT cometsemmanuelle multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation AT gandiapeggy multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation AT concordetdidier multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation |