Cargando…
Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia
BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) describes the practice of injecting a very dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into the tissue until it becomes firm and tense to obtain local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03342-x |
_version_ | 1785122263672029184 |
---|---|
author | Trignano, Emilio Tettamanzi, Matilde Liperi, Corrado Beatrici, Edoardo Serra, Pietro Luciano Trignano, Claudia Rubino, Corrado |
author_facet | Trignano, Emilio Tettamanzi, Matilde Liperi, Corrado Beatrici, Edoardo Serra, Pietro Luciano Trignano, Claudia Rubino, Corrado |
author_sort | Trignano, Emilio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) describes the practice of injecting a very dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into the tissue until it becomes firm and tense to obtain local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation intramuscular gluteoplasty has never been described for implants positioning. Advantages of the TLA technique include a reduction in blood loss through epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and hydrostatic compression from the tumescent effect. We describe TLA technique for primary intramuscular gluteal augmentation, reporting our experience during the last 5 years. METHODS: From 2017 to 2021, 20 patients underwent bilateral primary gluteal augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. The solution was infiltrated with a cannula inside the gluteus maximus muscle intra-operatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 39, 15 years. The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated was 240 mL per gluteus. Operating time was 1 h and 40 min, and recovery room time averaged 240 min. Major surgery-related complications were found in 15% of patients (2 hematomas and 1 seroma) and minor complications were described in a total of 8 patients (4 wound dehiscence and 1 dystrophic scar formation). No signs of adrenaline nor lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required. CONCLUSIONS: The tumescent local anesthesia technique represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing gluteal augmentation surgery with an intramuscular implant positioning. The advantages of this technique are safety, reasonable pain control during and after surgery and a low incidence of postoperative side effects due to general anesthesia avoidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10582138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105821382023-10-19 Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia Trignano, Emilio Tettamanzi, Matilde Liperi, Corrado Beatrici, Edoardo Serra, Pietro Luciano Trignano, Claudia Rubino, Corrado Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) describes the practice of injecting a very dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into the tissue until it becomes firm and tense to obtain local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation intramuscular gluteoplasty has never been described for implants positioning. Advantages of the TLA technique include a reduction in blood loss through epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and hydrostatic compression from the tumescent effect. We describe TLA technique for primary intramuscular gluteal augmentation, reporting our experience during the last 5 years. METHODS: From 2017 to 2021, 20 patients underwent bilateral primary gluteal augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. The solution was infiltrated with a cannula inside the gluteus maximus muscle intra-operatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 39, 15 years. The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated was 240 mL per gluteus. Operating time was 1 h and 40 min, and recovery room time averaged 240 min. Major surgery-related complications were found in 15% of patients (2 hematomas and 1 seroma) and minor complications were described in a total of 8 patients (4 wound dehiscence and 1 dystrophic scar formation). No signs of adrenaline nor lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required. CONCLUSIONS: The tumescent local anesthesia technique represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing gluteal augmentation surgery with an intramuscular implant positioning. The advantages of this technique are safety, reasonable pain control during and after surgery and a low incidence of postoperative side effects due to general anesthesia avoidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2023-04-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10582138/ /pubmed/37069350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03342-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Trignano, Emilio Tettamanzi, Matilde Liperi, Corrado Beatrici, Edoardo Serra, Pietro Luciano Trignano, Claudia Rubino, Corrado Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title | Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title_full | Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title_short | Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia |
title_sort | outcomes of intramuscular gluteal augmentation with implants using tumescent local anesthesia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03342-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trignanoemilio outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT tettamanzimatilde outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT lipericorrado outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT beatriciedoardo outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT serrapietroluciano outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT trignanoclaudia outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia AT rubinocorrado outcomesofintramuscularglutealaugmentationwithimplantsusingtumescentlocalanesthesia |