Cargando…

Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of printing layer thickness on the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A maxillary first molar model was prepared for ceramic restoration. Thirty‐six crowns were printed with three different layer thic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasanzade, Mahya, Yaghoobi, Negin, Nematollahi, Parsa, Ghazanfari, Rezvaneh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.758
_version_ 1785122285609287680
author Hasanzade, Mahya
Yaghoobi, Negin
Nematollahi, Parsa
Ghazanfari, Rezvaneh
author_facet Hasanzade, Mahya
Yaghoobi, Negin
Nematollahi, Parsa
Ghazanfari, Rezvaneh
author_sort Hasanzade, Mahya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of printing layer thickness on the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A maxillary first molar model was prepared for ceramic restoration. Thirty‐six crowns were printed with three different layer thicknesses using a digital light processing‐based three‐dimensional printer (25, 50, and 100 µm [LT 25, LT 50, and LT 100]). The marginal and internal gaps of the crowns were measured with replica technique. An analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there were significant differences between the groups (ɑ = .05). RESULTS: The marginal gap of LT 100 group was significantly higher than that LT 25 (p = .002) and LT 50 groups (p ≤ .001). The LT 25 group has significantly larger axial gaps than LT 50 group (p = .013); however, there were no statistically significant differences between other groups. The LT 50 group showed the smallest axio‐occlusal gap. The mean occlusal gap differed significantly by printing layer thickness (p ≤ .001), with the largest gap occurring for LT 100. CONCLUSIONS: Provisional crowns printed with 50 µm layer thickness provided the best marginal and internal fit. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: It is recommended that provisional crowns be printed with a 50 µm layer thickness to ensure optimal marginal and internal fit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10582242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105822422023-10-19 Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique Hasanzade, Mahya Yaghoobi, Negin Nematollahi, Parsa Ghazanfari, Rezvaneh Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of printing layer thickness on the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A maxillary first molar model was prepared for ceramic restoration. Thirty‐six crowns were printed with three different layer thicknesses using a digital light processing‐based three‐dimensional printer (25, 50, and 100 µm [LT 25, LT 50, and LT 100]). The marginal and internal gaps of the crowns were measured with replica technique. An analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there were significant differences between the groups (ɑ = .05). RESULTS: The marginal gap of LT 100 group was significantly higher than that LT 25 (p = .002) and LT 50 groups (p ≤ .001). The LT 25 group has significantly larger axial gaps than LT 50 group (p = .013); however, there were no statistically significant differences between other groups. The LT 50 group showed the smallest axio‐occlusal gap. The mean occlusal gap differed significantly by printing layer thickness (p ≤ .001), with the largest gap occurring for LT 100. CONCLUSIONS: Provisional crowns printed with 50 µm layer thickness provided the best marginal and internal fit. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: It is recommended that provisional crowns be printed with a 50 µm layer thickness to ensure optimal marginal and internal fit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10582242/ /pubmed/37386767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.758 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hasanzade, Mahya
Yaghoobi, Negin
Nematollahi, Parsa
Ghazanfari, Rezvaneh
Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title_full Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title_fullStr Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title_short Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D‐printing technique
title_sort comparison of the marginal and internal fit of pmma interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3d‐printing technique
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.758
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanzademahya comparisonofthemarginalandinternalfitofpmmainterimcrownsprintedwithdifferentlayerthicknessesin3dprintingtechnique
AT yaghoobinegin comparisonofthemarginalandinternalfitofpmmainterimcrownsprintedwithdifferentlayerthicknessesin3dprintingtechnique
AT nematollahiparsa comparisonofthemarginalandinternalfitofpmmainterimcrownsprintedwithdifferentlayerthicknessesin3dprintingtechnique
AT ghazanfarirezvaneh comparisonofthemarginalandinternalfitofpmmainterimcrownsprintedwithdifferentlayerthicknessesin3dprintingtechnique