Cargando…

Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baklouti, Sarah, Comets, Emmanuelle, Gandia, Peggy, Concordet, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6
_version_ 1785122221623083008
author Baklouti, Sarah
Comets, Emmanuelle
Gandia, Peggy
Concordet, Didier
author_facet Baklouti, Sarah
Comets, Emmanuelle
Gandia, Peggy
Concordet, Didier
author_sort Baklouti, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the best-known methods are Visual Predictive Check (VPC) and Normalised Prediction Distribution Error (NPDE). Despite their usefulness, these methods have some limitations, especially for the analysis of dependent concentrations, i.e., evaluated in the same patient. OBJECTIVE: In this work, we propose an evaluation method that accounts for the dependency between concentrations. METHODS: Thanks to the study of the distribution of simulated vectors of concentrations, the method provides one probability per individual that its observations (i.e., concentrations) come from the studied model. The higher the probability, the better the model fits the individual. By examining the distribution of these probabilities for a set of individuals, we can evaluate the model as a whole. RESULTS: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through two examples. Our approach successfully detects misspecification in the structural model and identifies outlier kinetics in a set of kinetics. CONCLUSION: We propose a straightforward method for evaluating models during their development and selecting a model to perform therapeutic drug monitoring. Based on our preliminary results, the method is very promising but needs to be validated on a larger scale. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10581936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105819362023-10-19 Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation Baklouti, Sarah Comets, Emmanuelle Gandia, Peggy Concordet, Didier Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic models are evaluated using three types of metrics: those based on estimating the typical pharmacokinetic parameters, those based on predicting individual pharmacokinetic parameters and those that compare data and model distributions. In the third groups of metrics, the best-known methods are Visual Predictive Check (VPC) and Normalised Prediction Distribution Error (NPDE). Despite their usefulness, these methods have some limitations, especially for the analysis of dependent concentrations, i.e., evaluated in the same patient. OBJECTIVE: In this work, we propose an evaluation method that accounts for the dependency between concentrations. METHODS: Thanks to the study of the distribution of simulated vectors of concentrations, the method provides one probability per individual that its observations (i.e., concentrations) come from the studied model. The higher the probability, the better the model fits the individual. By examining the distribution of these probabilities for a set of individuals, we can evaluate the model as a whole. RESULTS: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through two examples. Our approach successfully detects misspecification in the structural model and identifies outlier kinetics in a set of kinetics. CONCLUSION: We propose a straightforward method for evaluating models during their development and selecting a model to perform therapeutic drug monitoring. Based on our preliminary results, the method is very promising but needs to be validated on a larger scale. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10581936/ /pubmed/37717242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Baklouti, Sarah
Comets, Emmanuelle
Gandia, Peggy
Concordet, Didier
Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title_full Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title_fullStr Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title_short Multivariate Exact Discrepancy: A New Tool for PK/PD Model Evaluation
title_sort multivariate exact discrepancy: a new tool for pk/pd model evaluation
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01296-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bakloutisarah multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation
AT cometsemmanuelle multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation
AT gandiapeggy multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation
AT concordetdidier multivariateexactdiscrepancyanewtoolforpkpdmodelevaluation